Department of Community and Mental Health Nursing, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221125574. doi: 10.1177/17455057221125574.
To evaluate the structural and construct validity, and internal consistency of the Quality of Life Scale among Canadian women with histories of intimate partner violence.
Consistent with COSMIN Guidelines, a secondary analysis was conducted using data from a community sample of 250 adult (over 18 years) Canadian women with histories of partner violence and who participated in Wave 5 of the longitudinal Women's Health Effects Study. Data were collected 4 years after baseline using structured interviews that included the Quality of Life Scale and two mental symptom scales (Center for Epidemiological Depression Scale and Davidson Trauma Scale) used to assess construct validity of the Quality of Life Scale.
Confirmatory factor analysis in MPLUS 8 with maximum likelihood estimation supported the hypothesized unidimensional structure of the 9-item Quality of Life Scale based on acceptable fit indices. Internal consistency, estimated using Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability, were .91 and .92, respectively, with item-total correlations ranging from .46 to .84. Inter-item correlation coefficients (range = .30-.79), suggesting that all items contribute to the total score. As hypothesized, the quality of life total score was negatively related to the total scores on both the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression ( = -.739) and Davidson Trauma Scale ( = -.537), providing evidence of construct validity of the Quality of Life Scale.
The Quality of Life Scale is a brief, reliable, valid, unidimensional self-report measure appropriate for use with women who have experienced partner violence. By addressing an important measurement gap, results of this study have potential to advance research on women's quality of life in the context of partner violence, including improving the evaluation of a growing body of advocacy and health interventions designed to support women's healing and well-being.
评估有亲密伴侣暴力史的加拿大女性生活质量量表的结构和建构效度以及内部一致性。
根据 COSMIN 指南,对一项社区样本的 250 名成年(18 岁以上)有伴侣暴力史并参加妇女健康影响研究纵向研究第 5 波的加拿大女性进行了二次分析。使用包括生活质量量表和两个心理症状量表(流行病学抑郁量表和戴维森创伤量表)的结构访谈,在基线 4 年后收集数据,用于评估生活质量量表的建构效度。
在 MPLUS 8 中使用最大似然估计进行的验证性因子分析支持了假设的 9 项生活质量量表的单维结构,具有可接受的拟合指数。使用 Cronbach's alpha 和综合可靠性估计的内部一致性分别为.91 和.92,项目-总分相关性范围为.46 至.84。项目间相关系数(范围为.30-.79),表明所有项目均有助于总分。正如假设的那样,生活质量总分与流行病学抑郁量表( = -.739)和戴维森创伤量表( = -.537)的总分呈负相关,这为生活质量量表的建构效度提供了证据。
生活质量量表是一种简短、可靠、有效的、单维度的自我报告测量工具,适用于经历过伴侣暴力的女性。通过解决一个重要的测量差距,本研究的结果有可能推进伴侣暴力背景下妇女生活质量的研究,包括改善对越来越多旨在支持妇女康复和福祉的倡导和健康干预措施的评估。