Suppr超能文献

取栓治疗失败后大脑中动脉闭塞所致急性缺血性脑卒中患者应用补救性支架取栓技术的可行性:单中心回顾性经验。

Feasibility of rescue stenting technique in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to middle cerebral artery occlusion after failed thrombectomy: A single-center retrospective experience.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 27;17(9):e0274842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274842. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite remarkable advancements in intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy (IAT), recanalization failure rates up to 24% have been reported. Recently, permanent stent placement (rescue stent, RS) during IAT has been suggested as an optional modality for better reperfusion and outcomes in these patients. However, previous studies were limited owing to non-standardized procedure protocols and small sample sizes. Here, we aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of RS in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion.

METHODS

Of the 243 patients in our IAT database (2015-2021), 183 were identified as having MCA occlusion alone. Among them, we extracted 53 patients in whom the IAT failed to show thrombolysis in cerebral ischemia (TICI) scores of 2A or worse. Intraoperatively, RS was deployed in 22 patients (RS group), whereas 31 patients (no-stent group) received IAT without stenting. The baseline characteristics and radiologic and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Comparisons between the groups and multivariate logistic analyses for recanalization and good functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) were performed.

RESULTS

No baseline differences were noted (RS vs. no-stent); however, the recanalization outcomes (59.1% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.15) and proportion of good modified Rankin Scale scores (45.5% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.041) were better in the RS group. The parameters of symptomatic ICH (9.7% vs. 9.4%) and mortality (6.5% vs. 5.7%) showed no significant difference. In the multivariate analyses, 'hypertension' and 'RS deployment' were identified as significantly associated factors with recanalization and good prognosis.

CONCLUSION

In select patients with MCA occlusion AIS after failed IAT, the RS technique can be an optional rescue treatment modality for acquiring better functional outcomes and delayed recanalization.

摘要

背景

尽管动脉内机械血栓切除术(IAT)取得了显著进展,但仍有高达 24%的再通失败率报告。最近,在 IAT 期间永久性支架置入(挽救性支架,RS)已被提议作为改善这些患者再灌注和结局的一种可选方式。然而,由于程序方案未标准化和样本量小,之前的研究受到限制。在此,我们旨在确定 RS 在伴有大脑中动脉(MCA)闭塞的急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

在我们的 IAT 数据库(2015-2021 年)中的 243 名患者中,有 183 名被确定为仅患有 MCA 闭塞。其中,我们从接受 IAT 但未能显示血栓溶解程度(TICI)评分达到 2A 或更差的 53 名患者中提取数据。22 名患者(RS 组)术中置入 RS,而 31 名患者(无支架组)未置入支架接受 IAT。回顾了基线特征、影像学和临床结局。对两组进行比较,并进行多变量逻辑分析以评估再通和良好功能结局(改良 Rankin 量表 0-2)。

结果

两组之间无基线差异(RS 组与无支架组);然而,RS 组的再通结局(59.1%比 25.8%,p=0.15)和良好改良 Rankin 量表评分比例(45.5%比 19.4%,p=0.041)更好。症状性 ICH(9.7%比 9.4%)和死亡率(6.5%比 5.7%)的参数无显著差异。在多变量分析中,“高血压”和“RS 置入”被确定为与再通和良好预后显著相关的因素。

结论

在 IAT 失败后伴有 MCA 闭塞的 AIS 患者中,RS 技术可作为获得更好功能结局和延迟再通的可选挽救治疗方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bc2/9514649/746228874b6c/pone.0274842.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验