• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颅直流电刺激治疗多发性硬化痉挛患者:探索新途径。

Transcranial direct current stimulation for spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis: Exploring novel routes.

机构信息

Kasr Al-Ainy School of medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Kasr Al-Ainy School of medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Nov;67:104191. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104191. Epub 2022 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2022.104191
PMID:36166930
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with Multiple sclerosis (MS) usually suffer from severe neurological disabilities. Spasticity is one of the most bothering and disabling manifestations that MS patients suffer from. Owing to being a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disorder; finding new modalities to alleviate some of the disabilities related to MS became a desired objective. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a relatively new tool for modulating cortical excitability has been recently considered as a tool to provide symptomatic treatment for many neurologic and psychiatric diseases. In our study, we used tDCS to assess its effect on spasticity in MS patients.

METHODS

5 consecutive daily sessions of 20 minutes duration of active anodal tDCS over the ipsilesional motor cortex were given to 10 relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) patients with at least 1 spastic lower limb (active group) who were compared with other matched10 RRMS patients who received sham stimulation (sham group). The outcome was to measure the effect on spasticity both clinically using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and through neurophysiological assessment (H reflex latency and H/M amplitude ratio).

RESULTS

Patients who received active anodal tDCS showed significant improvement (p< 0.05) in the H/M amplitude ratio as compared to the sham group. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the MAS. H latency showed significant stability in active group when compared to the sham group.

CONCLUSION

Anodal direct current stimulation of the ipsilesional motor cortex in patients with MS, resulted in reduced spasticity as per neurophysiological assessment.

摘要

背景

多发性硬化症(MS)患者通常患有严重的神经功能障碍。痉挛是 MS 患者最困扰和致残的表现之一。由于多发性硬化症是一种慢性炎症性脱髓鞘疾病,寻找新的方法来减轻与 MS 相关的一些残疾成为一个理想的目标。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种调节皮质兴奋性的相对较新的工具,最近被认为是一种为许多神经和精神疾病提供症状治疗的工具。在我们的研究中,我们使用 tDCS 来评估其对 MS 患者痉挛的影响。

方法

对 10 名至少有 1 条痉挛性下肢的复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者(主动组)进行连续 5 天,每天 20 分钟的同侧运动皮质阳极 tDCS 治疗,与接受假刺激的 10 名匹配 RRMS 患者(假刺激组)进行比较。结果是通过临床使用改良 Ashworth 量表(MAS)和神经生理学评估(H 反射潜伏期和 H/M 幅度比)来衡量对痉挛的影响。

结果

与假刺激组相比,接受阳极 tDCS 治疗的患者 H/M 幅度比明显改善(p<0.05)。然而,两组间 MAS 无显著差异。与假刺激组相比,主动组的 H 潜伏期显示出显著的稳定性。

结论

MS 患者同侧运动皮质的阳极直流电刺激导致神经生理学评估的痉挛减轻。

相似文献

1
Transcranial direct current stimulation for spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis: Exploring novel routes.经颅直流电刺激治疗多发性硬化痉挛患者:探索新途径。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Nov;67:104191. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104191. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
2
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of motor cortex does not ameliorate spasticity in multiple sclerosis.运动皮层的阳极经颅直流电刺激不能改善多发性硬化症中的痉挛状态。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(4):487-92. doi: 10.3233/RNN-150495.
3
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates spasticity in multiple sclerosis.重复经颅磁刺激运动皮层可改善多发性硬化症中的痉挛状态。
Neurology. 2007 Mar 27;68(13):1045-50. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000257818.16952.62.
4
[Intermittent theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of spasticity in patients with recurring multiple sclerosis: the results of a double-blind randomised clinical trial].[间歇性theta波爆发式经颅磁刺激治疗复发型多发性硬化症患者的痉挛状态:一项双盲随机临床试验的结果]
Rev Neurol. 2019 Jul 16;69(2):45-52. doi: 10.33588/rn.6902.2018275.
5
Effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation on spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis.经颅磁刺激治疗多发性硬化患者痉挛的疗效观察。
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Feb;17(2):295-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02806.x. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
6
Contralesional Cathodal versus Dual Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Decreasing Upper Limb Spasticity in Chronic Stroke Individuals: A Clinical and Neurophysiological Study.对侧阴极与双经颅直流电刺激降低慢性卒中患者上肢痉挛的临床及神经生理学研究
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Dec;25(12):2932-2941. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
7
Does anodal trans-cranial direct current stimulation of the damaged primary motor cortex affects wrist flexor muscle spasticity and also activity of the wrist flexor and extensor muscles in patients with stroke?: a Randomized Clinical Trial.经颅直流电刺激损伤初级运动皮层对脑卒中患者腕屈肌痉挛及腕屈肌和伸肌活动的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Neurol Sci. 2021 Jul;42(7):2763-2773. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04858-9. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
8
The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of spasticity.重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在痉挛治疗中的应用。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:429-39. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17528-3.
9
[The application of high-frequency and iTBS transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of spasticity in the patients presenting with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis].[高频和间歇性θ波爆发式经颅磁刺激在继发进展型多发性硬化症患者痉挛治疗中的应用]
Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult. 2016;93(5):8-13. doi: 10.17116/kurort201658-13.
10
A pilot study on the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the pharyngeal motor cortex for dysphagia associated with brainstem involvement in multiple sclerosis.经颅直流电刺激咽肌运动皮质治疗多发性硬化脑干受累相关吞咽障碍的初步研究。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Jun;130(6):1017-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Tele-rehabilitation using transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise in people with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial.经颅直流电刺激联合运动对脊髓损伤患者进行远程康复治疗:一项随机对照试验。
J Rehabil Med. 2025 May 7;57:jrm42353. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v57.42353.
2
Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Spasticity Management in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.多发性硬化症中用于痉挛管理的非药物干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述。
Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Oct;48(5):305-343. doi: 10.5535/arm.240064. Epub 2024 Oct 31.