Agrawal Nidhi, Singh Anuradha, Gupta Anju
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India.
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, AIIMS, Delhi, India.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Apr-Jun;38(2):184-190. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_204_20. Epub 2022 May 31.
Several supraglottic airway devices (SGD) are available nowadays. But none has been found to be better than Proseal laryngeal mask (PLMA) in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). We aimed to compare OLP of newly introduced Baska® Mask with PLMA in patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia.
Totally, 80 consecutive adult patients of either sex requiring general anesthesia were randomized into two groups Group B (Baska mask, n = 40) or Group P (PLMA. n = 40). After standardized induction with propofol 2 - 2.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 2 mgkg, and muscle relaxation with vecuronium 0.1 mgkg one of the two devices was placed. OLP (primary outcome) was measured 5 minutes and 30 minutes post induction. The time needed to achieve effective airway, anatomical alignment of the device, number of attempts, leak fraction, and postoperative laryngopharyngeal morbidity were noted.
Both the devices could be inserted in first attempt in all the patients, but the time needed to achieve effective airway was significantly less in Group B (12.58 ± 1.81 sec vs 17.92 ± 2.45 sec, P < 0.001). The mean OLP was better in Group B at 5 min (37.6 ± 2.43 cm HO vs 30.82 ± 3.96 cm HO) and at 30 min (38.83 ± 1.72 cm HO vs 30.82 ± 3.96 cm HO; P < 0.001). Anatomical alignment of SGD with glottis (FOB grade 3 or 4 view) was significantly better in group B (34/40) as compared to group P (25/40) (p = 0.009). There was no difference in laryngopharyngeal morbidity in the two groups.
Baska mask provided higher OLP, better alignment to the glottis and faster placement time as compared to PLMA.
目前有多种声门上气道装置(SGD)可供使用。但就口咽漏气压(OLP)而言,尚未发现有哪种装置优于喉罩(PLMA)。我们旨在比较新型Baska®面罩与喉罩在全身麻醉下接受择期手术患者中的口咽漏气压。
总共80例需要全身麻醉的成年患者,无论性别,被随机分为两组:B组(Baska面罩,n = 40)和P组(喉罩,n = 40)。在使用2 - 2.5mg/kg丙泊酚和2mg/kg芬太尼进行标准化诱导,并使用0.1mg/kg维库溴铵进行肌肉松弛后,放置两种装置中的一种。诱导后5分钟和30分钟测量口咽漏气压(主要结局)。记录实现有效气道所需的时间、装置的解剖位置对合情况、尝试次数、漏气率以及术后咽喉部发病率。
所有患者均能在首次尝试时插入两种装置,但B组实现有效气道所需时间显著更短(12.58 ± 1.81秒对17.92 ± 2.45秒,P < 0.001)。B组在5分钟时的平均口咽漏气压更好(37.6 ± 2.43cmH₂O对30.82 ± 3.96cmH₂O),在30分钟时也是如此(38.83 ± 1.72cmH₂O对30.82 ± 3.96cmH₂O;P < 0.001)。与P组(25/40)相比,B组声门上气道装置与声门的解剖位置对合情况(纤维支气管镜3级或4级视野)显著更好(34/40)(p = 0.009)。两组的咽喉部发病率无差异。
与喉罩相比,Baska面罩提供了更高的口咽漏气压、更好的声门对合以及更快的放置时间。