Suppr超能文献

加拿大器官捐献中使用常温区域性灌注的定性试点研究的研究方案:探索伦理问题和利益相关者信任。

Protocol for a qualitative pilot study to explore ethical issues and stakeholder trust in the use of normothermic regional perfusion in organ donation in Canada.

机构信息

Philosophy and Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada

Centre for Education Research and Innovation and Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 29;12(9):e067515. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067515.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The process of controlled organ donation after circulatory determination of death (cDCDD) results in ischaemic injury to organs and leads to poorer outcomes in organ recipients. Although not yet used in Canada, normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is a perfusion technology used postmortem with cDCDD donors to selectively restore perfusion of oxygenated blood to target organs in situ, reversing ischaemic injury and improving organ viability and post-transplant outcomes. However, NRP poses significant ethical challenges. To preserve trust in deceased donation, these ethical challenges must be addressed to the satisfaction of Canadian stakeholders before NRP's implementation. This study will identify ethical issues pertaining to NRP and explore perspectives of NRP among key stakeholders. By developing an explanatory framework delineating how stakeholder perceptions of NRP's ethical implications impact trust in Canada's donation and transplantation systems, this study will inform the development of responsible policy on NRP's use in Canada.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study includes two workstreams. Workstream 1 is a scoping review of medical and bioethical literature to identify ethical issues stemming from NRP. We will apply a common search string across Medline, PubMed (other than Medline) and Embase to identify relevant articles. We will identify grey literature through Google searches, websites of organ donation organisations and consultation with our research network. No date limits will be applied. All peer-reviewed publications, commentaries, editorials or documents that engage with ethical issues in NRP (or conceptual and empirical issues as they relate to these ethical issues) will be included. News articles, conference abstracts and publications not in English will be excluded. Workstream 2 consists of interviews with healthcare providers, institutional stakeholders, organ recipients and deceased donors' family members (n=24-36), as well as focus groups with healthcare providers involved in deceased donation and transplantation (n20-32). Constructivist grounded theory methodology will guide data collection and analysis in workstream 2.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by Western University's research ethics committee (Western REM; ID: 120001). All participants will be asked to provide written informed consent to participate. Findings will be shared with Canadian organ donation and transplantation organisations, presented at national conferences and published in medical journals.

摘要

简介

通过循环死亡判定(circulatory determination of death,cDCD)进行控制器官捐献会导致器官缺血损伤,从而使器官接受者的预后更差。虽然在加拿大尚未使用,但体温区域灌注(normothermic regional perfusion,NRP)是一种在 cDCD 供体死后使用的灌注技术,用于有选择性地恢复含氧血液向原位靶器官的灌注,逆转缺血损伤,提高器官活力和移植后效果。然而,NRP 带来了重大的伦理挑战。为了维护对死亡捐献的信任,在加拿大实施 NRP 之前,必须让加拿大的利益相关者满意地解决这些伦理问题。本研究将确定与 NRP 相关的伦理问题,并探讨关键利益相关者对 NRP 的看法。通过制定一个解释框架,阐明利益相关者对 NRP 伦理影响的看法如何影响对加拿大捐赠和移植系统的信任,本研究将为加拿大 NRP 使用的负责任政策提供信息。

方法与分析

本研究包括两个工作流程。工作流程 1 是对医学和生物伦理文献进行范围综述,以确定源自 NRP 的伦理问题。我们将在 Medline、PubMed(除 Medline 外)和 Embase 中应用一个共同的搜索字符串来识别相关文章。我们将通过 Google 搜索、器官捐赠组织的网站以及与我们的研究网络的协商来确定灰色文献。不设日期限制。所有同行评议出版物、评论、社论或涉及 NRP 伦理问题的文件(或与这些伦理问题相关的概念和经验问题),以及新闻文章、会议摘要和非英文出版物都将被排除在外。工作流程 2 包括对医疗保健提供者、机构利益相关者、器官接受者和已故供体的家属(n=24-36)进行访谈,以及对参与死亡捐赠和移植的医疗保健提供者进行焦点小组讨论(n20-32)。建构主义扎根理论方法将指导工作流程 2 中的数据收集和分析。

伦理与传播

本研究已获得 Western 大学研究伦理委员会(Western REM;ID:120001)的批准。所有参与者将被要求提供书面知情同意书以参与研究。研究结果将与加拿大器官捐赠和移植组织分享,在全国会议上展示,并发表在医学期刊上。

相似文献

3
Sowing "seeds of trust": How trust in normothermic regional perfusion is built in a continuum of care.
Am J Transplant. 2024 Nov;24(11):2045-2054. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.05.017. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Neither Ethical nor Prudent: Why Not to Choose Normothermic Regional Perfusion.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Jul;54(4):14-23. doi: 10.1002/hast.1584. Epub 2024 May 20.
6
Applying the ethical framework for donation after circulatory death to thoracic normothermic regional perfusion procedures.
Am J Transplant. 2022 May;22(5):1311-1315. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16959. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
7
Response to American College of Physician's statement on the ethics of transplant after normothermic regional perfusion.
Am J Transplant. 2022 May;22(5):1307-1310. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16947. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Normothermic regional perfusion: Ethical issues in thoracic organ donation.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jul;164(1):147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
Response to American College of Physician's statement on the ethics of transplant after normothermic regional perfusion.
Am J Transplant. 2022 May;22(5):1307-1310. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16947. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
3
Ensuring the Permanent Cessation of Brain Function During Normothermic Regional Perfusion.
Transplantation. 2022 Sep 1;106(9):1726-1727. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004048. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
4
In defence of the bioethics scoping review: Largely systematic literature reviewing with broad utility.
Bioethics. 2022 May;36(4):423-433. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12991. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
5
Paving the Road for the Adoption of Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Canada.
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Oct 28;3(11):e0553. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000553. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Expanding controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death: statement from an international collaborative.
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Mar;47(3):265-281. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06341-7. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
9
Transplanting Marginal Organs in the Era of Modern Machine Perfusion and Advanced Organ Monitoring.
Front Immunol. 2020 May 12;11:631. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00631. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验