Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus; The Reynolds Building; St Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP, UK.
Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool; Waterhouse Building Block F, 2nd Floor, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 29;12(9):e059739. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059739.
Reductions in local government spending may have impacts on diets and health which increase the risk of hospital admissions for nutritional anaemias. Mechanisms include potential impacts of changes to local authority (LA) services (eg, housing services) on personal resources and food access, availability and provision. We therefore investigated the association between changes in LA spending and nutritional anaemia-related hospital admissions. Specifically, we address whether greater cuts to LA spending were linked to increased hospital admissions for nutritional anaemias.
Longitudinal analysis of LA panel data using Poisson fixed effects regression models.
312 LAs in England (2005-2018).
Total LA service expenditure per capita per year.
Principal and total nutritional anaemia hospital admissions, for all ages and stratified by age (0-14, 15-64, 65+ years).
LA service expenditure increased by 9% between 2005 and 2009 then decreased by 20% between 2010 and 2018. Total nutritional anaemia hospital admissions increased between 2005 and 2018 from 173 to 633 admissions per 100 000 population. A £100 higher LA service spending was associated with a 1.9% decrease in total nutritional anaemia hospital admissions (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR): 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96 to 0.99). When stratified by age, this was seen only in adults. A £100 higher LA service spending was associated with a 2.6% decrease in total nutritional anaemia hospital admissions in the most deprived LAs (aIRR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.0).
Increased LA spending was associated with reduced hospital admissions for nutritional anaemia. Austerity-related reductions had the opposite effect, increasing admissions, with greater impacts in more deprived areas. This adds further evidence to the potential negative impacts of austerity policies on health and health inequalities. Among other impacts, re-investing in LA services may prevent hospital admissions associated with nutritional anaemias.
地方政府支出减少可能会影响饮食和健康,从而增加因营养性贫血住院的风险。这些机制包括地方当局(LA)服务(例如住房服务)变化对个人资源和食物获取、供应和提供的潜在影响。因此,我们调查了 LA 支出变化与营养性贫血相关住院之间的关联。具体而言,我们研究了 LA 支出削减幅度更大是否与营养性贫血住院人数增加有关。
使用泊松固定效应回归模型对 LA 面板数据进行纵向分析。
英格兰的 312 个 LA(2005-2018 年)。
LA 服务的人均每年支出。
所有年龄和按年龄分层(0-14 岁、15-64 岁、65 岁以上)的主要和总营养性贫血住院人数。
2005 年至 2009 年期间,LA 服务支出增加了 9%,然后在 2010 年至 2018 年期间下降了 20%。2005 年至 2018 年期间,总营养性贫血住院人数从 173 例增加到 633 例/每 100000 人。LA 服务支出每增加 100 英镑,总营养性贫血住院人数就会减少 1.9%(调整后的发病率比 (aIRR):0.98,95%置信区间:0.96 至 0.99)。按年龄分层,这种情况仅见于成年人。LA 服务支出每增加 100 英镑,最贫困的 LA 地区的总营养性贫血住院人数就会减少 2.6%(aIRR:0.97,95%置信区间:0.95 至 1.0)。
增加 LA 支出与营养性贫血住院人数减少有关。与紧缩相关的减少则产生了相反的效果,增加了住院人数,在较贫困地区的影响更大。这为紧缩政策对健康和健康不平等的潜在负面影响提供了更多证据。除其他影响外,重新投资于 LA 服务可能会防止与营养性贫血相关的住院。