Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK.
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Health Policy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 28;23(1):1441. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16340-0.
Over the past decade, there have been significant and unequal cuts to local authority (LA) budgets, across England. Cultural, environmental and planning (CEP) budgets have been cut by 17% between 2011 and 2019. This funding supports services such as parks, leisure centres, community development and libraries, all of which have potential to influence population mental health. We therefore investigated whether cuts to CEP services have affected mental health outcomes and the extent to which they have contributed to mental health inequalities between areas.
Using fixed effects regression applied to longitudinal LA-level panel data in England, we assessed whether trends in CEP spend were associated with trends in mental health outcomes, between 2011 and 2019. The exposure was CEP spend and the primary outcome was the LA-average Small Area Mental Health Index (SAMHI). Additionally, we considered subcategories of CEP spend as secondary exposures, and antidepressant prescription rate and self-reported anxiety levels as secondary outcomes, both aggregated to LA-level. We adjusted all models for confounders and conducted subgroup analysis to examine differential mental health effects of spending cuts based on the level of area deprivation.
The average decrease in CEP spend of 15% over the period was associated with a 0.036 (95% CI: 0.005, 0.067) increase in SAMHI score, indicating worsening mental health. Amongst subcategories of CEP spending, cuts to planning and development services impacted mental health trends the most, with a 15% reduction in spend associated with a 0.018 (95% CI: 0.005, 0.031) increase in the SAMHI score. The association between cuts in CEP and deteriorating mental health was greater in more affluent areas.
Cuts to spending on cultural, environmental, planning and development services were associated with worsening population mental health in England. Impacts were driven by cuts to planning and development services in particular. Reinvesting in these services may contribute to improved public mental health.
在过去的十年中,英格兰各地的地方当局(LA)预算大幅削减且不均等。文化、环境和规划(CEP)预算在 2011 年至 2019 年间减少了 17%。这笔资金用于支持公园、休闲中心、社区发展和图书馆等服务,所有这些都有可能影响人口的心理健康。因此,我们调查了 CEP 服务的削减是否影响了心理健康结果,以及它们在多大程度上导致了地区之间的心理健康不平等。
我们使用固定效应回归分析应用于英格兰的纵向 LA 水平面板数据,评估了 2011 年至 2019 年间 CEP 支出趋势与心理健康结果趋势之间的关系。暴露因素是 CEP 支出,主要结果是 LA 平均小区域心理健康指数(SAMHI)。此外,我们还将 CEP 支出的亚类作为次要暴露因素,将抗抑郁药处方率和自我报告的焦虑水平作为次要结果进行考虑,这两个结果都汇总到 LA 水平。我们对所有模型进行了混杂因素调整,并进行了亚组分析,以检查根据地区贫困程度,支出削减对心理健康的不同影响。
该期间 CEP 支出平均减少 15%,与 SAMHI 评分增加 0.036(95%CI:0.005,0.067)相关,表明心理健康状况恶化。在 CEP 支出的亚类中,规划和发展服务的削减对心理健康趋势的影响最大,支出减少 15%与 SAMHI 评分增加 0.018(95%CI:0.005,0.031)相关。在较富裕地区,CEP 削减与心理健康恶化之间的关联更为明显。
在英格兰,文化、环境、规划和发展服务支出的削减与人口心理健康状况的恶化有关。影响主要是由规划和发展服务的削减驱动的。对这些服务的再投资可能有助于改善公众的心理健康。