Psychology Department and Institute for Information Processing and Decision Making, University of Haifa, Israel; Integrated Brain and Behavior Center (IBBRC), University of Haifa, Israel.
Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Nov 5;176:108376. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108376. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
Brain plasticity implies that readers of different orthographies can have different reading networks. Theoretical models suggest that reading acquisition in transparent orthographies relies on mapping smaller orthographic units to phonology, than reading opaque orthographies; but what are the neural mechanisms underlying this difference? Hebrew has a transparent (pointed) script used for beginners, and a non-transparent script used for skilled readers. The current study examined the developmental changes in brain regions associated with phonological and orthographic processes during reading pointed and un-pointed words. Our results highlight some changes that are universal in reading development, such as a developmental increase in frontal involvement (in bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) pars opercularis), and increase in left asymmetry (in IFG pars opercularis and superior temporal gyrus, STG) of the reading network. Our results also showed a developmental increase in activation in STG, which stands in contrast to previous studies in other orthographies. We further found an interaction of word length and diacritics in bilateral STG and the visual word form area (VWFA) across both groups. These findings suggest that children slightly adjust their reading depending on orthographic transparency, relying on smaller units when reading a transparent script and on larger units when reading an opaque script. Our results also showed that phonological abilities across groups correlated with activation in the VWFA, regardless of transparency, supporting the continued role of phonology at all levels of orthographic transparency. Our findings are consistent with multiple route reading models, in which both phonological and orthographic processing of multiple size units continue to play a role in children's reading of transparent and opaque scripts during reading development. The results further demonstrate the importance of taking into account differences between orthographies when constructing neural models of reading acquisition.
脑可塑性意味着不同正字法的读者可能具有不同的阅读网络。理论模型表明,在透明正字法中,阅读的习得依赖于将较小的正字法单位映射到语音上,而在不透明正字法中则不是;但是,这种差异的神经机制是什么?希伯来语有一个用于初学者的透明(有标)脚本,以及一个用于熟练读者的不透明脚本。本研究考察了在阅读有标和无标单词时,与语音和正字法过程相关的大脑区域的发展变化。我们的结果强调了阅读发展中一些普遍的变化,例如额区参与的发展性增加(双侧额下回(IFG)三角部),以及阅读网络中左半球不对称性的增加(IFG 三角部和颞上回,STG)。我们的结果还显示了 STG 激活的发展性增加,这与其他正字法的先前研究形成对比。我们还发现,在双侧 STG 和视觉词形区(VWFA)中,词长和变音符号之间存在交互作用,这两个区域在两组中均存在。这些发现表明,儿童会根据正字法的透明度略微调整阅读,在阅读透明脚本时依赖较小的单位,在阅读不透明脚本时依赖较大的单位。我们的结果还表明,无论透明度如何,各组的语音能力都与 VWFA 的激活相关,这支持了在所有正字法透明度水平上语音都继续发挥作用的观点。我们的发现与多种途径阅读模型一致,在该模型中,多个大小单位的语音和正字法处理在儿童阅读透明和不透明脚本的阅读发展过程中继续发挥作用。这些结果进一步证明,在构建阅读习得的神经模型时,考虑正字法之间的差异非常重要。