Department of Psychology, Southeast Missouri State University, USA; Psychoendocrinology and Genetics Laboratory, Southeast Missouri State University, USA.
Biol Psychol. 2022 Nov;175:108428. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108428. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
Real-world anticipatory stressors account for rising rates of chronic psychophysiological stress and adverse health outcomes, yet the literature lacks an effective approach to study the anticipatory cortisol stress response. An extended pre-stressor period to capture peak anticipatory cortisol is not conducive to laboratory stress manipulations but is inherent to naturalistic stressors. Naturalistic approaches have been frequently utilized, but few studies included valid baseline and temporally proximate pre-post cortisol measures to operationalize the anticipatory cortisol stress response, and none have differentiated anticipatory from reactive response types. To address these gaps, this study sought to establish an effective and easy-to-implement protocol to investigate the anticipatory cortisol stress response. Saliva was sampled from 78 healthy college students (69 % female) before and after a 50-minute class period on a day of a lecture (baseline) and day of a scheduled written exam (stressor). The overall sample displayed an anticipatory stress response, operationalized as peak pre-exam cortisol and post-exam levels that returned to baseline, while individual response patterns were also detected and subsequently differentiated into anticipatory (37 %), reactive (9 %), anticipatory-reactive (13 %), and non- (41 %) response groups. These responses are consistent with those previously differentiated in a controlled laboratory setting with an exhaustive sampling schedule; yet this study captured a larger number of pre-stressor (anticipatory) cortisol peaks. Subjective measures of psychological stress were also examined. Findings demonstrate the effectiveness of a college written exam and validity of a baseline-pre-post sampling design for operationalizing the anticipatory cortisol stress response and differentiating within-sample response variability.
现实生活中的预期压力源导致慢性心理生理压力和不良健康结果的发生率上升,但文献中缺乏一种有效的方法来研究预期皮质醇应激反应。延长预应激期以捕捉皮质醇的峰值预期并不利于实验室应激操作,但却是自然应激的固有特征。自然主义方法经常被使用,但很少有研究包括有效的基线和时间上接近的前后皮质醇测量来操作预期的皮质醇应激反应,也没有区分预期和反应性反应类型。为了解决这些差距,本研究旨在建立一种有效且易于实施的方案来研究预期的皮质醇应激反应。在一天的讲座(基线)和一天的预定书面考试(压力源)前,从 78 名健康大学生(69%为女性)的唾液中取样。总体样本显示出预期的应激反应,表现为考前皮质醇峰值和考试后水平恢复到基线,同时也检测到个体反应模式,并随后分为预期(37%)、反应(9%)、预期-反应(13%)和非(41%)反应组。这些反应与之前在控制实验室环境中使用详尽的采样方案区分的反应一致;然而,本研究捕捉到了更多的考前(预期)皮质醇峰值。还检查了心理压力的主观测量。研究结果表明,大学书面考试和基线-前后采样设计的有效性,可用于操作预期皮质醇应激反应并区分样本内反应的可变性。