• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.鸡尾酒会上说话人搜索个体差异的分子分析。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Sep;152(3):1804. doi: 10.1121/10.0014116.
2
A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.测试鸡尾酒会效应中个体差异的模型类别。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Dec;148(6):4014. doi: 10.1121/10.0002961.
3
Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.训练对年轻听力正常者和老年听力受损者在噪声环境下单词识别能力的影响。
Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):263-78. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215980.21158.a2.
4
Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.听力正常儿童以及双侧或单侧轻度听力损失儿童的注视行为与视听言语理解
Ear Hear. 2018 Jul/Aug;39(4):783-794. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000534.
5
The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.在一项实词、开放集感知测试中,说话者和听者相关因素对可懂度的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Aug;47(4):725-37. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/055).
6
The Effects of Uncertainty in Level on Speech-on-Speech Masking.水平不确定性对言语掩蔽的影响。
Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221077555. doi: 10.1177/23312165221077555.
7
The Listener Effect in Multitalker Speech Segregation and Talker Identification.多说话人语音分离和说话人识别中的听众效应。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211051886. doi: 10.1177/23312165211051886.
8
Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.母语和非母语听者在英语语音感知中因噪声、混响和说话者外国口音而产生的听力努力。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Apr 15;62(4):1068-1081. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0423.
9
Revealing Perceptional and Cognitive Mechanisms in Static and Dynamic Cocktail Party Listening by Means of Error Analyses.通过错误分析揭示静态和动态鸡尾酒会聆听中的感知和认知机制。
Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221111676. doi: 10.1177/23312165221111676.
10
Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.双耳时间精细结构和包络线索在鸡尾酒会式聆听中的作用。
J Neurosci. 2016 Aug 3;36(31):8250-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4421-15.2016.

引用本文的文献

1
The interplay of uncertainty, relevance and learning influences auditory categorization.不确定性、关联性和学习之间的相互作用会影响听觉分类。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 27;15(1):3348. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86856-5.
2
Simultaneous relative cue reliance in speech-on-speech masking.语音掩蔽中同时的相对线索依赖。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Oct 1;154(4):2530-2538. doi: 10.1121/10.0021874.

本文引用的文献

1
The Listener Effect in Multitalker Speech Segregation and Talker Identification.多说话人语音分离和说话人识别中的听众效应。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211051886. doi: 10.1177/23312165211051886.
2
A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.测试鸡尾酒会效应中个体差异的模型类别。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Dec;148(6):4014. doi: 10.1121/10.0002961.
3
Musicians Show Improved Speech Segregation in Competitive, Multi-Talker Cocktail Party Scenarios.音乐家在竞争性多说话者鸡尾酒会场景中表现出更好的语音分离能力。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 18;11:1927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01927. eCollection 2020.
4
Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.刺激变异性对学龄儿童和成人在噪声环境与双说话人语音中单词识别的贡献。
Ear Hear. 2021 Mar/Apr;42(2):313-322. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000951.
5
Individual listener differences in azimuthal front-back reversals.个体听众在水平方位正反反转上的差异。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Oct;146(4):2709. doi: 10.1121/1.5129555.
6
Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech.应对逆境:嘈杂和带口音语音感知中的个体差异。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1559-1570. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1537-4.
7
A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.行为听阈和刺激频率耳声发射中的一种常见微观结构。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Nov;142(5):3069. doi: 10.1121/1.5009562.
8
Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.双说话人掩蔽在与目标语音的说话人一致性和感知相似性方面存在差异的有效性。
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517709385. doi: 10.1177/2331216517709385.
9
Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.听力阈值正常的听众在选择性注意能力上个体差异的皮层及感觉成因。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):2976-2988. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0080.
10
How many images are in an auditory scene?一个听觉场景中有多少图像?
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Apr;141(4):2882. doi: 10.1121/1.4981118.

鸡尾酒会上说话人搜索个体差异的分子分析。

Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

机构信息

Auditory Behavioral Research Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA.

Spatial Hearing Laboratory, Department of Speech and Hearing, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Sep;152(3):1804. doi: 10.1121/10.0014116.

DOI:10.1121/10.0014116
PMID:36182280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9507302/
Abstract

A molecular (trial-by-trial) analysis of data from a cocktail-party, target-talker search task was used to test two general classes of explanations accounting for individual differences in listener performance: cue weighting models for which errors are tied to the speech features talkers have in common with the target and internal noise models for which errors are largely independent of these features. The speech of eight different talkers was played simultaneously over eight different loudspeakers surrounding the listener. The locations of the eight talkers varied at random from trial to trial. The listener's task was to identify the location of a target talker with which they had previously been familiarized. An analysis of the response counts to individual talkers showed predominant confusion with one talker sharing the same fundamental frequency and timbre as the target and, secondarily, other talkers sharing the same timbre. The confusions occurred for a roughly constant 31% of all of the trials for all of the listeners. The remaining errors were uniformly distributed across the remaining talkers and responsible for the large individual differences in performances observed. The results are consistent with a model in which largely stimulus-independent factors (internal noise) are responsible for the wide variation in performance across listeners.

摘要

采用鸡尾酒会目标说话人搜索任务的逐次分析数据的方法,我们测试了两种解释个体听众表现差异的通用类别的模型:一种是基于说话人共有特征(如基频和音色)的线索加权模型,另一种是基于与这些特征关系不大的内部噪声模型。八个不同的说话人在环绕听众的八个不同扬声器上同时播放。说话人的位置从一次试验到另一次试验随机变化。听众的任务是识别与他们之前熟悉的目标说话人所在的位置。对个体说话人响应计数的分析表明,与目标说话人具有相同基频和音色的一个说话人引起了主要的混淆,其次是具有相同音色的其他说话人。对于所有听众的大约 31%的所有试验,这种混淆都经常发生。其余的错误均匀分布在其余的说话人之间,这是造成观察到的表现差异的主要原因。这些结果与一个模型一致,该模型认为主要是刺激独立的因素(内部噪声)导致了听众之间表现的广泛变化。