Suppr超能文献

重新审视围产期风险时期:一个新的参考群体及全国大县级分析

Refreshing the Perinatal Periods of Risk: A New Reference Group and Nationwide Large-County-Level Analyses.

作者信息

Gilbert Carol S, Xaverius Pamela K, Tibbits Melissa K, Sappenfield William M

机构信息

CityMatCH and the Division of Child Health Policy, Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982155, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

Maternal and Child Health Center of Excellence in Education, Science, and Practice, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2022 Dec;26(12):2396-2406. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03561-9. Epub 2022 Oct 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Perinatal Periods of Risk approach (PPOR) is designed for use by communities to assess and address the causes of high fetal-infant mortality rates using vital records data. The approach is widely used by local health departments and their community and academic partners to inform and motivate systems changes. PPOR was developed and tested in communities based on data years from 1995 to 2002. Unfortunately, a national reference group has not been published since then, primarily due to fetal death data quality limitations.

METHODS

This paper assesses data quality and creates a set of unbiased national reference groups using 2014-2016 national vital records data. Phase 1 and Phase 2 analytic methods were used to divide excess mortality into six components and create percentile plots to summarize the distribution of 100 large US counties for each component.

RESULTS

Eight states with poor fetal death data quality were omitted from the reference groups to reduce bias due to missing maternal demographic information. There are large Black-White disparities among reference groups with the same age and education restrictions, and these vary by component. PPOR results vary by region, maternal demographics, and county. The magnitude of excess mortality components varies widely across US counties.

DISCUSSION

New national reference groups will allow more communities to do PPOR. Percentile plots of 100 large US counties provide an additional benchmark for new communities using PPOR and help emphasize problem areas and potential solutions.

摘要

引言

围产期风险评估方法(PPOR)旨在供社区使用,利用生命统计数据评估并解决高胎儿-婴儿死亡率的成因。该方法被地方卫生部门及其社区和学术合作伙伴广泛采用,以指导并推动系统变革。PPOR是基于1995年至2002年的数据年份在社区中开发并测试的。遗憾的是,自那时起尚未发布全国参考组,主要原因是胎儿死亡数据质量存在局限性。

方法

本文使用2014 - 2016年全国生命统计数据评估数据质量,并创建一组无偏全国参考组。采用第一阶段和第二阶段分析方法将超额死亡率分为六个组成部分,并创建百分位图以汇总美国100个大县中每个组成部分的分布情况。

结果

参考组中遗漏了八个胎儿死亡数据质量较差的州,以减少因孕产妇人口统计信息缺失导致的偏差。在具有相同年龄和教育限制的参考组中,黑人和白人之间存在很大差异,且这些差异因组成部分而异。PPOR结果因地区、孕产妇人口统计信息和县域而异。美国各县超额死亡率组成部分的幅度差异很大。

讨论

新的全国参考组将使更多社区能够开展PPOR。美国100个大县的百分位图为使用PPOR的新社区提供了额外的基准,并有助于强调问题领域和潜在解决方案

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验