Schulte Christian, Singh Bhawana, Theofilatos Konstantinos, Sörensen Nils A, Lehmacher Jonas, Hartikainen Tau, Haller Paul M, Westermann Dirk, Zeller Tanja, Blankenberg Stefan, Neumann Johannes T, Mayr Manuel
King's British Heart Foundation Centre, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
J Mol Cell Cardiol Plus. 2022 Sep;1:None. doi: 10.1016/j.jmccpl.2022.100014.
While cardiac-specific troponin (cTn) allows for rapid diagnosis of acute type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), its performance to differentiate acute myocardial injury (AI) or type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) is limited. The objective was to combine biomarkers to improve discrimination of different myocardial infarction (MI) aetiologies.
We determined levels of cardiac troponin T and I (cTnT, cTnI), cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C), NT-proBNP and ten miRNAs, known to be associated with cardiac pathology in a total of = 495 serial plasma samples at three time points (on admission, after 1 h and 3 h) from 57 NSTEMI (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction), 18 AI, and 31 STEMI patients, as defined by fourth universal definition of MI (UDMI4) and 59 control individuals. We then applied linear mixed effects model to compare the kinetics of all molecules in these MI sub-types.
Established (cTnT, cTnI) and novel (cMyBP-C) cardiac necrosis markers failed in differentiating T1MI vs T2MI at early time points. All cardiac necrosis markers were higher in T1MI than in T2MI at 3 h after admission. Muscle-enriched miRNAs (miR-1 and miR-133a) were correlated with cardiac necrosis protein markers and did not offer better discrimination. Established cardiac strain marker NT-proBNP differentiated AI and T1MI at all time points but failed to discriminate T2MI from T1MI. However, the combination of NT-proBNP and cTnT along with age returned an overall AUC of 0.76 [95 % CI 0.67-0.84] for differentiating T1MI, T2MI and AI.
Rather than using single biomarkers of myocardial necrosis, a combination of clinical biomarkers for cardiac necrosis (troponin) and cardiac strain (NT-proBNP) might aid in differentiating T1MI, T2MI and AI.
虽然心脏特异性肌钙蛋白(cTn)有助于急性1型心肌梗死(T1MI)的快速诊断,但其在区分急性心肌损伤(AI)或2型心肌梗死(T2MI)方面的性能有限。目的是联合生物标志物以改善对不同病因心肌梗死(MI)的鉴别。
我们测定了57例非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)、18例AI和31例ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者以及59例对照个体在三个时间点(入院时、1小时后和3小时后)共495份连续血浆样本中心脏肌钙蛋白T和I(cTnT、cTnI)、心脏肌球蛋白结合蛋白C(cMyBP-C)、NT-proBNP和10种已知与心脏病理相关的微小RNA(miRNA)的水平。这些患者根据心肌梗死的第四次通用定义(UDMI4)进行定义。然后,我们应用线性混合效应模型比较这些MI亚型中所有分子的动力学。
既定的(cTnT、cTnI)和新型的(cMyBP-C)心脏坏死标志物在早期时间点未能区分T1MI和T2MI。入院后3小时,所有心脏坏死标志物在T1MI中均高于T2MI。肌肉富集的miRNA(miR-1和miR-133a)与心脏坏死蛋白标志物相关,且未提供更好的鉴别能力。既定的心脏应变标志物NT-proBNP在所有时间点均能区分AI和T一MI,但未能区分T2MI和T1MI。然而,NT-proBNP和cTnT联合年龄在区分T1MI、T2MI和AI时的总体曲线下面积(AUC)为0.76 [95%置信区间0.67 - 0.84]。
相比于使用心肌坏死的单一生物标志物,心脏坏死(肌钙蛋白)和心脏应变(NT-proBNP)的临床生物标志物联合使用可能有助于区分T1MI、T2MI和AI。