Rosenberg Adam, Cashion Catelyn, Ali Fariya, Haran Harini, Biswas Raaj K, Chen Vivien, Crowther Helen, Curnow Jennifer, Deakin Elyssa, Tan Chee-Wee, Tan Yi Ling, Vanlint Andrew, Ward Christopher M, Bird Robert, Rabbolini David J
Lismore Base Hospital Lismore New South Wales Australia.
The Royal North Shore Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022 Sep 18;6(6):e12792. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12792. eCollection 2022 Aug.
In Australia, prescribing restrictions limit access to internationally recommended second-line therapies such as rituximab and thrombopoietin agonists (TPO-A) (eltrombopag and romiplostim). Subsequent lines of therapy include an array of immunosuppressive and immune-modulating agents directed by drug availability and physician and patient preference.
The objective of the study was to describe the use of first and subsequent lines of treatment for adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in Australia and to assess their effectiveness and tolerability.
PATIENTS/METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted of 322 patients treated for ITP at eight participating centers in Australia between 2013 and 2020. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and frequency distribution using pivot tables, and comparisons between centers were assessed using paired tests.
Mean age at diagnosis of ITP was 48.8 years (standard deviation [SD], 22.6) and 58.3% were women. Primary ITP was observed in 72% and secondary ITP in 28% of the patients; 95% of patients received first-line treatment with prednisolone (76%), dexamethasone (15%), or intravenous immunoglobulin (48%) alone or in combination. Individuals with secondary ITP were less steroid dependent (72% vs. 76%) and required less treatment with a second-line agent (47% vs. 58%) in the study sample. Over half (56%) of the cohort received treatment with one or more second-line agents. The mean number of second-line agents used for each patient was 1.9 (SD, 1.2). The most used second-line therapy was rituximab, followed by etrombopag and splenectomy. These also generated the highest rates of complete response (60.3%, 72.1%, and 71.8% respectively). The most unfavorable side effect profiles were seen in long-term corticosteroids and splenectomy.
A wide range of "second-line" agents were used across centers with variable response rates and side effect profiles. Findings suggest greater effectiveness of rituximab and TPO-A, supporting their use earlier in the treatment course of patients with ITP across Australia.
在澳大利亚,处方限制使得患者难以获得国际推荐的二线治疗药物,如利妥昔单抗和血小板生成素激动剂(TPO - A)(艾曲泊帕和罗米司亭)。后续治疗方案包括一系列根据药物可及性以及医生和患者偏好而定的免疫抑制和免疫调节药物。
本研究的目的是描述澳大利亚成人免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)一线及后续治疗方案的使用情况,并评估其有效性和耐受性。
患者/方法:对2013年至2020年期间在澳大利亚八个参与中心接受ITP治疗的322例患者的病历进行回顾性分析。使用数据透视表通过描述性统计和频率分布对数据进行分析,并使用配对检验评估各中心之间的差异。
ITP诊断时的平均年龄为48.8岁(标准差[SD],22.6),女性占58.3%。72%的患者为原发性ITP,28%为继发性ITP;95%的患者接受了一线治疗,单独或联合使用泼尼松龙(76%)、地塞米松(15%)或静脉注射免疫球蛋白(48%)。在研究样本中,继发性ITP患者对类固醇的依赖性较低(72%对76%),需要二线药物治疗的比例也较低(47%对58%)。超过一半(56%)的队列接受了一种或多种二线药物治疗。每位患者使用二线药物的平均数量为1.9(SD,1.2)。使用最多的二线治疗药物是利妥昔单抗,其次是艾曲泊帕和脾切除术。这些治疗方法的完全缓解率也最高(分别为60.3%、72.1%和71.8%)。长期使用皮质类固醇和脾切除术的副作用最为不利。
各中心使用了多种“二线”药物,其有效率和副作用各不相同。研究结果表明利妥昔单抗和TPO - A的有效性更高,支持在澳大利亚ITP患者的治疗过程中更早使用这些药物。