Jazuli Muhamad Rosyid, Idris Maimanah Mohammed, Yaguma Penlope
Department of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Public Policy (STEaPP), University College London, London, UK.
Paramadina Public Policy Institute (PPPI), Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):334. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01343-w. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
Institutional quality is significantly relevant in determining national competitiveness when reflected in economic growth and successful development. Quality institutions manifest in robust 'rules of the game' reflected by sound governance and policymaking in at least four streams: social, economic, administrative, and political. Policy reforms intended to improve national competitiveness should aim to strengthen the streams simultaneously, whereas partial reforms could instead lead to poorer outcomes. Through the lens of institutional quality analysis, this paper critically reviews the relevance of Indonesia's Job Creation Law, colloquially known as the Omnibus Law, to improve the country's national competitiveness as conceptually intended. Declared as an overarching regulatory framework, the Law postulates Indonesia as prospecting for increased foreign investments. However, the Law is a partial policy reform as it overlooks the pivotal aspects necessary to improve institutional quality in Indonesia, such as inter-community relations, intellectual property regime certainty, quality vocational education, and meritocratic political recruitment. Thus, regardless of the opportunities, the Law may bring about, it may weaken national competitiveness instead. The Law is currently ruled conditionally unconstitutional by Indonesia's Constitutional Court. If it is to be defended by the government, however, further multi-sectoral collaboration is necessary for the future implementation of the Law to enhance Indonesia's institutional quality. In a more global context, this review indicates how developing nations should be mindful of various non-economic aspects (e.g., cultural and educational levels of the population) when undertaking policy reforms especially to enhance their national competitiveness. There may be future downsides to these implications and as it is too early to critically assess them, there is an opportunity through time and future research to do so.
制度质量在通过经济增长和成功发展体现出来时,对于决定国家竞争力具有重大意义。高质量的制度体现在稳健的“游戏规则”中,这至少在社会、经济、行政和政治四个方面通过良好的治理和政策制定得以体现。旨在提高国家竞争力的政策改革应旨在同时加强这些方面,而部分改革反而可能导致更差的结果。通过制度质量分析的视角,本文批判性地审视了印度尼西亚的《创造就业法》(俗称《综合法》)在从概念上提高该国国家竞争力方面的相关性。该法宣称是一个总体监管框架,假定印度尼西亚有望吸引更多外国投资。然而,该法是一项部分政策改革,因为它忽视了提高印度尼西亚制度质量所需的关键方面,如社区间关系、知识产权制度的确定性、高质量职业教育和精英政治选拔。因此,无论该法可能带来何种机遇,它反而可能削弱国家竞争力。该法目前被印度尼西亚宪法法院有条件地裁定违宪。然而,如果政府要为其辩护,未来实施该法时需要进一步的多部门合作以提高印度尼西亚的制度质量。在更广泛的全球背景下,这项审查表明发展中国家在进行政策改革尤其是提高国家竞争力时应如何关注各种非经济方面(如人口的文化和教育水平)。这些影响未来可能存在不利之处,而且目前对其进行批判性评估还为时过早,随着时间推移和未来研究,有机会这样做。