He Jia-Huan, Ruan Jia-Xing, Lei Ying, Hua Zhi-Dan, Chen Xiang, Huang Da, Chen Cheng-Shui, Jin Xu-Ru
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Quzhou People's Hospital (Quzhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University), Quzhou, China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Sep 14;13:1005241. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1005241. eCollection 2022.
This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic lung core needle biopsy combined with aspiration biopsy and the clinical value of this combined routine microbial detection.
We retrospectively collected the electronic medical records, CT images, pathology, and other data of 1085 patients with sequential core needle biopsy and aspiration biopsy of the same lung lesion under CT guidance in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2016 to January 2021. GenXpert MTB/RIF detection and BD BACTEC™ Mycobacterium/fungus culture were applied to identifying the microbiological results of these patients. We then compared the positive diagnostic rate, false negative rate, and diagnostic sensitivity rate of three methods including core needle biopsy alone, aspiration biopsy alone, and both core needle biopsy and aspiration biopsy.
The pathological results of cutting histopathology and aspiration of cell wax were examined for 1085 patients. The diagnostic rates of cutting and aspiration pathology were 90.1% (978/1085) and 86.3% (937/1085), respectively, with no significant difference ( > 0.05). Considering both cutting and aspiration pathologies, the diagnostic rate was significantly improved, up to 98% (1063/1085) ( < 0.001). A total of 803 malignant lesions were finally diagnosed (803/1085, 74.0%). The false negative rate by cutting pathology was 11.8% (95/803), which was significantly lower than that by aspiration biopsy [31.1% (250/803), < 0.001]. Compared with core needle biopsy alone, the false negative rate of malignant lesions decreased to 5.6% (45/803) ( < 0.05). Next, the aspirates of the malignant lesions highly suspected of corresponding infection were cultured. The results showed that 16 cases (3.1%, 16/511) were infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, , and , which required clinical treatment. 803 malignant tumors were excluded and 282 cases of benign lesions were diagnosed, including 232 cases of infectious lesions (82.3%, 232/282). The diagnostic rate of Mycobacterium/fungus culture for infectious lesions by aspiration biopsy (47.4%) was significantly higher than that by lung core needle biopsy (22.8%; < 0.001). The diagnostic rate of aspiration biopsy combined with core needle biopsy was 56% (130/232). The parallel diagnostic rate of aspirated biopsy for GenXpert detection and Mycobacterium/fungal culture combined with core needle biopsy was 64.7% (150/232), which was significantly higher than that of lung core needle biopsy alone ( < 0.001). Finally, pulmonary tuberculosis was diagnosed in 90 cases (38.8%) of infectious lesions. Compared with the sensitivity of core needle biopsy to detect tuberculosis (27.8%, 25/90), the sensitivity of aspirating biopsy for GenXpert detection and Mycobacterium/fungal culture was significantly higher, at 70% (63/90) and 56.7% (51/90), respectively. Although there was no significant difference in the sensitivity of aspirated biopsy for GenXpert and Mycobacterium/fungal culture to detect pulmonary tuberculosis, the sensitivity was significantly increased to 83.3% ( < 0.05) when the two tests were combined. Moreover, when aspirated biopsies were combined with GenXpert detection, Mycobacterium/fungus culture, and core needle biopsy, the sensitivity was as high as 90% (81/90).
CT-guided lung aspiration biopsy has a significant supplementary effect on core needle biopsies, which is indispensable in clinical application. Additionally, the combination of aspiration biopsy and core needle biopsy can significantly improve the diagnostic rate of benign and malignant lesions. Aspiration biopsy showed that pulmonary malignant lesions are complicated with pulmonary tuberculosis, aspergillus, and other infections. Finally, the diagnostic ability of lung puncture core needle biopsy and aspiration biopsy combined with routine microbial detection under CT positioning in the diagnosis of pulmonary infectious diseases was significantly improved.
本研究旨在探讨计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下经胸肺芯针活检联合抽吸活检的诊断效能以及这种联合常规微生物检测的临床价值。
回顾性收集2016年1月至2021年1月在温州医科大学附属第一医院接受CT引导下对同一肺病变进行序贯芯针活检和抽吸活检的1085例患者的电子病历、CT图像、病理及其他数据。应用GeneXpert MTB/RIF检测和BD BACTEC™分枝杆菌/真菌培养来确定这些患者的微生物学结果。然后比较单独芯针活检、单独抽吸活检以及芯针活检和抽吸活检三种方法的阳性诊断率、假阴性率和诊断敏感性率。
对1085例患者的切割组织病理学和细胞蜡块抽吸的病理结果进行了检查。切割病理和抽吸病理的诊断率分别为90.1%(978/1085)和86.3%(937/1085),差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。综合考虑切割和抽吸病理,诊断率显著提高,高达98%(1063/1085)(<0.001)。最终确诊803例恶性病变(803/1085,74.0%)。切割病理的假阴性率为11.8%(95/803),显著低于抽吸活检的假阴性率[31.1%(250/803),<0.001]。与单独芯针活检相比,恶性病变的假阴性率降至5.6%(45/803)(<0.05)。接下来,对高度怀疑有相应感染的恶性病变的抽吸物进行培养。结果显示,16例(3.1%,16/511)感染结核分枝杆菌复合群,,和,需要临床治疗。排除803例恶性肿瘤,诊断282例良性病变,其中232例为感染性病变(82.3%,232/282)。抽吸活检对感染性病变的分枝杆菌/真菌培养诊断率(47.4%)显著高于肺芯针活检(22.8%;<0.001)。抽吸活检联合芯针活检的诊断率为56%(130/232)。抽吸活检联合GeneXpert检测及分枝杆菌/真菌培养与芯针活检的平行诊断率为64.7%(150/232),显著高于单独肺芯针活检(<0.001)。最终,90例(38.8%)感染性病变诊断为肺结核。与芯针活检检测肺结核的敏感性(27.8%,25/90)相比,抽吸活检联合GeneXpert检测及分枝杆菌/真菌培养的敏感性显著更高,分别为70%(63/90)和56.7%(51/90)。虽然抽吸活检联合GeneXpert检测及分枝杆菌/真菌培养对检测肺结核的敏感性差异无统计学意义,但两项检测联合时敏感性显著提高至83.3%(<0.05)。此外,当抽吸活检联合GeneXpert检测、分枝杆菌/真菌培养及芯针活检时,敏感性高达90%(81/90)。
CT引导下肺抽吸活检对芯针活检有显著的补充作用,在临床应用中不可或缺。此外,抽吸活检与芯针活检联合可显著提高良恶性病变的诊断率。抽吸活检显示肺恶性病变合并肺结核、曲霉等感染。最后,CT定位下肺穿刺芯针活检和抽吸活检联合常规微生物检测对肺部感染性疾病的诊断能力显著提高。