Suppr超能文献

综合儿科复杂护理的混合方法可行性研究:家长的护理体验及家长参与研究的价值

A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study of Integrated Pediatric Complex Care: Experiences of Parents With Care and the Value of Parent Engagement in Research.

作者信息

Hlyva Oksana, Rae Charlene, Deibert Shelby, Kamran Rakhshan, Shaikh Haniah, Thabane Lehana, Rosenbaum Peter, Klassen Anne, Lim Audrey

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Oct 28;2:710335. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.710335. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Children with medical complexity (CMC) are among the most vulnerable children in society. These children and their families face challenges of fragmented care and are at risk for poorer health outcomes. Families with CMC play a vital role in providing care and navigating the complexities of healthcare systems. It is essential to understand the best ways to engage these families in research to improve the care and optimize the health of CMC. This study explored parent engagement within the context of a feasibility study evaluating an Integrated Tertiary Complex Care (ITCC) clinic created to support CMC closer to home. This paper aimed: (1) to understand the family experiences of care and (2) to explore parent engagement in the study. This mixed-methods feasibility study included three components. First, feedback from focus groups was used to identify the common themes that informed interviews with parents. Second, one-on-one interviews were conducted with parents to explore their experience with care, such as the ITCC clinic, using an interpretative description approach. Third, the questionnaires were completed by parents at baseline and 6-months post-baseline. These questionnaires included demographic and cost information and three validated scales designed to measure the caregiver strain, family-centered care, and parental health. The recruitment rate, percentage completion of the questionnaires, and open-ended comments were used to assess parent engagement in the study. The focus groups involved 24 parents, of which 19 (14 women, five men) provided comments. The findings identified the importance of Complex Care Team (CC Team) accessibility, local access, and family-centered approach to care. The challenges noted were access to homecare nursing, fatigue, and lack of respite affecting caregiver well-being. In this study, 17 parents participated in one-on-one interviews. The identified themes relevant to care experience were proximity, continuity, and coordination of care. The parents who received care through the ITCC clinic appreciated receiving care closer to home. The baseline questionnaires were completed by 44 of 77 (57%) eligible parents. Only 24 (31%) completed the 6-month questionnaire. The challenges with study recruitment and follow-up were identified. Family engagement was a challenging yet necessary endeavor to understand how to tailor the healthcare to meet the complex needs of families caring for CMC.

摘要

患有复杂疾病的儿童(CMC)是社会中最脆弱的儿童群体之一。这些儿童及其家庭面临着医疗服务碎片化的挑战,且健康状况较差的风险较高。患有复杂疾病的儿童家庭在提供护理和应对医疗系统的复杂性方面发挥着至关重要的作用。了解让这些家庭参与研究的最佳方式对于改善护理和优化患有复杂疾病的儿童的健康状况至关重要。本研究在一项可行性研究的背景下探讨了家长参与情况,该可行性研究评估了一家综合三级复杂护理(ITCC)诊所,该诊所旨在为离家更近的患有复杂疾病的儿童提供支持。本文旨在:(1)了解家庭的护理体验;(2)探讨家长在研究中的参与情况。这项混合方法的可行性研究包括三个部分。首先,焦点小组的反馈被用于确定指导对家长进行访谈的共同主题。其次,采用解释性描述方法与家长进行一对一访谈,以探讨他们的护理体验,比如在ITCC诊所的体验。第三,家长在基线时和基线后6个月完成问卷。这些问卷包括人口统计学和费用信息,以及三个经过验证的量表,旨在测量照顾者压力、以家庭为中心的护理和家长健康状况。招募率、问卷完成率和开放式评论被用于评估家长在研究中的参与情况。焦点小组有24位家长参与,其中19位(14名女性,5名男性)发表了意见。研究结果确定了复杂护理团队(CC团队)的可及性、当地就医便利性以及以家庭为中心的护理方法的重要性。指出的挑战包括获得家庭护理服务、疲劳以及缺乏喘息机会对照顾者幸福感的影响。在本研究中,17位家长参与了一对一访谈。确定的与护理体验相关的主题是就医便利性、连续性和护理协调。通过ITCC诊所接受护理的家长对在家附近接受护理表示满意。77位符合条件的家长中有44位(57%)完成了基线问卷。只有24位(31%)完成了6个月的问卷。研究确定了招募和随访方面的挑战。家庭参与是一项具有挑战性但又必要的工作,有助于了解如何调整医疗保健以满足照顾患有复杂疾病的儿童的家庭的复杂需求。

相似文献

3
9

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative evaluation of a hospital-inpatient service for children with medical complexity.
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Mar 5;9(1):e003101. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003101.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives on team communication challenges in caring for children with medical complexity.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06304-8.
2
Let's not go back to 'normal'! lessons from COVID-19 for professionals working in childhood disability.
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Apr;43(7):1022-1028. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1862925. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
4
'You have textbooks; we have story books'. Disability as perceived by professionals and parents.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020 Jun;62(6):660. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14491.
6
Key Population Health Outcomes for Children with Medical Complexity: A Systematic Review.
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Sep;23(9):1167-1176. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02752-1.
7
Family-provider consensus outcomes for children with medical complexity.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Sep;61(9):1093-1100. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14110. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
8
Engaging with patients on research to inform better care.
CMAJ. 2018 Nov 7;190(Suppl):S6-S8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180816.
9
Mobile Complex Care Plans to Enhance Parental Engagement for Children With Medical Complexity.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2019 Jan;58(1):34-41. doi: 10.1177/0009922818805241. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
10
Models of Care Delivery for Children With Medical Complexity.
Pediatrics. 2018 Mar;141(Suppl 3):S212-S223. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1284F.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验