Children's Hospital of Wisconsin and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital and Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention (CPOP), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California; and.
Pediatrics. 2018 Mar;141(Suppl 3):S212-S223. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1284F.
Children with medical complexity (CMC) are a subset of children and youth with special health care needs with high resource use and health care costs. Novel care delivery models in which care coordination and other services to CMC are provided are a focus of national and local health care and policy initiatives. Current models of care for CMC can be grouped into 3 main categories: (1) primary care-centered models, (2) consultative- or comanagement-centered models, and (3) episode-based models. Each model has unique advantages and disadvantages. Evaluations of these models have demonstrated positive outcomes, but most studies have limited generalizability for broader populations of CMC. A lack of standardized outcomes and population definitions for CMC hinders assessment of the comparative effectiveness of different models of care and identification of which components of the models lead to positive outcomes. Ongoing challenges include inadequate support for family caregivers and threats to the sustainability of models of care. Collaboration among key stakeholders (patients, families, providers, payers, and policy makers) is needed to address the gaps in care and create best practice guidelines to ensure the delivery of high-value care for CMC.
患有复杂疾病的儿童(CMC)是有特殊医疗需求的儿童和青少年的一个亚组,他们需要大量的资源和医疗保健费用。新型的护理提供模式,即协调护理和向 CMC 提供其他服务,是国家和地方医疗保健和政策倡议的重点。CMC 的当前护理模式可分为 3 大类:(1)以初级保健为中心的模式,(2)以咨询或共同管理为中心的模式,和(3)基于疾病发作的模式。每种模式都有独特的优点和缺点。这些模式的评估显示出积极的结果,但大多数研究对更广泛的 CMC 人群的普遍性有限。缺乏标准化的结果和 CMC 的人群定义阻碍了对不同护理模式的比较效果的评估,也无法确定模式的哪些组成部分导致了积极的结果。持续存在的挑战包括对家庭照顾者的支持不足和对护理模式可持续性的威胁。需要关键利益相关者(患者、家庭、提供者、支付者和政策制定者)之间的合作,以解决护理差距,并制定最佳实践指南,以确保为 CMC 提供高价值的护理。