• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Methodological Challenges in Predicting Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review.预测人工关节感染治疗结果中的方法学挑战:一项叙述性综述。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jul 11;3:824281. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.824281. eCollection 2022.
2
Development of a Preoperative Risk Calculator for Reinfection Following Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.翻修术后假体周围关节感染再感染的术前风险计算器的开发。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):693-699. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
3
Machine learning models accurately predict recurrent infection following revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection.机器学习模型能够准确预测假体周围关节感染翻修全膝关节置换术后的复发感染。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2582-2590. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06794-3. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
Irrigation, Débridement, and Implant Retention for Recurrence of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.一期翻修治疗全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染翻修术后复发的冲洗、清创和假体保留:一项匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1772-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
5
Outcomes of revision arthroplasty for shoulder periprosthetic joint infection: a three-stage revision protocol.肩假体周围关节感染翻修术的结果:三阶段翻修方案。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Feb;28(2):268-275. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
6
Management of Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection.人工髋关节周围感染的管理
Hip Pelvis. 2015 Jun;27(2):63-71. doi: 10.5371/hp.2015.27.2.63. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
7
Outcome of Revision Surgery for Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results of 3 Surgical Strategies.全膝关节置换术后感染翻修手术的结果:三种手术策略的结果
JBJS Rev. 2019 Jun;7(6):e4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00084.
8
Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty Is a Favorable Treatment Option Upon Diagnosis of a Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection.二期关节置换术是诊断为真菌性假体周围关节感染时的一种有利治疗选择。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Nov;33(11):3555-3560. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
9
Surgery Before Subspecialty Referral for Periprosthetic Knee Infection Reduces the Likelihood of Infection Control.术前转至亚专科治疗可降低假体周围膝关节感染的感染控制率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):1995-2002. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000423.
10
Treatment of elbow periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review of clinical outcomes.治疗人工肘关节假体周围关节感染:临床疗效的系统评价。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Feb;29(2):411-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Haematogenous Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection by Streptococcus canis Treated by Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention: A Case Report.经清创、抗生素治疗及保留植入物治疗犬链球菌引起的急性血源性翻修全膝关节置换术感染:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Apr 14;16(4):e58247. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58247. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Validation of a Classification System for Optimal Application of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Prosthetic Joint Infections following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Review.全膝关节置换术后假体关节感染清创、抗生素及植入物保留最佳应用分类系统的验证:一项回顾性研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;13(1):48. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010048.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Scores and Machine Learning to Identify Patients With Acute Periprosthetic Joints Infections That Will Likely Fail Classical Irrigation and Debridement.风险评分与机器学习用于识别可能无法通过传统清创术治疗成功的急性人工关节感染患者。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 3;8:550095. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.550095. eCollection 2021.
2
Debridement, antibiotics, irrigation and retention in prosthetic joint infection : predictive tools of failure.清创术、抗生素、灌洗和保留在人工关节感染中的应用:失败的预测工具。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2020 Dec;86(4):636-643.
3
Accuracy of Predictive Algorithms in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR).预测算法在全髋关节和膝关节置换术急性假体周围关节感染中的准确性,这些感染采用清创术、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)治疗。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7):2558-2566. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.039. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
4
External Validation Demonstrates Limited Clinical Utility of a Preoperative Prognostic Calculator for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.术前预后计算器对人工关节置换术后感染的临床应用价值有限:外部验证研究
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7):2541-2545. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.067. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
5
External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb.临床预测模型的外部验证:基于模拟的样本量计算比经验法则更可靠。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;135:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
6
Projected Economic Burden of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip and Knee in the United States.美国人工髋关节和膝关节置换术后假体周围感染的预期经济负担。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 May;36(5):1484-1489.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
7
Development of a Preoperative Risk Calculator for Reinfection Following Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.翻修术后假体周围关节感染再感染的术前风险计算器的开发。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):693-699. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
8
2020 Frank Stinchfield Award: Identifying who will fail following irrigation and debridement for prosthetic joint infection.2020 年弗兰克·斯廷奇菲尔德奖:识别哪些患者在接受关节假体感染清创灌洗术后会失败。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul;102-B(7_Supple_B):11-19. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1628.R1.
9
Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model.计算开发临床预测模型所需的样本量。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m441.
10
Prognostic models for outcome prediction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and critical appraisal.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者结局预测的预后模型:系统评价和批判性评估。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 4;367:l5358. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5358.

预测人工关节感染治疗结果中的方法学挑战:一项叙述性综述。

Methodological Challenges in Predicting Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

作者信息

Naufal Elise, Wouthuyzen-Bakker Marjan, Babazadeh Sina, Stevens Jarrad, Choong Peter F M, Dowsey Michelle M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.

Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jul 11;3:824281. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.824281. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fresc.2022.824281
PMID:36188976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9397789/
Abstract

The management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) generally requires both surgical intervention and targeted antimicrobial therapy. Decisions regarding surgical management-whether it be irrigation and debridement, one-stage revision, or two-stage revision-must take into consideration an array of factors. These include the timing and duration of symptoms, clinical characteristics of the patient, and antimicrobial susceptibilities of the microorganism(s) involved. Moreover, decisions relating to surgical management must consider clinical factors associated with the health of the patient, alongside the patient's preferences. These decisions are further complicated by concerns beyond mere eradication of the infection, such as the level of improvement in quality of life related to management strategies. To better understand the probability of successful surgical treatment of a PJI, several predictive tools have been developed over the past decade. This narrative review provides an overview of available clinical prediction models that aim to guide treatment decisions for patients with periprosthetic joint infection, and highlights key challenges to reliably implementing these tools in clinical practice.

摘要

人工关节周围感染(PJI)的管理通常需要手术干预和针对性的抗菌治疗。关于手术管理的决策——无论是冲洗清创、一期翻修还是二期翻修——都必须考虑一系列因素。这些因素包括症状出现的时间和持续时间、患者的临床特征以及所涉及微生物的抗菌药敏情况。此外,与手术管理相关的决策必须在考虑患者偏好的同时,兼顾与患者健康相关的临床因素。除了单纯根除感染之外,诸如与管理策略相关的生活质量改善水平等问题,使这些决策更加复杂。为了更好地了解PJI手术治疗成功的可能性,在过去十年中已经开发了几种预测工具。本叙述性综述概述了旨在指导人工关节周围感染患者治疗决策的现有临床预测模型,并强调了在临床实践中可靠应用这些工具的关键挑战。