The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
J Hum Lact. 2023 Feb;39(1):107-118. doi: 10.1177/08903344221125129. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
There are different approaches to breastfeeding interventions, but the global 6-month exclusive breastfeeding rates remain suboptimal. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought extra difficulties in promoting breastfeeding.
To test the feasibility and effectiveness of a theory-based, real-time online educational and support program for breastfeeding related outcomes.
An assessor-blinded, prospective pilot randomized controlled trial with parallel-group, repeated-measures design was used. The sample was low-risk primiparous mothers ( = 40) who delivered in the local public hospitals. Study outcomes consisted of exclusive breastfeeding rate, breastfeeding self-efficacy, and other breastfeeding outcomes measured by a self-reported questionnaire, including the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Comparisons between the differences in the intervention and control groups were carried out.
Thirteen participants in the intervention group successfully completed the program. They had a higher exclusive breastfeeding rate, breastfeeding self-efficacy, breastfeeding initiation rate, and longer exclusive breastfeeding duration than the control group. Additionally, the intervention group had a lower partial breastfeeding rate, and a higher maternal postnatal depression score and infant's morbidity at postnatal 2 months. However, all the results were not statistically significant ( > .050). Overall, the intervention was highly valued by all participants who appreciated the regular postnatal follow-ups.
Despite showing the satisfactory feasibility of the program, no significant improvements were found in all study outcomes. Considering the participants' comments, we suggest refining and further testing the intervention with a larger sample size over a longer-term follow-up to confirm its effectiveness.This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04741425).
母乳喂养干预措施有多种方法,但全球 6 个月纯母乳喂养率仍不理想。COVID-19 大流行给促进母乳喂养带来了额外的困难。
测试一种基于理论的、实时在线教育和支持母乳喂养相关结果的方案的可行性和有效性。
采用评估员设盲、前瞻性、随机对照、平行组、重复测量设计的试点随机对照试验。样本为低风险初产妇(n=40),在当地公立医院分娩。研究结果包括纯母乳喂养率、母乳喂养自我效能感和其他母乳喂养结果,通过自我报告问卷进行评估,包括母乳喂养自我效能量表和爱丁堡产后抑郁量表。对干预组和对照组之间的差异进行比较。
干预组的 13 名参与者成功完成了该方案。与对照组相比,他们的纯母乳喂养率、母乳喂养自我效能感更高,母乳喂养起始率更高,纯母乳喂养时间更长。此外,干预组的部分母乳喂养率更低,产后 2 个月时母亲的产后抑郁评分和婴儿发病率更高。然而,所有结果均无统计学意义(>.050)。总体而言,该干预措施得到了所有参与者的高度评价,他们非常赞赏定期的产后随访。
尽管该方案具有令人满意的可行性,但所有研究结果均未发现显著改善。考虑到参与者的意见,我们建议进一步细化和测试该方案,以更大的样本量和更长的随访时间来确认其有效性。本研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04741425)注册。