Assessing functional sympatholysis during rhythmic handgrip exercise using Doppler ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy: sex differences and test-retest reliability.

The effects of sympathetic activity on vasoconstriction are dampened in active skeletal muscle during exercise, a phenomenon termed functional sympatholysis. Limited work has examined the influence of sex on the magnitude of sympatholysis or the test-retest reliability of measurements. In 16 women and 15 men, forearm blood flow (FBF; Doppler ultrasound), muscle oxygenation (near-infrared spectroscopy, NIRS), and beat-to-beat mean arterial pressure (MAP; photoplethysmography) were measured during lower-body negative pressure (LBNP; -20 mmHg) at rest and simultaneously during rhythmic handgrip exercise (30% maximum contraction). Measures were taken twice within the same visit (separated by 15 min) and repeated on a second visit. Forearm vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FBF/MAP. The magnitude of sympatholysis was calculated as the difference of LBNP-induced changes between handgrip and rest. LBNP decreased FBF (Δ-45 ± 15%), FVC (Δ-45 ± 16%), and muscle oxygenation (Δ-14 ± 11%); however, these responses were attenuated when LBNP was applied during rhythmic handgrip exercise (Δ-7 ± 9%, Δ-9 ± 10%, and Δ-6 ± 9%, respectively). The magnitude of sympatholysis was not different between men and women (FBF: 40 ± 16% vs. 35 ± 9%, = 0.37; FVC: 38 ± 16% vs. 35 ± 11%, = 0.53; muscle oxygenation: 5 ± 9% vs. 11 ± 10%, = 0.11). Furthermore, sympatholysis measurements demonstrated good to excellent intraday (intraclass-correlation coefficients; ICC ≥ 0.85) and interday (ICC ≥ 0.72) test-retest reliability (all ≤ 0.01) in both sexes. The coefficients of variation were larger with NIRS (68-91%) than with Doppler ultrasound (16%-22%) assessments of functional sympatholysis. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that assessments of functional sympatholysis are not impacted by biological sex and that Doppler ultrasound-derived measures of sympatholysis have better within-subject reliability than NIRS-derived measures in young healthy adults.