From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, 676 N St. Clair St, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611 (P.E., M.S., A.M., Y.M., A. Reiland, B.T., R. Salem, A. Riaz); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Ill (S.R.); and Department of Radiology, Sectional of Interventional Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif (R. Srinivasa).
Radiographics. 2022 Oct;42(6):1845-1860. doi: 10.1148/rg.220013.
Endoscopy can improve guidance in nonvascular procedures performed by interventional radiologists (IRs). Historically, the major limiting factors preventing the widespread use of endoscopic tools by IRs were the large diameter (>20F) and length of the endoscopes. IRs had to significantly upsize their access into vascular organs such as the kidney and liver to allow endoscope placement. With the advent of newer endoscopes with sizes smaller than 11F (approximately 4 mm in diameter), percutaneous endoscopy has become more feasible than before. IRs routinely place percutaneous drains (eg, abscess drains, biliary drains, percutaneous nephrostomies, and percutaneous cholecystostomies). Once the drain is in position and the acute infection (if present) has resolved, the IR can use the percutaneous access to perform image-guided and endoscopically guided procedures, depending on the clinical situation. Most percutaneous image- and endoscopically guided interventions performed by IRs involve procedures for biliary and gallbladder pathologic conditions. Image-guided procedures with additional endoscopic guidance can also be used to manage urinary, gastrointestinal, and gynecologic pathologic conditions. The authors review the current applications and techniques of percutaneous endoscopy in interventional radiology. In unique situations, IRs can also perform endoscopy through natural orifices (eg, the urethra) or surgically created orifices (eg, urostomies). The authors also discuss the adjunctive techniques that are enhanced or made possible because of endoscopy in interventional radiology, including but not limited to endoscopic forceps biopsies, endobiliary ablation, laser stricturotomy, lithotripsy, and stone extraction. RSNA, 2022.
内镜检查可以提高介入放射学家(IR)进行的非血管操作的指导能力。从历史上看,阻止 IR 广泛使用内镜工具的主要限制因素是内镜的直径(>20F)和长度较大。IR 必须显著增大其进入肾脏和肝脏等血管器官的通道,以允许放置内镜。随着直径小于 11F(约 4 毫米)的新型内镜的出现,经皮内镜检查变得比以前更加可行。IR 通常放置经皮引流管(例如,脓肿引流管、胆管引流管、经皮肾造口术和经皮胆囊造口术)。一旦引流管就位,急性感染(如果存在)得到解决,IR 可以根据临床情况使用经皮通道进行影像引导和内镜引导的操作。IR 进行的大多数经皮影像和内镜引导介入操作都涉及胆道和胆囊病理情况的程序。有附加内镜引导的影像引导程序也可用于管理泌尿、胃肠和妇科病理情况。作者回顾了经皮内镜在介入放射学中的当前应用和技术。在特殊情况下,IR 也可以通过自然孔道(例如尿道)或手术创建的孔道(例如尿流改道术)进行内镜检查。作者还讨论了由于介入放射学中的内镜而增强或成为可能的辅助技术,包括但不限于内镜活检钳活检、经内镜胆管消融、激光狭窄切开术、碎石术和结石取出术。RSNA,2022 年。