Association of Baseline Frailty Status and Age With Postoperative Complications After Cochlear Implantation: A National Inpatient Sample Study.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a national registry-based evaluation of the independent associations of chronological age and frailty, as measured by 5- and 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5, mFI-11) score, on postoperative outcomes of participants undergoing cochlear implantation (CI).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING

Multicenter national database.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults 18 years or older who underwent CI during 2001 to 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Any postoperative complications (determined as the presence of major, minor, or implant-specific), extended hospital length of stay (eLOS) (≥75th percentile of study population), and nonhome discharge destination.

RESULTS

There were 5,130 participants included with a median age of 60 years (interquartile range, 44-73 y) and slight female predominance (53.5%). Under mFI-5 scoring, there were 2,979 (58.1%) robust (mFI-5 = 0), 1710 (33.3%) prefrail (mFI-5 = 1), 362 (7.1%) frail (mFI-5 = 2), and 78 (1.5%) severely frail (mFI-5 ≥ 3) participants. Three hundred twenty-eight (6.49%) participants experienced a postoperative complication, with 320 (6.2%) discharged to a nonhome destination. Multivariate analysis showed no statistically significant correlation between increasing participant age or frailty status and postoperative complications; however, increasing baseline frailty tier showed an independent association with risk of eLOS (severely frail: odds ratio, 4..83; 95% confidence interval, 3.00-7.75; p < 0.001) and nonhome discharge (severely frail: odds ratio, 6.51; 95% confidence interval, 3.81-11.11; p < 0.001). The mFI-11 showed very similar trends.

CONCLUSION

Among those evaluated, this study demonstrates that CI is a low-risk procedure in participants of all ages. Increasing frailty does not predispose to postoperative complications. However, frail patients are at additional risk for an eLOS and nonhome discharge. Short follow-up time, hospital-coding errors, and selection bias of more robust patients may limit the true results of this study.