Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Sep;15(9):858-863. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019004. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
Transradial artery access (TRA) for neurointerventional procedures is gaining widespread acceptance. However, complications that were previously rare may arise as TRA procedures increase. Here we report a series of retained catheter cases with a literature review.
All patients who underwent a neurointerventional procedure during a 23-month period at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed for a retained catheter in TRA cases. In cases of retained catheters, imaging was reviewed for anatomical variances in the radial artery, and clinical and demographic case details were analyzed.
A total of 1386 nondiagnostic neurointerventional procedures were performed during the study period, 631 (46%) initially via TRA. The 631 TRA cases were performed for aneurysm embolization (n=221, 35%), mechanical thrombectomy (n=116, 18%), carotid stent/angioplasty (n=40, 6%), arteriovenous malformation embolization (n=38, 6%), and other reasons (n=216, 34%). Thirty-nine (6%) TRA procedures crossed over to femoral access, most commonly because the artery of interest could not be catheterized (26/39, 67%). A retained catheter was identified in five cases (1%), and one (0.2%) patient had an entrapped catheter that was recovered. All six patients with a retained or entrapped catheter had aberrant radial anatomy.
Retained catheters for neurointerventional procedures performed via TRA are rare. However, this complication may be associated with variant radial anatomy. With the increased use of TRA for neurointerventional procedures, awareness of anatomical abnormalities that may lead to a retained catheter is necessary. We propose a simple protocol to avoid catheter entrapment, including in emergent situations such as TRA for stroke thrombectomy.
经桡动脉入路(TRA)在神经介入手术中越来越被广泛接受。然而,随着 TRA 手术的增加,以前很少见的并发症可能会出现。在此,我们报告了一系列留置导管的病例,并进行了文献回顾。
在一家机构进行的 23 个月期间,对所有接受神经介入手术的患者进行回顾性分析,以确定 TRA 病例中是否存在留置导管。对于留置导管的病例,对桡动脉的解剖变异进行影像学检查,并分析临床和人口统计学病例细节。
研究期间共进行了 1386 例非诊断性神经介入手术,其中 631 例(46%)最初通过 TRA 进行。631 例 TRA 病例分别用于动脉瘤栓塞术(n=221,35%)、机械血栓切除术(n=116,18%)、颈动脉支架/血管成形术(n=40,6%)、动静脉畸形栓塞术(n=38,6%)和其他原因(n=216,34%)。39 例(6%)TRA 手术转为股动脉入路,最常见的原因是目标动脉无法置管(26/39,67%)。在 5 例(1%)中发现留置导管,1 例(0.2%)患者的导管被夹住并取出。所有 6 例留置或夹住导管的患者均存在桡动脉解剖异常。
TRA 进行的神经介入手术中留置导管很少见。然而,这种并发症可能与桡动脉的变异解剖有关。随着 TRA 在神经介入手术中的应用增加,需要了解可能导致留置导管的解剖异常。我们提出了一种简单的方案来避免导管夹闭,包括在 TRA 治疗中风取栓术等紧急情况下。