Ward Krista L, Smith Monica
Research Department, Life Chiropractic College West, Hayward, California.
Research Department, Life Chiropractic College West, Hayward, California.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2022 Jun;45(5):315-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
The purpose of this study was to assess the association between patients in the United States seeing a chiropractor and receiving an opioid prescription for back or neck pain.
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (Years 2012 to 2015) respondents for longitudinal panels 17 to 19 who participated in all 5 rounds were at least 18 years of age, did not have cancer, and reported back or neck pain. We defined chiropractic users as participants reporting at least 1 chiropractic visit for back or neck pain and opioid users as participants reporting purchase or receipt of a prescription classified as Multum Lexicon "60" and "191" for back or neck pain. We adjusted for socioeconomic and clinical variables using multiple logistic regression.
The sample contained 4686 people, 21% of whom reported an opioid prescription for back or neck pain. Among opioid users, 14% reported a chiropractic visit for back or neck pain compared to 31% of nonopioid users. The adjusted odds ratio for chiropractic use among opioid users compared to nonopioid users was 0.46 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.57).
Patients with back or neck pain who saw a chiropractor had approximately half the odds of reporting an opioid prescription compared to those who did not see a chiropractor.
本研究旨在评估美国看脊椎按摩师的患者与因背部或颈部疼痛而接受阿片类药物处方之间的关联。
医疗支出小组调查(2012年至2015年)中参与了全部5轮调查的纵向小组17至19的受访者年龄至少为18岁,没有患癌症,并报告有背部或颈部疼痛。我们将脊椎按摩疗法使用者定义为报告因背部或颈部疼痛至少进行过1次脊椎按摩治疗的参与者,将阿片类药物使用者定义为报告购买或收到分类为Multum Lexicon “60”和“191”用于背部或颈部疼痛的处方的参与者。我们使用多元逻辑回归对社会经济和临床变量进行了调整。
样本包含4686人,其中21%报告因背部或颈部疼痛开具了阿片类药物处方。在阿片类药物使用者中,14%报告因背部或颈部疼痛进行过脊椎按摩治疗,而非阿片类药物使用者中这一比例为31%。与非阿片类药物使用者相比,阿片类药物使用者中使用脊椎按摩疗法的调整后优势比为0.46(95%置信区间,0.36 - 0.57)。
与未看脊椎按摩师的患者相比,因背部或颈部疼痛而看脊椎按摩师的患者开具阿片类药物处方的几率约为其一半。