Giusti Nick E, Carder Seth L, Wolf Megan, Vopat Lisa, Baker Jordan, Tarakemeh Armin, Bal Kelly, Randall Jeffrey, Vopat Bryan G
Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Department of Orthopaedics, The University of West Virginia Medical Center, Morgantown, WV.
Kans J Med. 2022 Sep 21;15(3):325-330. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.17784. eCollection 2022.
The prevalence of athletes who specialize in sports has increased in recent years. Substantial literature on youth sports has linked early sport specialization to negative consequences, such as burnout and injury. However, empirical evidence comparing rates of burnout and specialization in NCAA athletes is limited. The purpose of this study was to survey current NCAA Division I student-athletes to compare levels of burnout to sex, year of NCAA eligibility, and age at the beginning of sport specialization.
A self-reported survey was distributed to student-athletes at two NCAA Division I institutions, which included demographics, sport specialization history, injury history, and the Athlete Burnout Questionnaire. Results from the three measures of the Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (reduced sense of accomplishment, exhaustion, sport devaluation) were compared to sex, year of NCAA eligibility, age of beginning sport specialization, and injury history.
A total of 267 athletes (95 males and 172 females) completed the survey. Of those, 156 (58.4%) were in their first or second year of NCAA eligibility, and 111 (41.6%) were in their third, fourth, or fifth year. Of the total, 121 (46.4%) reported specializing before the age of 15, and 140 (53.6%) specialized at age 16 or older. Females reported significantly higher levels of exhaustion than males (Difference of means (M) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.20, 0.66], p < 0.01). Athletes in their third, fourth, or fifth year of eligibility reported significantly higher levels of sport devaluation (M = 0.27, 95% CI = [0.05, 0.48], p < 0.05) than athletes in their first or second year. Athletes who specialized before age 15 did not report significantly higher levels of burnout than athletes who specialized at age 16 or later. In total, 203 athletes (77.2%) reported experiencing any injury. Athletes who reported a history of experiencing any injury demonstrated significantly higher feelings of reduced sense of accomplishment than athletes with no injury history (Difference of means (M) = 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.03, 0.45], p < 0.05).
Athletes were more likely to experience elevated levels of burnout if they reported female sex, older NCAA eligibility, or a past injury history. However, athletes were not more likely to experience increased burnout based on age of beginning specialization. The results demonstrated a need to address burnout in athletes following injury and to be aware that females and older athletes are more prone to burnout.
近年来,专门从事某项运动的运动员数量有所增加。大量关于青少年体育运动的文献将早期运动专项化与诸如倦怠和受伤等负面后果联系起来。然而,比较美国大学体育协会(NCAA)运动员倦怠率和专项化率的实证证据有限。本研究的目的是对当前NCAA一级联盟的学生运动员进行调查,以比较倦怠程度与性别、NCAA资格年限以及开始专项化运动时的年龄之间的关系。
向两所NCAA一级联盟院校的学生运动员发放了一份自我报告调查问卷,内容包括人口统计学信息、运动专项化历史、受伤历史以及运动员倦怠问卷。将运动员倦怠问卷的三项指标(成就感降低、疲惫、运动贬值)的结果与性别、NCAA资格年限、开始专项化运动的年龄以及受伤历史进行比较。
共有267名运动员(95名男性和172名女性)完成了调查。其中,156名(58.4%)处于NCAA资格的第一年或第二年,111名(41.6%)处于第三、第四或第五年。在总数中,121名(46.4%)报告在15岁之前开始专项化运动,140名(53.6%)在16岁或更晚开始专项化运动。女性报告的疲惫程度明显高于男性(平均差(M)=0.43,95%置信区间(CI)=[0.20,0.66],p<0.01)。处于资格第三、第四或第五年的运动员报告的运动贬值程度明显高于处于第一年或第二年的运动员(M=0.27,95%CI=[0.05,0.48],p<0.05)。15岁之前开始专项化运动的运动员报告的倦怠程度并不明显高于16岁或更晚开始专项化运动的运动员。总共有203名运动员(77.2%)报告曾受过伤。报告有任何受伤史的运动员表现出的成就感降低感明显高于没有受伤史的运动员(平均差(M)=0.24,95%置信区间(CI)=[0.03,0.45],p<0.05)。
如果运动员报告为女性、NCAA资格年限较大或有过去的受伤史,则他们更有可能经历较高水平的倦怠。然而,根据开始专项化运动的年龄,运动员经历倦怠增加的可能性并不更高。结果表明有必要关注受伤后运动员的倦怠问题,并意识到女性和年龄较大的运动员更容易产生倦怠。