• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智利城市固体废物管理生态效率的影响因素:双 bootstrap 方法。

Factors influencing eco-efficiency of municipal solid waste management in Chile: A double-bootstrap approach.

机构信息

Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Ambiental, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Departamento de Matemáticas para la Economía y la Empresa, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Waste Manag Res. 2023 Feb;41(2):457-466. doi: 10.1177/0734242X221122514. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1177/0734242X221122514
PMID:36196845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9925897/
Abstract

Improving eco-efficiency in the provision of municipal solid waste plays an important role for a sustainable economy. Eco-efficiency of municipal solid waste service providers (MSWSPs) has been generally assessed using the conventional data envelopment analysis (DEA) method. However, this approach is sensitive to data noise and has no statistical properties. To overcome these limitations, in this paper, we adopt the double-bootstrap DEA model to derive robust eco-efficiency scores. This nonparametric method allows conducting statistical inference to explore environmental factors affecting the eco-efficiency of MSWSPs. The empirical approach focused on a sample of 298 MSWSPs in Chile, a middle-income country whose policies for promoting waste recycling are incipient. The results indicated that based on the bias-corrected eco-efficiency scores, the potential saving in costs and unsorted waste could be up to 37.8% on average to generate the same level of output (recycled waste). The findings showed that dealing with data noise and uncertainly is of great importance when conducting benchmarking analysis. The region where the municipality is located, tourism, population density and waste per capita are environmental variables that significantly influenced eco-efficiency of Chilean MSWSPs. Several policy implications are discussed based on the findings of this study.

摘要

提高城市固体废物处理的生态效率对可持续经济至关重要。城市固体废物服务提供商(MSWSP)的生态效率通常使用传统的数据包络分析(DEA)方法进行评估。然而,这种方法对数据噪声敏感,且没有统计特性。为了克服这些局限性,本文采用双 bootstrap DEA 模型来获得稳健的生态效率得分。这种非参数方法允许进行统计推断,以探索影响 MSWSP 生态效率的环境因素。实证方法的重点是智利 298 家 MSWSP 的样本,智利是一个中等收入国家,其促进废物回收的政策才刚刚起步。结果表明,基于纠偏后的生态效率得分,平均而言,为了产生相同水平的产出(可回收废物),成本和未分类废物的潜在节省可达 37.8%。研究结果表明,在进行基准分析时,处理数据噪声和不确定性非常重要。城市所在地区、旅游业、人口密度和人均废物量是显著影响智利 MSWSP 生态效率的环境变量。本文根据研究结果讨论了若干政策含义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011a/9925897/6a4625930944/10.1177_0734242X221122514-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011a/9925897/4056790e4662/10.1177_0734242X221122514-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011a/9925897/32c3a33b2ad1/10.1177_0734242X221122514-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011a/9925897/9a8eef4ade3e/10.1177_0734242X221122514-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011a/9925897/67ae238ad51f/10.1177_0734242X221122514-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011a/9925897/6a4625930944/10.1177_0734242X221122514-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011a/9925897/4056790e4662/10.1177_0734242X221122514-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011a/9925897/32c3a33b2ad1/10.1177_0734242X221122514-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011a/9925897/9a8eef4ade3e/10.1177_0734242X221122514-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011a/9925897/67ae238ad51f/10.1177_0734242X221122514-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011a/9925897/6a4625930944/10.1177_0734242X221122514-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors influencing eco-efficiency of municipal solid waste management in Chile: A double-bootstrap approach.智利城市固体废物管理生态效率的影响因素:双 bootstrap 方法。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Feb;41(2):457-466. doi: 10.1177/0734242X221122514. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
2
Evaluation of economies of scale in eco-efficiency of municipal waste management: an empirical approach for Chile.评估城市废物管理生态效率的规模经济:智利的实证方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(22):28337-28348. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12529-1. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Eco-efficiency assessment of municipal solid waste services: Influence of exogenous variables.城市固体废物服务的生态效率评估:外部变量的影响
Waste Manag. 2021 Jul 1;130:136-146. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
4
The eco-efficiency of municipalities in the recycling of solid waste: A stochastic semi-parametric envelopment of data approach.城市固体废物回收的生态效率:随机半参数数据包络分析方法。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 May;41(5):1036-1045. doi: 10.1177/0734242X221142223. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
Monetary valuation of unsorted waste: A shadow price approach.未分类废物的货币估值:一种影子价格方法。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 1;325(Pt B):116668. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116668. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
6
How much does it cost to collect recyclable and residual waste in medium-income countries? A case study in the Chilean waste sector.中低收入国家收集可回收和残余废物的成本是多少?智利废物部门的案例研究。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2022 Oct;72(10):1083-1094. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2022.2083722. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
7
Factors affecting eco-efficiency of municipal waste services in Tuscan municipalities: An empirical investigation of different management models.影响托斯卡纳市市政废物服务生态效率的因素:对不同管理模式的实证研究。
Waste Manag. 2020 Mar 15;105:384-394. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
8
The efficiency of municipal solid waste collection in Mexico.墨西哥城市固体废物收集的效率。
Waste Manag. 2021 Sep;133:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
9
Benchmarking the efficiency of the Chilean water and sewerage companies: a double-bootstrap approach.对智利水和污水公司效率的基准测试:双 bootstrap 方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Mar;25(9):8432-8440. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1149-x. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
10
Eco-Efficiency Analysis for the Russian Cities along the Northern Sea Route: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach Using an Epsilon-Based Measure Model.基于ε-基测度模型的数据包络分析方法在北极航线沿线俄罗斯城市的生态效率分析中的应用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 5;18(11):6097. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116097.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing performance in municipal solid waste management - A case study of Czech municipalities.影响城市固体废物管理绩效的因素——以捷克市为例。
Waste Manag. 2022 Feb 15;139:227-249. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.022. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
2
Performance and its determinants in the Portuguese municipal solid waste utilities.葡萄牙城市固体废物处理企业的绩效及其决定因素。
Waste Manag. 2022 Feb 15;139:70-84. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.020. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
3
Poor performance in municipal recycling: The case of Chile.
城市回收表现不佳:智利案例。
Waste Manag. 2021 Sep;133:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.07.021. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
4
Eco-efficiency assessment of municipal solid waste services: Influence of exogenous variables.城市固体废物服务的生态效率评估:外部变量的影响
Waste Manag. 2021 Jul 1;130:136-146. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
5
Evaluation of economies of scale in eco-efficiency of municipal waste management: an empirical approach for Chile.评估城市废物管理生态效率的规模经济:智利的实证方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(22):28337-28348. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12529-1. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Waste services' performance assessment: The case of Tuscany, Italy.废物处理服务绩效评估:以意大利托斯卡纳为例。
Waste Manag. 2020 Dec;118:573-584. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.057. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
7
A stochastic frontier analysis of the efficiency of municipal solid waste collection services in China.中国城市固体废物收集服务效率的随机前沿分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 15;743:140707. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140707. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
8
Factors affecting eco-efficiency of municipal waste services in Tuscan municipalities: An empirical investigation of different management models.影响托斯卡纳市市政废物服务生态效率的因素:对不同管理模式的实证研究。
Waste Manag. 2020 Mar 15;105:384-394. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
9
Waste management and competitiveness of firms in Europe: A stochastic frontier approach.欧洲企业的废物管理与竞争力:一种随机前沿方法。
Waste Manag. 2020 Feb 1;102:528-540. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.021. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
10
Identifying the most relevant peers for benchmarking waste management performance: A conditional directional distance Benefit-of-the-Doubt approach.识别最相关的同行以进行基准化废物管理绩效评估:有条件定向距离法。
Waste Manag. 2019 Apr 15;89:418-429. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 18.