Barber Fedricker D, Campbell Erick, Yamamura Yuko, Patterson Clover J, Hartnett Audrey C, Kinahan Holly, Miller Victoria A, Brink Amanda L, Poullard Anna, Urschel Gabriele E, Brantley Andre, Cepeda Isabel G, Goswami Poonam, Charles Sheena, Philip Shincy, Bresser Sara, Musekiwa-Adjei Sandra, Perez Nageli, Le Hung, Phillips Penny, Subbiah Vivek, Meric-Bernstam Funda, Dumbrava Ecaterina E
Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Clinical Center for Targeted Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2022 Sep;13(7):664-672. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2022.13.7.2. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
Advanced practice providers (APPs) play important roles in enrolling, educating, and caring for patients in clinical trials. However, much remains unknown about the role of APPs in managing adverse events (AEs) in early (phase I to II) clinical trials. In this study, we assessed the outpatient management of grade 3 to 4 AEs by APPs in early trials and characterized the workflow of our APP Phase I to II Fast Track (FT) Clinic.
We retrospectively reviewed records of patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors enrolled in phase I to II clinical trials who were seen by APPs from September 2017 to August 2018 in the APP phase I to II FT clinic in the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics.
A total of 808 patients enrolled in 159 clinical trials were seen in 2,697 visits (median 3 visits per patient; range 1-28) by 10 APPs. Treatment was interrupted in 6.9% of visits, and grade 3 to 4 AEs were seen in 5.4% of visits; however, patients from 1.4% of visits were sent to the emergency center (EC) and/or admitted. Patients referred to the EC and/or admitted were more likely to have baseline hypoalbuminemia, high lactate dehydrogenase, and poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (i.e., ECOG > 1; < .001). There were no associations between EC referral and gender, APP years of experience, or type of treatment.
The APP Phase I to II FT Clinic has an important role in the management of AEs by APPs in early clinical trials in the outpatient setting, potentially avoiding EC visits and admissions.
高级执业提供者(APPs)在临床试验中患者的招募、教育和护理方面发挥着重要作用。然而,关于APPs在早期(I至II期)临床试验中管理不良事件(AEs)的作用,仍有许多未知之处。在本研究中,我们评估了APPs在早期试验中对3至4级AE的门诊管理情况,并描述了我们的APP I至II期快速通道(FT)诊所的工作流程。
我们回顾性分析了2017年9月至2018年8月在研究性癌症治疗科的APP I至II期FT诊所接受诊治的、参加I至II期临床试验的晚期或转移性实体瘤患者的记录。
10名APPs共对159项临床试验中的808名患者进行了2697次诊疗(每位患者平均3次诊疗;范围为1至28次)。6.9%的诊疗中治疗被中断,5.4%的诊疗中出现了3至4级AE;然而,1.4%的诊疗中的患者被送往急诊中心(EC)和/或住院。被送往EC和/或住院的患者更有可能出现基线低白蛋白血症、高乳酸脱氢酶以及东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)表现状态较差(即ECOG>1;P< .001)。EC转诊与性别、APP的工作年限或治疗类型之间无关联。
APP I至II期FT诊所在门诊环境下的早期临床试验中,APPs管理AE方面发挥着重要作用,有可能避免患者前往EC就诊和住院。