Monitoring practices of chronic lung allograft dysfunction in pediatric lung transplantation.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) continues to negatively impact the survival of pediatric lung transplant (LTx) recipients. Current consensus guidelines are adult-focused. We sought to examine CLAD detection and monitoring practices at pediatric LTx programs.

METHODS

We conducted a survey among the International Pediatric Lung Transplant Collaborative. Questions consisted of practitioner's experience, LTx program demographics, and querying tests used for CLAD surveillance and detection. Investigations queried included: chest x-ray (CXR), chest computed tomography (CT), lung magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ventilation/perfusion scanning, conventional pulmonary function testing (PFT), multiple breath washout (MBW), infant/preschool PFT, bronchoalveolar lavage, transbronchial biopsies (TBBx), or other tissue sampling techniques. Preferences for certain modalities over others were questioned based on a five-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of 25 programs responded. Chest CT and CXR are used generally for both CLAD surveillance and detection. No programs use lung MRI clinically, it may have some utility in the future. While all centers use conventional PFT, MBW, and infant/preschool PFT are used in one-fifth and one-third of centers, respectively. While the majority of programs use TBBx, only 41.7% would obtain a diagnosis based on tissue histopathology over noninvasive techniques if CLAD is suspected. Utilization of biomarkers is still limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate continued use of conventional PFT along with chest CT and less so CXR for CLAD detection and monitoring in the large majority of centers. Infant/preschool PFT and novel methods such as MBW are used in a few centers only. Respondents agreed there is a timely need for pediatric consensus guidelines on CLAD detection and monitoring.