• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖皮质激素毒性指数在天疱疮中的适用性:利妥昔单抗治疗组与利妥昔单抗未治疗组患者的比较。

Applicability of glucocorticoid toxicity index in pemphigus: Comparison between two groups of rituximab-treated and rituximab-naïve patients.

机构信息

Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Dermatol Ther. 2022 Dec;35(12):e15902. doi: 10.1111/dth.15902. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1111/dth.15902
PMID:36200713
Abstract

Rituximab (RTX) combined with short-term glucocorticoids (GC) is an effective therapeutic option for pemphigus. The newly developed Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) tool provides the possibility to measure GC toxicities over time. To compare 1-year GTI between two groups of RTX-treated and RTX-naïve patients with pemphigus. The responsiveness of the GTI was also investigated. A prospective cohort of 129 adults with newly diagnosed pemphigus was conducted. GC-related toxicities were assessed at 3-month intervals according to Composite and Specific lists of the GTI. Of the patients, 76.7% (n = 99) received RTX. Throughout the time intervals, RTX-treated patients had lower GTI compared to RTX-naïve ones (p = 0.036). The mean GTI at 1-year was 34.3 in the RTX-treated group and 50.8 in the RTX-naïve group (p = 0.04). The most commonly observed GC-related toxicity was neuropsychiatric manifestations for 34% (224 events). The relapse rate of RTX-treated patients (1%) was significantly lower than RTX-naïve patients (10%) (p = 0.037). The GTI showed no correlation with cumulative GC consumption in both groups (p > 0.05, both). Patients treated with GC alone had remarkably higher GTI than patients treated with GC plus RTX. The GTI is an applicable tool to quantitatively capture GC toxicities at the patient level in pemphigus.

摘要

利妥昔单抗(RTX)联合短期糖皮质激素(GC)是治疗天疱疮的有效治疗选择。新开发的糖皮质激素毒性指数(GTI)工具提供了随时间测量 GC 毒性的可能性。比较两组接受 RTX 治疗和 RTX 初治的天疱疮患者的 1 年 GTI。还研究了 GTI 的反应性。对 129 名新诊断为天疱疮的成年人进行了前瞻性队列研究。根据 GTI 的综合和具体清单,每 3 个月评估一次 GC 相关毒性。其中,76.7%(n=99)的患者接受了 RTX 治疗。在整个时间间隔内,与 RTX 初治患者相比,RTX 治疗患者的 GTI 较低(p=0.036)。RTX 治疗组的平均 GTI 为 1 年 34.3,RTX 初治组为 50.8(p=0.04)。最常见的 GC 相关毒性是神经精神表现,占 34%(224 例事件)。RTX 治疗患者(1%)的复发率明显低于 RTX 初治患者(10%)(p=0.037)。GTI 与两组患者的累积 GC 消耗均无相关性(p>0.05,均)。单独使用 GC 治疗的患者的 GTI 明显高于 GC 加 RTX 联合治疗的患者。GTI 是一种适用于定量捕捉天疱疮患者 GC 毒性的工具。

相似文献

1
Applicability of glucocorticoid toxicity index in pemphigus: Comparison between two groups of rituximab-treated and rituximab-naïve patients.糖皮质激素毒性指数在天疱疮中的适用性:利妥昔单抗治疗组与利妥昔单抗未治疗组患者的比较。
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Dec;35(12):e15902. doi: 10.1111/dth.15902. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
2
Comparing early and late treatments with rituximab in pemphigus vulgaris: which one is better?比较天疱疮的早期和晚期利妥昔单抗治疗:哪一个更好?
Arch Dermatol Res. 2019 Jan;311(1):63-69. doi: 10.1007/s00403-018-1881-1. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
3
Efficacy of rituximab for pemphigus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of different regimens.利妥昔单抗治疗天疱疮的疗效:不同方案的系统评价和荟萃分析
Acta Derm Venereol. 2015 Nov;95(8):928-32. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2116.
4
Rituximab in practice: Clinical evaluation of patients with pemphigus after rituximab administration.利妥昔单抗治疗寻常型天疱疮和落叶型天疱疮的临床疗效评价。
Dermatol Ther. 2021 Jan;34(1):e14633. doi: 10.1111/dth.14633. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
5
Efficacy and safety of biosimilar rituximab in patients with pemphigus vulgaris: a prospective observational study.生物类似药利妥昔单抗治疗寻常型天疱疮患者的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2021 Feb;32(1):33-40. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1617831. Epub 2019 May 28.
6
Multiple cycles of rituximab therapy for pemphigus: A group of patients with difficult- to-treat disease or a consequence of late rituximab initiation?利妥昔单抗治疗天疱疮的多个周期:是一组难治性疾病患者,还是利妥昔单抗起始延迟的结果?
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Feb;35(2):e15249. doi: 10.1111/dth.15249. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
7
A prospective study comparing patients with early and late relapsing pemphigus treated with rituximab.一项比较利妥昔单抗治疗早期和晚期复发天疱疮患者的前瞻性研究。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jul;79(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.01.029. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Glucocorticoid Therapy in ANCA Vasculitis: Using the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index as an Outcome Measure.在抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体血管炎中使用糖皮质激素治疗:使用糖皮质激素毒性指数作为结局指标。
Kidney360. 2021 Apr 20;2(6):1002-1010. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000502021. eCollection 2021 Jun 24.
9
Adverse electrocardiographic effects of rituximab infusion in pemphigus patients.利妥昔单抗输注对天疱疮患者的心电图不良影响。
Dermatol Ther. 2020 Nov;33(6):e14299. doi: 10.1111/dth.14299. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
10
Prospective assessment of glucocorticoid toxicity in rheumatology practice: a focus on the glucocorticoid toxicity index.风湿病实践中糖皮质激素毒性的前瞻性评估:聚焦糖皮质激素毒性指数
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Mar 1;64(3):1010-1018. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae288.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective assessment of glucocorticoid toxicity in rheumatology practice: a focus on the glucocorticoid toxicity index.风湿病实践中糖皮质激素毒性的前瞻性评估:聚焦糖皮质激素毒性指数
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Mar 1;64(3):1010-1018. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae288.
2
Focus on pemphigus treatment publications: A bibliometric and visual analysis (1992-2022).关注天疱疮治疗相关出版物:文献计量与可视化分析(1992 - 2022年)
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 20;10(7):e28462. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28462. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
3
Drug Adherence and its Association with Health Literacy Among Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Diseases.
自身免疫性大疱性疾病患者的药物依从性及其与健康素养的关联
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2023 Apr;16(4):38-42.