• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的冠状动脉轨道旋切术

Coronary Orbital Atherectomy in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

作者信息

Donatelle Marissa, Agasthi Pradyumna, Parise Helen, Igyarto Zsuzsanna, Martinsen Brad J, Leon Martin B, Beohar Nirat

机构信息

Mount Sinai Medical Center, 4300 Alton Rd, Miami Beach, FL 33140 USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Oct;34(10):E696-E700. doi: 10.25270/jic/22.00066.

DOI:10.25270/jic/22.00066
PMID:36200995
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Orbital atherectomy (OA) has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with severe calcific coronary artery disease; however, there is a paucity of data on OA use in patients with concomitant severe aortic stenosis (AS).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing coronary OA treatment of severely calcified lesions, from January 2014 to September 2020 at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida (MSMCMB), was completed. Data were analyzed to assess rates of angiographic complications, successful stent placement, and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemic cerebrovascular accident [CVA], and hemorrhagic CVA) in AS vs non-AS patients.

RESULTS

A total of 609 patients underwent OA; of those, 32 (5.3%) had severe AS. The AS patient cohort was significantly older (80.3 years vs 73.7 years; P<.001), with a significantly higher percentage of Hispanic or Latino individuals (75% vs 56.5%; P=.04) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (64.6 mL/min/1.73 m² vs 76.6 mL/min/1.73 m²; P =.03) than the non-AS cohort. Angiographic complication rates were similar and both groups resulted in 100% successful stent placement. There was no difference in MACE rates between the AS and non-AS cohorts (3.1% vs 1.4%; P=.39).

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the largest real-world comparison of OA use in AS vs non-AS patients. OA appears feasible, safe, and effective prior to stent placement in patients with severe AS. Prospective randomized trials are needed to determine the ideal revascularization strategy for AS patients.

摘要

目的

轨道旋磨术(OA)已被证明在严重钙化冠状动脉疾病患者中是安全有效的;然而,关于OA在合并严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者中的应用数据较少。

方法

对2014年1月至2020年9月在佛罗里达州迈阿密海滩西奈山医疗中心(MSMCMB)接受冠状动脉OA治疗严重钙化病变的连续患者进行回顾性分析。分析数据以评估AS患者与非AS患者的血管造影并发症发生率、支架成功置入率和院内主要不良心血管事件(MACE;定义为心源性死亡、心肌梗死、缺血性脑血管意外[CVA]和出血性CVA的复合事件)发生率。

结果

共有609例患者接受了OA治疗;其中32例(5.3%)患有严重AS。AS患者队列年龄显著更大(80.3岁对73.7岁;P<0.001),西班牙裔或拉丁裔个体比例显著更高(75%对56.5%;P = 0.04),估计肾小球滤过率更低(64.6 mL/min/1.73 m²对76.6 mL/min/1.73 m²;P = 0.03),高于非AS队列。血管造影并发症发生率相似,两组均实现了100%的支架成功置入。AS队列和非AS队列的MACE发生率无差异(3.1%对1.4%;P = 0.39)。

结论

本研究是AS患者与非AS患者使用OA的最大规模真实世界比较。OA在严重AS患者支架置入前似乎是可行、安全且有效的。需要进行前瞻性随机试验以确定AS患者的理想血运重建策略。

相似文献

1
Coronary Orbital Atherectomy in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的冠状动脉轨道旋切术
J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Oct;34(10):E696-E700. doi: 10.25270/jic/22.00066.
2
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Complex Calcific Coronary Lesions Utilizing Orbital Atherectomy Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经皮冠状动脉介入术治疗复杂钙化冠状动脉病变,在经导管主动脉瓣置换术之前使用轨道旋磨术。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Apr;37:82-85. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.06.117. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
3
Orbital Atherectomy for Calcific Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Safety and Feasibility Study.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者钙化性冠状动脉疾病的眼眶旋磨术:一项安全性和可行性研究。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Jul;31(7):E205-E210.
4
Coronary orbital atherectomy treatment of Hispanic and Latino patients: A real-world comparative analysis.经冠状轨道旋磨术治疗西班牙裔和拉丁裔患者:一项真实世界的对比分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 May;99(6):1752-1757. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30158. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
5
Orbital atherectomy safety and efficacy: A comparative analysis of ostial versus non-ostial calcified coronary lesions.球囊血管成形术的安全性和有效性:对比分析开口处与非开口处钙化冠状动脉病变。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Jan;58:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.07.013. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
6
Orbital atherectomy treatment of severely calcified native coronary lesions in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting: Acute and one-year outcomes from the ORBIT II trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者严重钙化的自身冠状动脉病变的旋磨治疗:ORBIT II试验的急性和一年期结果
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jul;19(5 Pt A):498-502. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
7
Intravascular imaging-guided treatment of severe coronary artery calcification with orbital atherectomy: A prospective single-centre registry.血管内成像引导下使用冠状动脉旋磨术治疗严重冠状动脉钙化:一项前瞻性单中心注册研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2023 Jan;78(1):7-13.
8
Initial Experience With GlideAssist to Facilitate Advancement of Orbital Atherectomy Prior to Plaque Modification of Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Lesions.在严重钙化冠状动脉病变斑块修饰之前,使用GlideAssist辅助推进冠状动脉旋磨术的初步经验。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Nov;31(11):331-334.
9
Outcomes of Orbital Atherectomy in Severely Calcified Small (2.5 mm) Coronary Artery Vessels.严重钙化的小(2.5毫米)冠状动脉血管的旋磨术结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Aug;30(8):310-314.
10
Impact of Impaired Renal Function in Patients With Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions Treated With Orbital Atherectomy.肾功能受损对接受冠状动脉旋磨术治疗的严重钙化冠状动脉病变患者的影响。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 Jun;29(6):203-206. Epub 2017 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗钙化和难治性病变
EuroIntervention. 2025 Apr 7;21(7):e339-e355. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195.