Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Pharm Pract. 2024 Apr;37(2):301-306. doi: 10.1177/08971900221132120. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
Patients with hematologic malignancies frequently develop febrile neutropenia (FN) and subsequently receive long courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Limited data is available on de-escalation strategies. : This was a retrospective observational cohort study of adult patients with a hematologic malignancy, FN, and positive culture results from June 2017 to June 2020. A conventional group (patients who remained on empiric, broad-spectrum agents) was compared to a de-escalation group (patients whose antibiotic therapy was de-escalated based on culture results). The primary outcome was the incidence of recurrent fever or antibiotic escalation due to infection while neutropenic. Of the 123 patients included, the composite primary outcome occurred in 35.3% in the de-escalation group and 39.3% in the conventional group ( = .83). For secondary outcomes, median time to recurrent fever was 7 days in the de-escalation group and 7 days in the conventional group ( = .73). Incidence of was 5.9% in the de-escalation group and 6.7% in the conventional group ( = 1.00). Development of multidrug resistant pathogens during hospital admission was 20.6% in the de-escalation group and 14.6% in the conventional group ( = .59). Median length of broad-spectrum antibiotics was 3 days in the de-escalation group and 8 days in the conventional group ( < .001). All-cause mortality within 30 days was 0 in the de-escalation group and 5.6% in the conventional group ( = .32). In a small sample of patients with a hematologic malignancy and FN, de-escalating antibiotics based on positive cultures decreased the duration of antibiotic therapy without increasing the rate of antibiotic failure.
血液病患者常发生发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN),随后接受长期广谱抗生素治疗。关于降阶梯策略的数据有限。:这是一项回顾性观察性队列研究,纳入了 2017 年 6 月至 2020 年 6 月期间患有血液恶性肿瘤、FN 和阳性培养结果的成年患者。常规组(继续使用经验性广谱药物的患者)与降阶梯组(根据培养结果降级抗生素治疗的患者)进行比较。主要结局是中性粒细胞减少症期间因感染而再次发热或抗生素升级的发生率。在纳入的 123 例患者中,降阶梯组和常规组的复合主要结局发生率分别为 35.3%和 39.3%( =.83)。次要结局方面,降阶梯组再次发热的中位时间为 7 天,常规组为 7 天( =.73)。的发生率分别为降阶梯组 5.9%和常规组 6.7%( = 1.00)。降阶梯组和常规组在住院期间发生多重耐药病原体的比例分别为 20.6%和 14.6%( =.59)。降阶梯组广谱抗生素的中位使用时间为 3 天,常规组为 8 天( <.001)。降阶梯组和常规组 30 天内全因死亡率分别为 0 和 5.6%( =.32)。在一小部分患有血液恶性肿瘤和 FN 的患者中,根据阳性培养结果降级抗生素可减少抗生素治疗的持续时间,而不会增加抗生素治疗失败的风险。