• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植受者晚期抗体介导排斥反应治疗中血浆置换方法的比较

A comparison of methods of plasmapheresis for the treatment of late antibody mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

作者信息

Caliskan Yasar, Mirioglu Safak, Dirim Ahmet Burak, Ozluk Yasemin, Yegit Ozan, Aksoy Elif, Safak Seda, Guller Nurana, Demir Erol, Artan Ayse Serra, Oto Ozgur Akin, Besisik Sevgi, Yazici Halil, Turkmen Aydin, Lentine Krista L

机构信息

Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.

Division of Nephrology, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Ther Apher Dial. 2023 Jun;27(3):428-434. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.13937. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1111/1744-9987.13937
PMID:36201223
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We compared the outcomes associated with plasma exchange (PE), double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), or immunoadsorption (IA) in the treatment of late antibody mediated rejection (AMR).

METHODS

Sixty-nine kidney transplantation (KTx) recipients with late AMR were retrospectively categorized according to management with PE (n = 30), DFPP (n = 22) or IA (n = 17). Allograft loss was compared across treatment groups by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Study groups were similar regarding age, sex, donor type, kidney function, donor specific antibodies, and post-KTx follow-up time. Five-year graft survival trended higher with IA (70.6%) compared to PE (36.7%) and DFPP (27.3%) (p = 0.06). In multivariate Cox regression, baseline eGFR (HR per ml/min/1.73 m [95% CI]; 0.96 [0.94-0.99]), rituximab use (HR [95% CI]; 0.42 [0.21-0.84]), interstitial inflammation (i) (HR [95% CI]; 2.05 [1.13-3.69]), and transplant glomerulopathy (cg) (HR [95% CI]; 1.46 [1.13-1.87]) were associated with graft loss.

CONCLUSION

These results motivate the need for continued assessment of rituximab and plasmapheresis in larger studies.

摘要

引言

我们比较了血浆置换(PE)、双重滤过血浆置换(DFPP)或免疫吸附(IA)治疗晚期抗体介导排斥反应(AMR)的疗效。

方法

69例晚期AMR肾移植(KTx)受者根据治疗方法回顾性分为PE组(n = 30)、DFPP组(n = 22)或IA组(n = 17)。通过Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox回归比较各治疗组的移植物丢失情况。

结果

研究组在年龄、性别、供体类型、肾功能、供体特异性抗体和肾移植后随访时间方面相似。与PE组(36.7%)和DFPP组(27.3%)相比,IA组的5年移植物存活率更高(70.6%)(p = 0.06)。在多变量Cox回归分析中,基线估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR,每毫升/分钟/1.73平方米的风险比[95%置信区间];0.96 [0.94 - 0.99])、使用利妥昔单抗(风险比[95%置信区间];0.42 [0.21 - 0.84])、间质炎症(i)(风险比[95%置信区间];2.05 [1.13 - 3.69])和移植性肾小球病(cg)(风险比[95%置信区间];1.46 [1.13 - 1.87])与移植物丢失相关。

结论

这些结果表明需要在更大规模的研究中继续评估利妥昔单抗和血浆置换疗法。

相似文献

1
A comparison of methods of plasmapheresis for the treatment of late antibody mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients.肾移植受者晚期抗体介导排斥反应治疗中血浆置换方法的比较
Ther Apher Dial. 2023 Jun;27(3):428-434. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.13937. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
2
Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection with double-filtration plasmapheresis, low dose IVIg plus rituximab after kidney transplantation.肾移植后采用双重滤过血浆置换、小剂量 IVIg 联合利妥昔单抗治疗抗体介导的排斥反应。
J Clin Apher. 2021 Aug;36(4):584-594. doi: 10.1002/jca.21897. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
3
Subclinical Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: Treatment Outcomes.移植肾后亚临床抗体介导的排斥反应:治疗结局。
Transplantation. 2019 Aug;103(8):1722-1729. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002566.
4
Durable renal response after combination of bortezomib, corticosteroids, rituximab, and plasmapheresis for late antibody-mediated renal transplant rejection
.硼替佐米、皮质类固醇、利妥昔单抗和血浆置换联合治疗晚期抗体介导的肾移植排斥反应后的持久肾脏反应
Clin Nephrol. 2018 Apr;89(4):252-259. doi: 10.5414/CN109278.
5
Treatment of Biopsy-Proven Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection Using Thymoglobulin (ATG) Monotherapy and a Combination of Rituximab, Intravenous Immunoglobulin, and Plasmapheresis: Lesson Learned from Primary Experience.使用抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)单药治疗以及利妥昔单抗、静脉注射免疫球蛋白和血浆置换联合治疗活检证实的急性抗体介导排斥反应:从初步经验中获得的教训
Clin Transpl. 2014:223-30.
6
Successful use of nonantigen-specific immunoadsorption with antihuman Ig-columns in kidney graft antibody-mediated rejection.成功应用抗人免疫球蛋白柱的非抗原特异性免疫吸附治疗肾移植抗体介导的排斥反应。
J Clin Apher. 2020 Jun;35(3):188-199. doi: 10.1002/jca.21779. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
7
Failure to remove de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies is influenced by antibody properties and identifies kidney recipients with late antibody-mediated rejection destined to graft loss - a retrospective study.未能清除新产生的供体特异性 HLA 抗体受抗体特性的影响,并可识别出发生晚期抗体介导排斥反应导致移植物丢失的肾移植受者——一项回顾性研究。
Transpl Int. 2019 Jan;32(1):38-48. doi: 10.1111/tri.13325. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
8
Successful A1-to-O ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation after a preconditioning regimen consisting of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody infusions, splenectomy, and double-filtration plasmapheresis.在接受由抗CD20单克隆抗体输注、脾切除术和双重滤过血浆置换组成的预处理方案后,成功进行了A1至O血型不相容的肾移植。
Transplantation. 2002 Nov 15;74(9):1207-10. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200211150-00001.
9
Efficacy of Double Membrane Filtration Immunoadsorption in Severe C1q-Binding Donor-Specific Antibody-Positive Acute Humoral Kidney Allograft Rejection: A Case Series.双重膜滤过免疫吸附治疗补体 C1q 结合型供者特异性抗体阳性的急性体液性肾移植排斥反应的疗效:一项病例系列研究。
Blood Purif. 2023;52(5):428-436. doi: 10.1159/000528748. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
10
Combined posttransplant prophylactic IVIg/anti-CD 20/plasmapheresis in kidney recipients with preformed donor-specific antibodies: a pilot study.移植后联合预防性 IVIg/抗 CD20/血浆置换治疗预存供体特异性抗体的肾移植受者:一项初步研究。
Transplantation. 2010 Jun 15;89(11):1403-10. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181da1cc3.

引用本文的文献

1
Case Report: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia following double filtration plasmapheresis in a patient with anti-GAD65 autoimmune encephalitis.病例报告:一名抗GAD65自身免疫性脑炎患者在双重过滤血浆置换后发生肝素诱导的血小板减少症。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 10;12:1574698. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1574698. eCollection 2025.
2
Current Therapies in Kidney Transplant Rejection.肾移植排斥反应的当前治疗方法
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 27;12(15):4927. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154927.