Salomão Marcella Q, Hofling-Lima Ana Luisa, Gomes Esporcatte Louise Pellegrino, Correa Fernando Faria, Meneses Erica Ferreira, Li Yan, Huang David, Lopes Bernardo, Sena Nelson, Machado Aydano P, Ambrósio Renato
From the Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Salomão, Gomes Esporcatte, Meneses, Lopes, Sena Jr, Ambrósio Jr); Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Salomão, Gomes Esporcatte, Meneses, Lopes, Sena Jr, Machado, Ambrósio Jr); BrAIN: Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Networking in Medicine, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil (Salomão, Machado, Ambrósio Jr); Department of Ophthalmology, Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo-São Paulo, Brazil (Salomão, Hofling-Lima, Gomes Esporcatte, Lopes, Machado, Ambrósio Jr); Instituto Benjamin Constant, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Salomão); Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal (Correa); School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal (Correa); Casey Eye Institute, and Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon (Li, Huang); the Brass Eye Center (Brass), Latham, New York (Li, Huang); the Gordon Weiss Schanzlin Vision Institute (Weiss), San Diego, California (Li, Huang); School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom (Lopes); Computing Institute, Federal University of Alagoas. Maceió, Brazil (Machado); Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the state of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) (Sena Jr, Ambrósio Jr).
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Feb 1;49(2):190-194. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001066.
To test the ability of the corneal epithelial pattern standard deviation (PSD) to distinguish between normal and cases with corneal ectatic condition.
Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cross-sectional retrospective study.
Patients were stratified into 4 groups based on clinical data and corneal tomography. Groups 1 and 2 comprised 1 eye randomly selected from 105 patients with normal corneas (N) and 86 patients with bilateral keratoconus (KC). Groups 3 and 4, respectively, comprised 11 ectatic eyes with no surgical treatment for KC (very asymmetric ectasia [VAE]-E) from patients whose fellow eyes (61) presented with normal topographic patterns (VAE-NT). Corneas were scanned using an OCT system (RT Vue) and Scheimpflug corneal tomography (Pentacam) and also had biomechanical assessment through the Corvis ST. Corneal epithelial thickness maps were analyzed, and the PSD value was calculated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the indices.
A total of 105 normal eyes, 86 keratoconic eyes, and 11 ectatic eyes whose fellow eyes (61) presented normal topographic patterns were evaluated. Epithelial PSD was significantly different across the 4 groups ( P < .0001). The pairwise comparison revealed that the normal group presented significantly lower values than both ectasia groups (KC and VAE-E, P < .0001) and the VAE-NT group ( P = .0008). There was no statistical significant difference between KC and VAE-E ( P = .4284), while they were significantly higher than the VAE-NT group ( P < .0001 and P = .0004).
Epithelial PSD can be used to detect abnormal epithelial thickness patterns. Corneal epithelial thickness changes could be detected accurately in patients with KC, even in the form fruste of the disease.
测试角膜上皮模式标准差(PSD)区分正常人和角膜扩张性疾病患者的能力。
巴西里约热内卢雷纳托·安布罗西奥眼科研究所。
横断面回顾性研究。
根据临床数据和角膜地形图将患者分为4组。第1组和第2组分别从105例正常角膜(N)患者和86例双侧圆锥角膜(KC)患者中随机选取1只眼。第3组和第4组分别包括11只未经KC手术治疗的扩张性眼(非常不对称扩张[VAE]-E),其对侧眼(61只)地形图模式正常(VAE-NT)。使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)系统(RT Vue)和Scheimpflug角膜地形图仪(Pentacam)对角膜进行扫描,并通过Corvis ST进行生物力学评估。分析角膜上皮厚度图并计算PSD值。采用受试者操作特征曲线分析下的面积评估指标的诊断准确性。
共评估了105只正常眼、86只圆锥角膜眼和11只对侧眼(61只)地形图模式正常的扩张性眼。4组之间上皮PSD有显著差异(P <.0001)。两两比较显示,正常组的值显著低于扩张组(KC和VAE-E,P <.0001)和VAE-NT组(P =.0008)。KC组和VAE-E组之间无统计学显著差异(P =.4284),但它们显著高于VAE-NT组(P <.0001和P =.0004)。
上皮PSD可用于检测异常上皮厚度模式。即使在圆锥角膜疾病的顿挫型中,也能准确检测到KC患者角膜上皮厚度的变化。