Suppr超能文献

角膜上皮像差:圆锥角膜和亚临床圆锥角膜的一种新型诊断工具。

Corneal epithelial aberrations: a novel diagnostic tool for keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus.

作者信息

Ning Rui, Lei Chak Seng, Yang Xinning, Li Yue, Yang Yizhou, Gustafsson Ingemar, Savini Giacomo, Schiano-Lomoriello Domenico, Zhou Xingtao, Wang Xiaoying, Huang Jinhai

机构信息

Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Eye Vis (Lond). 2025 Aug 6;12(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40662-025-00449-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the ability of corneal epithelial aberrations to discriminate forme fruste keratoconus (FFKC) and keratoconus (KC) from normal eyes.

METHODS

This prospective, case-control study enrolled 91 right eyes from 91 normal participants, 87 eyes with FFKC and 148 eyes with KC. Epithelial aberrations for the 6-mm pupil were measured using an anterior segment optical coherence tomography (MS-39, CSO). The epithelial root mean square of higher and lower-order aberrations (total RMS), root mean square of higher-order aberrations (HOAs RMS, from the 3rd to the 7th Zernike polynomials), coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, and secondary astigmatism were recorded. Stepwise logistic regression was utilized to develop the epithelial aberrations index (EAI) for obtaining the optimal discriminant function to diagnose FFKC (EAI-FFKC) and KC (EAI-KC). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the indices.

RESULTS

FFKC and KC eyes had significantly higher epithelial aberrations than normal eyes. Comparing FFKC with the normal group, epithelial HOAs RMS and coma attained AUC values of 0.714 and 0.788, respectively. The EAI-FFKC showed the highest discrimination ability to differentiate FFKC from normal eyes indicated by an AUC value of 0.822 with 77.0% sensitivity and 75.8% specificity. Comparing KC with the normal group, epithelial HOAs RMS attained AUC values of 0.976-0.998 with 95.2%-100% sensitivity and 92.3%-96.7% specificity, epithelial coma attained AUC values of 0.974-0.997 with 92.9%-100% sensitivity and 96.7%-98.9% specificity. The EAI-KC showed the highest discriminative ability to differentiate KC from normal eyes indicated by AUC of 0.996 with 98.6% sensitivity and 98.9% specificity.

CONCLUSION

Epithelial wavefront analysis can identify abnormal epithelial changes across all stages of KC, from very early to severe. Epithelial aberrations can be used as a diagnostic tool for KC and FFKC.

摘要

目的

评估角膜上皮像差区分亚临床圆锥角膜(FFKC)和圆锥角膜(KC)与正常眼的能力。

方法

这项前瞻性病例对照研究纳入了91名正常参与者的91只右眼、87只患有FFKC的眼睛和148只患有KC的眼睛。使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描仪(MS - 39,CSO)测量6毫米瞳孔的上皮像差。记录高阶和低阶像差的上皮均方根(总均方根)、高阶像差的均方根(HOAs RMS,从第3到第7个泽尼克多项式)、彗差、三叶草像差、球差和继发性散光。采用逐步逻辑回归来建立上皮像差指数(EAI),以获得诊断FFKC(EAI - FFKC)和KC(EAI - KC)最佳判别函数。使用受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积分析来确定这些指数的诊断准确性。

结果

FFKC和KC眼的上皮像差显著高于正常眼。将FFKC与正常组比较,上皮HOAs RMS和彗差的AUC值分别为0.714和0.788。EAI - FFKC显示出区分FFKC与正常眼的最高判别能力,AUC值为0.822,敏感性为77.0%,特异性为75.8%。将KC与正常组比较,上皮HOAs RMS的AUC值为0.976 - 0.998,敏感性为95.2% - 100%,特异性为92.3% - 96.7%;上皮彗差的AUC值为0.974 - 0.997,敏感性为92.9% - 100%,特异性为96.7% - 98.9%。EAI - KC显示出区分KC与正常眼的最高判别能力,AUC为0.996,敏感性为98.6%,特异性为98.9%。

结论

上皮波前分析可以识别KC从极早期到严重期所有阶段的异常上皮变化。上皮像差可作为KC和FFKC诊断工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3c/12326862/ab9ad3035079/40662_2025_449_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Corneal epithelial aberrations: a novel diagnostic tool for keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus.
Eye Vis (Lond). 2025 Aug 6;12(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40662-025-00449-x.
2
Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes.
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;38(4):1565-1573. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0620-5. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
3
A Novel Optical Coherence Tomography-based Keratoconus Diagnostic Index Incorporating Stromal and Epithelial Features.
J Refract Surg. 2025 Aug;41(8):e748-e759. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250602-02. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
4
Non-corneal Intraocular Higher Order Aberrations in Eyes With Keratoconus Versus Normal Myopic Eyes.
J Refract Surg. 2025 Mar;41(3):e189-e198. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250103-02. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
5
6
Artificial intelligence for detecting keratoconus.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 15;11(11):CD014911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014911.pub2.
7
Corneal epithelium is altered in keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07663-6.
9
Comparison of the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal corneas.
Semin Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 17;36(8):671-678. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1896752. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
10
Prediction of the small aperture intraocular lens on visual acuity in patients with keratoconus.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Sep 1;50(9):930-935. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001480.

本文引用的文献

1
Corneal higher-order aberrations in different types of irregular cornea.
J Optom. 2024 Oct-Dec;17(4):100522. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2024.100522. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
3
Corneal higher order aberrations by Sirius topography and their relation to different refractive errors.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 16;23(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02841-4.
4
Corneal ectasia detection by epithelial pattern standard deviation from OCT.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Feb 1;49(2):190-194. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001066.
5
Best indices of dual Scheimpflug/Placido tomographer for keratoconus detection.
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr;43(4):1353-1362. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02533-w. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
6
Repeatability and Comparison of Corneal Tomography in Mild to Severe Keratoconus Between the Anterior Segment OCT MS-39 and Pentacam HR.
J Refract Surg. 2022 Apr;38(4):250-255. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220114-02. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
7
Characteristics of Higher-Order Aberrations in Different Stages of Keratoconus.
Eye Contact Lens. 2022 Jun 1;48(6):256-260. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000897. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
8
Evaluation of corneal topography, pachymetry and higher order aberrations for detecting subclinical keratoconus.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 May;42(3):594-608. doi: 10.1111/opo.12956. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
9
Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Feb;75(1):25-36. doi: 10.4097/kja.21209. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
10
Keratoconus: An updated review.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2022 Jun;45(3):101559. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.101559. Epub 2022 Jan 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验