• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前臂远 1/4 段是超声引导下桡动脉置管的最佳插入部位:一项随机对照试验。

The distal quarter of the forearm is the optimal insertion site for ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Istanbul Basaksehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Basaksehir, Istanbul, Turkey.

Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Bahar mh, Karabaglar, İzmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2024 Mar;25(2):538-545. doi: 10.1177/11297298221126284. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1177/11297298221126284
PMID:36203357
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend the use of ultrasound guidance for arterial cannulation. However, there are no recommendations on the best insertion site for radial artery cannulation in terms of catheter dwell time and incidence of complications.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled study 94 patients were randomly assigned into three groups, corresponding to three different sites of insertion for radial artery cannulation: hand wrist: (Site/group 1,  = 29), distal quarter part of the forearm (Site/group 2,  = 30) and the midpoint of the forearm (Site/group 3,  = 35). Age, height, weight, and diagnosis of each patient were recorded prior to insertions which were performed by a single investigator experienced in ultrasound-guided vascular access.

RESULTS

Radial artery diameters were similar (2.4 ± 0.4 vs 2.5 ± 0.3 vs 2.6 ± 0.4 mm), however skin to vessel distances were different between groups, and the depth of the radial artery increased progressively from distal to proximal sites. There was a significant difference between groups in terms of success rates at the first attempt. Only two cannulations were successful at first attempt, and overall, only 17 of 35 cannulations were successful at Site 1. Arterial cannula dislodgement rate was highest at Site 1(8/29, 26.7%), while the longest dwell time was at Site 2 with a median of 4 (IQR 3) days.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the high removal rate at the wrist region and the high failure rate at the midpoint of the forearm, the distal quarter of the forearm can be identified as "the optimal insertion site' for ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation.

摘要

背景

目前的指南建议在动脉置管时使用超声引导。然而,在导管留置时间和并发症发生率方面,对于桡动脉置管的最佳插入部位,尚无相关推荐。

方法

在这项随机对照研究中,94 名患者被随机分为三组,对应桡动脉置管的三个不同插入部位:手腕(部位/组 1,=29)、前臂远端四分之一部分(部位/组 2,=30)和前臂中点(部位/组 3,=35)。在插入之前,记录了每位患者的年龄、身高、体重和诊断情况,这些插入操作均由一位经验丰富的超声引导血管通路专家进行。

结果

桡动脉直径相似(2.4±0.4 毫米 vs 2.5±0.3 毫米 vs 2.6±0.4 毫米),但组间皮肤至血管距离不同,桡动脉深度从远端到近端逐渐增加。在首次尝试成功率方面,组间存在显著差异。仅有两次尝试在第一次就成功了,而在总体上,只有 35 次置管中的 17 次在部位 1 成功。部位 1 的动脉插管脱落率最高(8/29,26.7%),而部位 2 的留置时间最长,中位数为 4(IQR 3)天。

结论

考虑到手部区域的高移除率和前臂中点的高失败率,前臂远端四分之一部分可被确定为超声引导桡动脉置管的“最佳插入部位”。

相似文献

1
The distal quarter of the forearm is the optimal insertion site for ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial.前臂远 1/4 段是超声引导下桡动脉置管的最佳插入部位:一项随机对照试验。
J Vasc Access. 2024 Mar;25(2):538-545. doi: 10.1177/11297298221126284. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
2
Comparison of ultrasound guided dorsal radial artery cannulation and conventional radial artery cannulation at the volar aspect of wrist: A pilot randomized controlled trial.超声引导下腕背桡动脉置管与传统腕掌侧桡动脉置管的比较:一项初步随机对照试验。
J Vasc Access. 2023 Nov;24(6):1463-1468. doi: 10.1177/11297298221093953. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
3
Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization at different sites: a prospective and randomized study.超声引导下不同部位桡动脉置管:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Jan;26(2):415-421. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202201_27865.
4
Forty-five degree wrist angulation is optimal for ultrasound guided long axis radial artery cannulation in patients over 60 years old: a randomized study.60岁以上患者超声引导下桡动脉长轴穿刺时,45度腕关节成角为最佳角度:一项随机研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2014 Dec;28(6):567-72. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9552-z. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
5
Comparison of Single-operator Laser-assisted Ultrasound-guided Radial Arterial Cannulation in Young Children with Traditional Ultrasound Guidance: A Randomized Clinical Trial.单操作员激光辅助超声引导桡动脉置管术与传统超声引导在小儿中的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Anesthesiology. 2023 May 1;138(5):497-507. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004534.
6
Median nerve block increases the success rate of radial artery cannulation in women with gestational hypertension undergoing cesarean section.正中神经阻滞增加了妊娠高血压产妇行剖宫产术时桡动脉置管的成功率。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 5;22(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01793-4.
7
Scale ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in infant: A randomized controlled trial.超声引导下桡动脉置管术在婴儿中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
J Vasc Access. 2023 Mar;24(2):205-212. doi: 10.1177/11297298211024053. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
8
A novel electromagnetic guidance ultrasound system on radial artery cannulation: a prospective randomized controlled trial.新型电磁引导超声系统在桡动脉置管中的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01244-6.
9
Comparison of short-axis out-of-plane versus long-axis in-plane ultrasound-guided radial arterial cannulation in adult patients: a randomized controlled trial.成年患者短轴平面外与长轴平面内超声引导桡动脉置管的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Anesth. 2017 Feb;31(1):89-94. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2270-6. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
10
Modified short-axis out-of-plane ultrasound versus conventional long-axis in-plane ultrasound to guide radial artery cannulation: a randomized controlled trial.改良短轴平面外超声与传统长轴平面内超声引导桡动脉置管的随机对照试验
Anesth Analg. 2014 Jul;119(1):163-169. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000242.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound-guided radial vein cannulation for general anesthesia in cases with difficult peripheral venous access: a report of two cases.超声引导下经桡静脉置管用于外周静脉穿刺困难患者的全身麻醉:2例报告
JA Clin Rep. 2024 Sep 19;10(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40981-024-00743-y.
2
Insertion Site Dilemma: Rethinking Radial Arterial Catheter Placement for Device Resilience.穿刺部位困境:重新思考桡动脉置管以提高设备耐用性。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Jan 16;6(1):e1037. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001037. eCollection 2024 Jan.