Ko Emily R, Anstrom Kevin J, Panettieri Reynold A, Lachiewicz Anne M, Maillo Martin, O'Halloran Jane A, Boucher Cynthia, Smith P Brian, McCarthy Matthew W, Segura Nunez Patricia, Mendivil Tuchia de Tai Sabina, Khan Akram, Mena Lora Alfredo J, Salathe Matthias, Kedar Eyal, Capo Gerardo, Rodríguez Gonzalez Daniel, Patterson Thomas F, Palma Christopher, Ariza Horacio, Patelli Lima Maria, Blamoun John, Nannini Esteban C, Sprinz Eduardo, Mykietiuk Analia, Wang Jennifer P, Parra-Rodriguez Luis, Der Tatyana, Willsey Kate, Benjamin Daniel K, Wen Jun, Zakroysky Pearl, Halabi Susan, Silverstein Adam, McNulty Steven E, O'Brien Sean M, Al-Khalidi Hussein R, Butler Sandra, Atkinson Jane, Adam Stacey J, Chang Soju, Maldonado Michael A, Proscham Michael, LaVange Lisa, Bozzette Samuel A, Powderly William G
medRxiv. 2022 Sep 26:2022.09.22.22280247. doi: 10.1101/2022.09.22.22280247.
We investigated whether abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, provides additional benefit when added to standard-of-care for patients hospitalized with Covid-19.
We conducted a master protocol to investigate immunomodulators for potential benefit treating patients hospitalized with Covid-19 and report results for abatacept. Intravenous abatacept (one-time dose 10 mg/kg, maximum dose 1000 mg) plus standard of care (SOC) was compared with shared placebo plus SOC. Primary outcome was time-to-recovery by day 28. Key secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality.
Between October 16, 2020 and December 31, 2021, a total of 1019 participants received study treatment (509 abatacept; 510 shared placebo), constituting the modified intention-to-treat cohort. Participants had a mean age 54.8 (SD 14.6) years, 60.5% were male, 44.2% Hispanic/Latino and 13.7% Black. No statistically significant difference for the primary endpoint of time-to-recovery was found with a recovery-rate-ratio of 1.14 (95% CI 1.00-1.29; p=0.057) compared with placebo. We observed a substantial improvement in 28-day all-cause mortality with abatacept versus placebo (11.0% vs. 15.1%; odds ratio [OR] 0.62 [95% CI 0.41- 0.94]), leading to 38% lower odds of dying. Improvement in mortality occurred for participants requiring oxygen/noninvasive ventilation at randomization. Subgroup analysis identified the strongest effect in those with baseline C-reactive protein >75mg/L. We found no statistically significant differences in adverse events, with safety composite index slightly favoring abatacept. Rates of secondary infections were similar (16.1% for abatacept; 14.3% for placebo).
Addition of single-dose intravenous abatacept to standard-of-care demonstrated no statistically significant change in time-to-recovery, but improved 28-day mortality.
ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04593940 ).
我们研究了选择性共刺激调节剂阿巴西普在添加到新冠肺炎住院患者的标准治疗方案中时是否能带来额外益处。
我们开展了一项主方案研究,以调查免疫调节剂对新冠肺炎住院患者的潜在治疗益处,并报告阿巴西普的研究结果。将静脉注射阿巴西普(单次剂量10mg/kg,最大剂量1000mg)加标准治疗(SOC)与共享安慰剂加SOC进行比较。主要结局是第28天的康复时间。关键次要终点包括28天死亡率。
在2020年10月16日至2021年12月31日期间,共有1019名参与者接受了研究治疗(509名接受阿巴西普治疗;510名接受共享安慰剂治疗),构成了改良意向性治疗队列。参与者的平均年龄为54.8(标准差14.6)岁,60.5%为男性,44.2%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,13.7%为黑人。与安慰剂相比,主要终点康复时间的恢复率比值为1.14(95%置信区间1.00-1.29;p=0.057),未发现统计学显著差异。我们观察到,与安慰剂相比,阿巴西普治疗组的28天全因死亡率有显著改善(11.0%对15.1%;比值比[OR]0.62[95%置信区间0.41-0.94]),死亡几率降低了38%。随机分组时需要吸氧/无创通气的参与者死亡率有所改善。亚组分析发现,基线C反应蛋白>75mg/L的参与者效果最为明显。我们发现不良事件无统计学显著差异,安全性综合指数略倾向于阿巴西普。二次感染率相似(阿巴西普组为16.1%;安慰剂组为14.3%)。
在标准治疗方案中添加单剂量静脉注射阿巴西普,康复时间无统计学显著变化,但28天死亡率有所改善。
ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04593940)