Suppr超能文献

用于小儿癫痫的非氨酯——我们是否应继续将其作为最后手段使用?

Felbamate for pediatric epilepsy-should we keep on using it as the last resort?

作者信息

Rabinowicz Shira, Schreiber Tal, Heimer Gali, Bar-Yosef Omer, Nissenkorn Andreea, E Zohar-Dayan, Arkush Leo, Hamed Nasrin, Ben-Zeev Bruria, Tzadok Michal

机构信息

Pediatric Neurology Unit, Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 20;13:979725. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.979725. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Concerns regarding felbamate adverse effects restrict its widespread use in children with drug-resistant epilepsy. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of felbamate in those children and identify the ones who may benefit most from its use.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical files of all patients who were treated with felbamate in a tertiary pediatric epilepsy clinic between 2009-2021. Drug efficacy was determined at the first 3 months of treatment and thereafter. Therapeutic response and adverse reactions were monitored throughout the course of treatment.

RESULTS

Our study included 75 children (age 8.9 ± 3.7 years), of whom 53 were treated with felbamate for seizures, 16 for electrical status epilepticus during sleep and 6 for both. The median follow-up time was 16 months (range 1-129 months). The most common cause for epilepsy was genetic (29%). The median number of previous anti-seizure medications was six [4-8]. A therapeutic response ≥50% was documented in 37 (51%) patients, and a complete response in 9 (12%). Nineteen patients (25%) sustained adverse reactions, including three cases of elevated liver enzymes and one case of neutropenia with normal bone marrow aspiration. In all cases, treatment could be continued. All children with intractable epilepsy following herpes encephalitis showed a response to felbamate.

CONCLUSION

Felbamate is an efficacious and safe anti-seizure medication in the pediatric population.

摘要

引言

对非氨酯不良反应的担忧限制了其在耐药性癫痫儿童中的广泛应用。我们旨在研究非氨酯在这些儿童中的疗效和安全性,并确定可能从其使用中获益最大的儿童。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2009年至2021年在一家三级儿科癫痫诊所接受非氨酯治疗的所有患者的病历。在治疗的前3个月及之后确定药物疗效。在整个治疗过程中监测治疗反应和不良反应。

结果

我们的研究纳入了75名儿童(年龄8.9±3.7岁),其中53名因癫痫发作接受非氨酯治疗,16名因睡眠中癫痫性电持续状态接受治疗,6名两者皆有。中位随访时间为16个月(范围1至129个月)。癫痫最常见的病因是遗传因素(29%)。既往抗癫痫药物的中位数为六种[4-8]。37名(51%)患者记录到治疗反应≥50%,9名(12%)患者完全缓解。19名患者(25%)出现不良反应,包括3例肝酶升高和1例骨髓穿刺正常的中性粒细胞减少症。所有病例均可继续治疗。所有疱疹性脑炎后难治性癫痫儿童对非氨酯均有反应。

结论

非氨酯在儿科人群中是一种有效且安全的抗癫痫药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bdb/9530252/4d9b4e60e008/fneur-13-979725-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验