Zhao Yunli, Guyatt Gordon, Gao Ya, Hao Qiukui, Abdullah Ream, Basmaji John, Foroutan Farid
The Centre of Gerontology and Geriatrics (National Clinical Research Centre for Geriatrics), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Sep 29;54:101677. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101677. eCollection 2022 Dec.
The non-causal and causal associations, possible age and sex differences between living alone and all-cause mortality among adults were unclear. We aimed to assess the association and causal relation between living alone and all-cause mortality among community-dwelling adults, addressing the certainty of evidence, possible age and sex differences.
We searched Medline, Embase, and APA PsycINFO for cohort studies examining the association between living alone and all-cause mortality on November 19, 2021. We used the GRADE approach to assess certainty of evidence, and the Instrument for the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) to evaluate credibility of subgroup inferences and conducted a meta-analysis of measures of association between living alone and mortality. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021290895.
18 cohort studies with 62,174 adults proved eligible. Living alone was associated with mortality (relative risk (RR) = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.23). Both age and sex modified the association (high and moderate credibility, separately). Living alone increased the risk of dying only in younger but not older individuals (ratio of RRs = 1.59, interaction = 0.003; younger RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.17-1.71, high certainty for prognosis, low for causation; older RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.22, moderate certainty for prognosis, very low for causation). Living alone increased risk to a greater extent in males than females (ratio of RRs = 1.39, 95% CI 1.14-1.70; interaction = 0.001, males RR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.17-1.71, high certainty for prognosis, low for causation; females RR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.99-1.33; moderate for prognosis factor, very low for causation).
Living alone is associated with increased mortality in individuals under 65 years (high certainty) but not with those over 75 years; the association may be causal (low certainty). Associations, and possibly effects, may be stronger in men than women.
None.
独居与成年人全因死亡率之间的非因果关联和因果关联、可能存在的年龄和性别差异尚不清楚。我们旨在评估社区居住成年人中独居与全因死亡率之间的关联和因果关系,探讨证据的确定性、可能的年龄和性别差异。
2021年11月19日,我们在Medline、Embase和APA PsycINFO中检索了关于独居与全因死亡率之间关联的队列研究。我们采用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性,并使用效应修饰分析可信度工具(ICEMAN)评估亚组推断的可信度,同时对独居与死亡率之间的关联指标进行了荟萃分析。该研究已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42021290895。
18项涉及62174名成年人的队列研究符合纳入标准。独居与死亡率相关(相对风险(RR)=1.15,95%置信区间(CI)1.08-1.23)。年龄和性别均对该关联产生修饰作用(分别为高可信度和中等可信度)。独居仅增加了年轻个体而非老年个体的死亡风险(RR比值=1.59,交互作用=0.003;年轻个体RR=1.41,95%CI 1.17-1.71,预后确定性高,因果关系确定性低;老年个体RR=1.05,95%CI 0.91-1.22,预后确定性中等,因果关系确定性极低)。独居使男性死亡风险增加的程度大于女性(RR比值=1.39,95%CI 1.14-1.70;交互作用=0.001,男性RR=1.41,95%CI 1.17-1.71,预后确定性高,因果关系确定性低;女性RR=1.15,95%CI 0.99-1.33;预后因素为中等可信度,因果关系为极低可信度)。
独居与65岁以下个体死亡率增加相关(高确定性),但与75岁以上个体无关;这种关联可能是因果性的(低确定性)。男性的关联以及可能的影响可能比女性更强。
无。