Turner Benedict R H, Machin Matthew, Jasionowska Sara, Salim Safa, Onida Sarah, Shalhoub Joseph, Davies Alun H
Academic Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):166-171. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005709. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after endovenous interventions for varicose veins in the presence of pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis versus mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone.
The VTE rate after endovenous procedures for varicose veins is higher than other day-case procedures and could be reduced with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.
The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines with a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42021274963). Studies of endovenous intervention for superficial venous incompetence reporting the predefined outcomes with at least 30 patients were eligible. Data were pooled with a fixed effects model.
There were 221 trials included in the review (47 randomized trial arms, 105 prospective cohort studies, and 69 retrospective studies). In randomized trial arms, the rate of deep venous thrombosis with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.52% (95% CI, 0.23%-1.19%) (9 studies, 1095 patients, 2 events) versus 2.26% (95% CI, 1.81%-2.82%) (38 studies, 6951 patients, 69 events) with mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone. The rate of pulmonary embolism in randomized trial arms with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.45% (95% CI, 0.09-2.35) (5 studies, 460 participants, 1 event) versus 0.23% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.52%) (28 studies, 4834 participants, 3 events) for mechanical measures alone. The rate of EHIT grade III to IV was 0.35% (95% CI, 0.09-1.40) versus 0.88% (95% CI, 0.28%-2.70%). There was 1 VTE-related mortality and 1 instance of major bleeding, with low rates of minor bleeding.
There is a significant reduction in the rate of DVT with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and routine prescription of anticoagulation after endovenous varicose vein intervention should be considered. VTE risk for individual study participants is heterogeneous and risk stratification in future randomized interventional studies is critical to establish the clinical effectiveness and safety of additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的主要目的是阐明在采用药物和机械性血栓预防措施与仅采用机械性血栓预防措施的情况下,静脉曲张腔内治疗后静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的发生率。
静脉曲张腔内治疗后的VTE发生率高于其他日间手术,药物性血栓预防措施可降低该发生率。
本评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,并采用已注册的方案(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库:CRD42021274963)。纳入报道了预设结局且至少有30例患者的浅静脉功能不全腔内治疗研究。采用固定效应模型汇总数据。
本评价纳入了221项试验(47个随机试验组、105项前瞻性队列研究和69项回顾性研究)。在随机试验组中,采用额外药物性血栓预防措施时深静脉血栓形成率为0.52%(95%CI,0.23%-1.19%)(9项研究,1095例患者,2例事件),而仅采用机械性血栓预防措施时为2.26%(95%CI,1.81%-2.82%)(38项研究,6951例患者,69例事件)。采用额外药物性血栓预防措施的随机试验组中肺栓塞率为0.45%(95%CI,0.09-2.35)(5项研究,460名参与者,1例事件),而仅采用机械性措施时为0.23%(95%CI,0.1%-0.52%)(28项研究,4834名参与者,3例事件)。EHIT III至IV级发生率为0.35%(95%CI,0.09-1.40),而仅采用机械性措施时为0.88%(95%CI,0.28%-2.70%)。有1例VTE相关死亡和1例大出血事件,小出血发生率较低。
额外采用药物性血栓预防措施可显著降低深静脉血栓形成率,应考虑在静脉曲张腔内治疗后常规开具抗凝药物处方。各研究参与者的VTE风险存在异质性,未来随机干预研究中的风险分层对于确定额外药物性血栓预防措施的临床有效性和安全性至关重要。