Suppr超能文献

与产前无法识别的胎儿生长受限相关的特征:DESiGN 随机对照试验中的嵌套前瞻性队列研究。

Characteristics associated with antenatally unidentified small-for-gestational-age fetuses: prospective cohort study nested within DESiGN randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;61(3):356-366. doi: 10.1002/uog.26091.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the clinical characteristics and patterns of ultrasound use amongst pregnancies with an antenatally unidentified small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetus, compared with those in which SGA is identified, to understand how to design interventions that improve antenatal SGA identification.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of singleton, non-anomalous SGA (birth weight < 10 centile) neonates born after 24 + 0 gestational weeks at 13 UK sites, recruited for the baseline period and control arm of the DESiGN trial. Pregnancy with antenatally unidentified SGA was defined if there was no scan or if the final scan showed estimated fetal weight (EFW) at the 10 centile or above. Identified SGA was defined if EFW was below the 10 centile at the last scan. Maternal and fetal sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were studied for associations with unidentified SGA using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models. Ultrasound parameters (gestational age at first growth scan, number and frequency of ultrasound scans) were described, stratified by presence of indication for serial ultrasound. Associations of unidentified SGA with absolute centile and percentage weight difference between the last scan and birth were also studied on unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression, according to time between the last scan and birth.

RESULTS

Of the 15 784 SGA babies included, SGA was not identified antenatally in 78.7% of cases. Of pregnancies with unidentified SGA, 47.1% had no recorded growth scan. Amongst 9410 pregnancies with complete data on key maternal comorbidities and antenatal complications, the risk of unidentified SGA was lower for women with any indication for serial scans (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.56 (95% CI, 0.49-0.64)), for Asian compared with white women (aOR, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69-0.93)) and for those with non-cephalic presentation at birth (aOR, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.46-0.73)). The risk of unidentified SGA was highest among women with a body mass index (BMI) of 25.0-29.9 kg/m (aOR, 1.15 (95% CI, 1.01-1.32)) and lowest in those with underweight BMI (aOR, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48-0.76)) compared to women with BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m . Compared to women with identified SGA, those with unidentified SGA had fetuses of higher SGA birth-weight centile (adjusted odds for unidentified SGA increased by 1.21 (95% CI, 1.18-1.23) per one-centile increase between the 0 and 10 centiles). Duration between the last scan and birth increased with advancing gestation in pregnancies with unidentified SGA. SGA babies born within a week of the last growth scan had a mean difference between EFW and birth-weight centiles of 19.5 (SD, 13.8) centiles for the unidentified-SGA group and 0.2 (SD, 3.3) centiles for the identified-SGA group (adjusted mean difference between groups, 19.0 (95% CI, 17.8-20.1) centiles).

CONCLUSIONS

Unidentified SGA was more common amongst women without an indication for serial ultrasound, and in those with cephalic presentation at birth, BMI of 25.0-29.9 kg/m and less severe SGA. Ultrasound EFW was overestimated in women with unidentified SGA. This demonstrates the importance of improving the accuracy of SGA screening strategies in low-risk populations and continuing performance of ultrasound scans for term pregnancies. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

目的

比较产前无法识别的小胎龄儿(SGA)与产前已识别的 SGA 妊娠的临床特征和超声应用模式,以了解如何设计改善产前 SGA 识别的干预措施。

方法

这是一项在英国 13 个地点进行的前瞻性队列研究,纳入了在 24 周+0 孕周后出生的、非畸形的、SGA(出生体重<第 10 百分位数)新生儿,这些新生儿被招募用于 DESiGN 试验的基线期和对照组。如果没有扫描或最后一次扫描显示估计胎儿体重(EFW)在第 10 百分位数或以上,则定义为产前无法识别的 SGA。如果最后一次扫描的 EFW 低于第 10 百分位数,则定义为已识别的 SGA。使用未调整和调整后的逻辑回归模型,研究了母亲和胎儿的社会人口统计学和临床特征与无法识别的 SGA 之间的关系。根据最后一次扫描和出生之间的时间,还研究了无法识别的 SGA 与最后一次扫描和出生之间的绝对百分位和体重差异百分比之间的关联,这些关联在未调整和调整后的逻辑回归中进行了分析。

结果

在纳入的 15784 例 SGA 婴儿中,78.7%的 SGA 在产前无法识别。在无法识别的 SGA 妊娠中,47.1%没有记录生长扫描。在有 9410 例关键产妇合并症和产前并发症完整数据的妊娠中,有连续超声检查指征的女性发生无法识别的 SGA 的风险较低(调整后的优势比(aOR),0.56(95%CI,0.49-0.64)),与白人相比,亚洲女性发生无法识别的 SGA 的风险较低(aOR,0.80(95%CI,0.69-0.93)),与出生时非头位的女性相比,发生无法识别的 SGA 的风险较低(aOR,0.58(95%CI,0.46-0.73))。BMI 为 25.0-29.9 kg/m 2 的女性发生无法识别的 SGA 的风险最高(aOR,1.15(95%CI,1.01-1.32)),BMI 为消瘦的女性发生无法识别的 SGA 的风险最低(aOR,0.61(95%CI,0.48-0.76)),与 BMI 为 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 的女性相比。与已识别的 SGA 相比,无法识别的 SGA 的胎儿出生时 SGA 体重百分位较高(无法识别的 SGA 的调整优势比每增加一个百分位,在 0-10 百分位之间增加 1.21(95%CI,1.18-1.23))。在无法识别的 SGA 妊娠中,最后一次扫描和出生之间的时间间隔随胎龄的增加而延长。在最后一次生长扫描后一周内分娩的 SGA 婴儿,EFW 和出生体重百分位之间的平均差异为 19.5(标准差,13.8)个百分位,而在已识别的 SGA 组中为 0.2(标准差,3.3)个百分位(两组之间的调整平均差异,19.0(95%CI,17.8-20.1)个百分位)。

结论

在没有连续超声检查指征的女性中,以及在头位分娩、BMI 为 25.0-29.9 kg/m 2 和 SGA 程度较轻的女性中,无法识别的 SGA 更为常见。在无法识别的 SGA 女性中,超声 EFW 被高估。这表明,在低风险人群中,需要改进 SGA 筛查策略的准确性,并继续对足月妊娠进行超声检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfa4/7616055/9f40b6a5bb4d/EMS196131-f001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验