College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Hydrological Cycle and Sponge City Technology, Beijing 100875, China; Engineering Research Center of Groundwater Pollution Control and Remediation of Ministry of Education, Beijing 100875, China.
Higher Institute of Finance and Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 20;857(Pt 1):159216. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159216. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
Due to its independent control and directly easy operation, ecological water replenishment (EWR) has been an important measure for restoring river ecosystems. However, the positive and negative contribution of the EWR activities to aquifer system are not fully understood under the combined influences of climate change and human activities across time scales. A refined groundwater flow model integrating an open channel flow at daily time scales is developed in a part of Northern China Plain to reproduce the dynamic process of groundwater level changes. After model calibration with groundwater level and runoff data, the changes of simulated groundwater level and river runoff have the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient of 0.98 and 0.60, respectively. Results clearly demonstrate that the impulse response of aquifer recovery to runoff in three centralized EWRs. By using with and without EWR method, the simulated maximum contribution of EWR near river to aquifer recovery may be over 70 %. Scenario analysis method considering different precipitation, groundwater exploitation reduction and EWR activities are applied to evaluate the total quantities of aquifer recovery. The prediction of nine-year EWR activities under multiple scenarios shows that the increased groundwater level generally varies from 4.08 to 8.57 m, and the contribution of EWR accounts for 7.88 %-36.59 %. It is also noticed that 14 out of the 18 informal landfill sites will face potential groundwater pollution risks, indicating the negative influences of long-term EWR activities. This study can provide a method for quantifying the influences and contribution of EWR on aquifer recovery and can be referred to as a guideline for EWR evaluation with similar hydrogeological conditions.
由于其独立控制和直接易于操作,生态补水(EWR)已成为恢复河流生态系统的重要措施。然而,在气候变化和人类活动的综合影响下,从时间尺度上看,EWR 活动对含水层系统的积极和消极贡献尚未完全了解。本研究在华北平原的一部分地区开发了一个集成了每日时间尺度上的明渠流的地下水流动模型,以再现地下水位变化的动态过程。在利用地下水位和径流水文数据进行模型校准后,模拟地下水位和河流径流量的变化具有纳什-苏特克里夫效率系数分别为 0.98 和 0.60。结果清楚地表明,含水层恢复对三次集中 EWR 径流的脉冲响应。通过使用有和无 EWR 的方法,模拟 EWR 对含水层恢复的最大贡献可能超过 70%。考虑不同降水、地下水开采减少和 EWR 活动的情景分析方法,用于评估含水层恢复的总水量。在多个情景下预测九年的 EWR 活动表明,地下水位的增加通常在 4.08 到 8.57 米之间,EWR 的贡献占 7.88%-36.59%。还注意到,18 个非正式垃圾填埋场中有 14 个将面临潜在的地下水污染风险,这表明了长期 EWR 活动的负面影响。本研究可以提供一种量化 EWR 对含水层恢复的影响和贡献的方法,并可以作为类似水文地质条件下 EWR 评价的指南。