• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[不可逆电穿孔与传统切除术治疗局部晚期胰腺癌的疗效比较]

[Comparison of the efficacy of irreversible electroporation and conversional resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer].

作者信息

He C B, Wang J, Mao Y Z, Lao X M, Li S P

机构信息

Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine,Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,Guangzhou 510060,China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 1;60(10):948-954. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220415-00168.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220415-00168
PMID:36207984
Abstract

To compare the short-term and long-term prognosis of irreversible electroporation(IRE) and conversional resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer(LAPC). The clinical and pathological data of 98 LAPC patients who underwent IRE or conversional resection at the Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery,Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from August 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected and analyzed.The study comprised of 53 males and 45 females, with age((IQR)) of 57.5(13.5)years old(range:20 to 87 years old). Fifty-three patients received IRE treatment(IRE group) and 45 patients received surgical resection(resection group). The differences of clinical and pathological data between both groups were not significant(all <0.05). The Mann-Whitney test was used for quantitative data and the χ test was used for categorical data.Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using Log-rank test. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were 5.0(2.4)hours and 50(100) ml in the IRE group,respectively,which were significantly less than those of resection group(7.0(3.3)hours and 400(200)ml,both <0.05).The hospital stay and hospitalization cost were 9.0(3.0)days and 79 154 (83 738) yuan in the IRE group,respectively,which were also significantly less than those in the resection group(16.0(8.5)days and 109 557(37 795)yuan,both <0.05).The complication rate of IRE group was significantly lower than that of the resection group(18.8% 55.6%,χ=14.270,<0.01).The median overall survival(OS) time of IRE group was 28.9 months(95%:23.2 to 34.6 months),with the 1-,2-,and 3-year OS rates of 91.6%,61.7%,and 24.6%,respectively.The median survival of OS of resection group was 27.1 months(95%:20.9 to 33.3 months),with the 1-,2-,and 3-year OS rates of 81.8%,53.9%,and 30.3%,respectively.There was no significant difference in OS between the two groups(χ=0.900,=0.760).The median progression free survival(PFS) time of IRE group was 18.0 months(95%:14.7 to 21.3 months),with the 1-,2-,and 3-year PFS rates of 68.3%,29.7%,and 9.9%,respectively.The median survival of PFS of resection group was 11.1 months(95%:6.1 to 16.2 months),with the 1-,2-,and 3-year PFS rates of 45.2%,21.9%,and 14.6%,respectively.There was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups(χ=1.850,=0.170). IRE can achieve similar survival for LAPC and may has less complications compared to those with conversion resection.

摘要

比较不可逆电穿孔(IRE)与传统切除术治疗局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)的短期和长期预后。回顾性收集并分析了2015年8月至2020年12月在中山大学肿瘤防治中心胰胆外科接受IRE或传统切除术的98例LAPC患者的临床和病理资料。该研究包括53例男性和45例女性,年龄(四分位间距)为57.5(13.5)岁(范围:20至87岁)。53例患者接受IRE治疗(IRE组),45例患者接受手术切除(切除组)。两组临床和病理资料差异无统计学意义(均P<0.05)。定量资料采用Mann-Whitney检验,分类资料采用χ²检验。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析生存率,Log-rank检验进行比较。IRE组手术时间和术中出血量分别为5.0(2.4)小时和50(100)ml,明显少于切除组(7.0(3.3)小时和400(200)ml,均P<0.05)。IRE组住院时间和住院费用分别为9.0(3.0)天和79 154(83 738)元,也明显少于切除组(16.0(8.5)天和109 557(37 795)元,均P<0.05)。IRE组并发症发生率明显低于切除组(18.8%比55.6%,χ²=14.270,P<0.01)。IRE组中位总生存(OS)时间为28.9个月(95%CI:23.2至34.6个月),1年、2年和3年OS率分别为91.6%、61.7%和24.6%。切除组OS中位生存时间为27.1个月(95%CI:20.9至33.3个月),1年、2年和3年OS率分别为81.8%、53.9%和30.3%。两组OS差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.900,P=0.760)。IRE组中位无进展生存(PFS)时间为18.0个月(95%CI:14.7至21.3个月),1年、2年和3年PFS率分别为6

相似文献

1
[Comparison of the efficacy of irreversible electroporation and conversional resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer].[不可逆电穿孔与传统切除术治疗局部晚期胰腺癌的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 1;60(10):948-954. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220415-00168.
2
[Combining intraoperative ultrasound-guided irreversible electroporation with chemotherapy for treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a clinical report of 64 cases].术中超声引导下不可逆电穿孔联合化疗治疗局部进展期胰腺癌:64例临床报告
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 1;58(10):787-792. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200331-00270.
3
Survival Comparison of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Irreversible Electroporation Versus Conversional Resection for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.新辅助化疗后行不可逆电穿孔与转化性切除治疗局部进展期胰腺癌的生存比较
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 2;10:622318. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.622318. eCollection 2020.
4
Irreversible electroporation versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a propensity score analysis.诱导化疗后不可逆电穿孔与放疗对局部晚期胰腺癌患者生存的影响:倾向评分分析。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Apr 27;19(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5607-3.
5
Comparison of combination therapies in the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Induction chemotherapy followed by irreversible electroporation vs radiofrequency ablation.局部进展期胰腺癌的联合治疗比较:诱导化疗后行不可逆电穿孔与射频消融术。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(13):4699-4710. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3119. Epub 2020 May 15.
6
Irreversible electroporation to bring initially unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma to surgery: the IRECAP phase II study.不可逆电穿孔使初始无法切除的局部进展期胰腺腺癌可手术切除:IRECAP Ⅱ期研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6885-6895. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10613-x. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
7
Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced and Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer (PANFIRE-2): A Multicenter, Prospective, Single-Arm, Phase II Study.经皮不可逆电穿孔治疗局部晚期和复发性胰腺癌(PANFIRE-2):一项多中心、前瞻性、单臂、二期研究。
Radiology. 2020 Jan;294(1):212-220. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191109. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
8
Irreversible electroporation after induction chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.诱导化疗后不可逆电穿孔与单纯化疗治疗局部晚期胰腺癌患者的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Pancreatology. 2020 Apr;20(3):477-484. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
9
Percutaneous irreversible electroporation combined with allogeneic natural killer cell immunotherapy for patients with unresectable (stage III/IV) pancreatic cancer: a promising treatment.经皮不可逆电穿孔联合异基因自然杀伤细胞免疫疗法治疗不可切除(III/IV期)胰腺癌患者:一种有前景的治疗方法。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;143(12):2607-2618. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2513-4. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
10
Initial experience of irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer in a Korean population.韩国人群中局部进展期胰腺癌不可逆电穿孔治疗的初步经验。
Acta Radiol. 2021 Feb;62(2):164-171. doi: 10.1177/0284185120917118. Epub 2020 Apr 15.