• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于神经网络注意力的人类阅读中任务效应建模。

Modeling task effects in human reading with neural network-based attention.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States; Collaborative Research Center 1102, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.

School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105289. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105289. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105289
PMID:36208565
Abstract

Research on human reading has long documented that reading behavior shows task-specific effects, but it has been challenging to build general models predicting what reading behavior humans will show in a given task. We introduce NEAT, a computational model of the allocation of attention in human reading, based on the hypothesis that human reading optimizes a tradeoff between economy of attention and success at a task. Our model is implemented using contemporary neural network modeling techniques, and makes explicit and testable predictions about how the allocation of attention varies across different tasks. We test this in an eyetracking study comparing two versions of a reading comprehension task, finding that our model successfully accounts for reading behavior across the tasks. Our work thus provides evidence that task effects can be modeled as optimal adaptation to task demands.

摘要

人类阅读研究长期以来已经证明,阅读行为表现出特定任务的效果,但构建能够预测人类在给定任务中表现出何种阅读行为的通用模型一直具有挑战性。我们引入了 NEAT,这是一种人类阅读中注意力分配的计算模型,基于这样一种假设,即人类阅读在注意力经济性和任务成功之间进行权衡优化。我们的模型使用当代神经网络建模技术实现,并对注意力分配如何在不同任务中变化做出明确和可测试的预测。我们在一项眼动研究中对两个阅读理解任务版本进行了测试,发现我们的模型成功地解释了两个任务中的阅读行为。因此,我们的工作提供了证据,表明任务效应可以建模为对任务需求的最佳适应。

相似文献

1
Modeling task effects in human reading with neural network-based attention.基于神经网络注意力的人类阅读中任务效应建模。
Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105289. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105289. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
2
Human attention during goal-directed reading comprehension relies on task optimization.在目标导向的阅读理解中,人类注意力依赖于任务优化。
Elife. 2023 Nov 30;12:RP87197. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87197.
3
Analysis of English Multitext Reading Comprehension Model Based on Deep Belief Neural Network.基于深度置信神经网络的英语多文本阅读理解模型分析。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Sep 15;2021:5100809. doi: 10.1155/2021/5100809. eCollection 2021.
4
The neural substrates associated with attentional resources and difficulty of concurrent processing of the two verbal tasks.与注意力资源和同时处理两个言语任务的难度相关的神经基质。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1998-2009. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.025. Epub 2012 May 6.
5
A functional connectivity-based neuromarker of sustained attention generalizes to predict recall in a reading task.基于功能连接的持续性注意力神经标志物可推广用于预测阅读任务中的回忆。
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 1;166:99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.019. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
6
The adaptive nature of eye movements in linguistic tasks: how payoff and architecture shape speed-accuracy trade-offs.语言任务中眼球运动的适应性:收益和结构如何塑造速度-准确性权衡。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;5(3):581-610. doi: 10.1111/tops.12032. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
7
Predicting the Reader's English Level From Reading Fixation Patterns Using the Siamese Convolutional Neural Network.使用孪生卷积神经网络从阅读注视模式预测读者的英语水平。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2022;30:1071-1080. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3157768. Epub 2022 May 2.
8
Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts.阅读简单和困难文本时的走神。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):586-92. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0367-y.
9
The Skilled, the Knowledgeable, and the Motivated: Investigating the Strategic Allocation of Time on Task in a Computer-Based Assessment.技术娴熟者、知识渊博者与积极主动者:探究基于计算机评估中任务时间的策略性分配
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 27;10:1429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01429. eCollection 2019.
10
Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.使用E-Z阅读器来模拟高级语言处理对阅读过程中眼动的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Feb;16(1):1-21. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Human attention during goal-directed reading comprehension relies on task optimization.在目标导向的阅读理解中,人类注意力依赖于任务优化。
Elife. 2023 Nov 30;12:RP87197. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87197.
2
Lexical Processing Strongly Affects Reading Times But Not Skipping During Natural Reading.词汇处理对自然阅读过程中的阅读时间有强烈影响,但对跳读没有影响。
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Oct 1;7:757-783. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00099. eCollection 2023.
3
Beyond the Benchmarks: Toward Human-Like Lexical Representations.超越基准:迈向类人词汇表征
Front Artif Intell. 2022 May 24;5:796741. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.796741. eCollection 2022.