Suppr超能文献

物质使用障碍治疗环境中的种族/民族差异:治疗保险的来源、社会经济相关性和临床特征。

Racial-ethnic disparities across substance use disorder treatment settings: Sources of treatment insurance, socioeconomic correlates and clinical features.

机构信息

College of Mount Saint Vincent, Riverdale, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2024 Oct-Dec;23(4):616-640. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2022.2129537. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

Abstract

Contrary to expectations, studies of racial-ethnic disparities in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment frequently uncover minority-majority parity in access and utilization of services. What accounts for the anomaly? To answer the question, this study explores racial-ethnic differences in the odds of utilization of SUD treatment in varied settings (e.g., the criminal justice system, private doctor's office, etc.), adjusting for sources of treatment insurance, socioeconomic correlates of treatment (e.g., employment, income, education), as well as clients' clinical features (e.g., type of substance abuse/dependence, co-morbidities, health status). Data were compiled from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) dataset, 2002-2014. The sample consisted of respondents with a past year diagnosis of a substance use disorder, who also reported having received treatment (n = 6,207). Data were pooled to maximize subgroup analyses. Weight- and design- adjusted logistic regressions were use to analyze factors predicting SUD treatment source. Blacks were more likely than Whites to receive treatment through the criminal justice system and Whites more likely than Blacks and Latinx to receive treatment at a doctor's office. Blacks were also more likely than Whites to receive treatment through inpatient/outpatient rehabilitation, before adjustments but not afterwards. In this study we show that even after adjusting for mechanisms expected to shape pathways from race-ethnicity to SUD treatment sites, significant racial-ethnic disparities persist. This fills an important gap in the literature in that disparities research has not explicitly modeled racial-ethnic variation across the full range of SUD treatment sites.

摘要

与预期相反,对物质使用障碍 (SUD) 治疗中种族-民族差异的研究经常发现,少数族裔与多数族裔在获得和利用服务方面相当。这是什么原因造成的异常?为了回答这个问题,本研究探讨了在不同环境中(例如刑事司法系统、私人医生办公室等)利用 SUD 治疗的可能性方面的种族-民族差异,同时调整了治疗保险的来源、与治疗相关的社会经济因素(例如就业、收入、教育)以及患者的临床特征(例如物质滥用/依赖的类型、合并症、健康状况)。数据来自 2002-2014 年全国药物使用和健康调查 (NSDUH) 数据集。样本包括过去一年被诊断患有物质使用障碍且报告接受过治疗的受访者(n=6207)。为了最大限度地进行亚组分析,对数据进行了汇总。使用加权和设计调整的逻辑回归分析来分析预测 SUD 治疗来源的因素。黑人比白人更有可能通过刑事司法系统接受治疗,而白人比黑人更有可能通过医生办公室接受治疗。黑人也比白人更有可能通过住院/门诊康复治疗,调整前如此,调整后也如此。在本研究中,我们表明,即使在调整了预期会影响从种族-民族到 SUD 治疗场所的途径的机制之后,仍然存在显著的种族-民族差异。这填补了文献中的一个重要空白,因为差异研究并未明确模拟 SUD 治疗场所的全范围的种族-民族差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验