Dermatology, Venereology, and Andrology, Faculty of Medicine Al-Azhar University, Damietta, Egypt.
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Dec;35(12):e15913. doi: 10.1111/dth.15913. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Alopecia areata (AA) is a disease that affects the psychological well-being of the affected individuals. Laser-assisted drug delivery and microneedling (MN) are promising methods for the treatment of different dermatological diseases. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of topical application of triamcinolone acetonide after fractional carbon dioxide laser versus MN in the treatment of resistant AA from a clinical and dermoscopic perspective. Thirty patients were randomly divided into two groups of 15 patients each: the Laser group received fractional CO laser treatment followed by topical application of triamcinolone acetonide, and the MN group received dermapen treatment followed by topical application of triamcinolone acetonide. In our study, we found no statistically significant difference between the studied groups before and after treatment, except for black dot, which is higher in the MN group than in the laser group (46.7% vs. 13.3%). There is a statistically significant difference between the studied groups in terms of treatment response at the first follow-up, with 13.3% of the laser group seeing terminal hair regrowth compared to 0 in the MN group after 12 weeks. Regarding the degree of improvement, there was no statistically significant difference between the laser group and the MN group. The use of fractional CO laser and MN for transepidermal drug delivery (TED) allowed for more uniform drug distribution. There was no significant difference between the two treatment methods in terms of their high effectiveness in the treatment of resistant AA.
斑秃(AA)是一种影响患者心理健康的疾病。激光辅助药物输送和微针(MN)是治疗不同皮肤病的有前途的方法。本研究的目的是从临床和皮肤镜的角度比较经皮二氧化碳激光与 MN 治疗耐药性 AA 的疗效。将 30 名患者随机分为两组,每组 15 名患者:激光组接受经皮二氧化碳激光治疗,然后局部应用曲安奈德,MN 组接受微针治疗,然后局部应用曲安奈德。在我们的研究中,我们发现治疗前后两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异,除了黑点,MN 组的黑点高于激光组(46.7%比 13.3%)。在第一次随访时,两组之间的治疗反应存在统计学上的显著差异,激光组有 13.3%的患者出现终毛再生,而 MN 组在 12 周后则没有。关于改善程度,激光组和 MN 组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。经皮二氧化碳激光和 MN 用于经皮药物输送(TED),可实现更均匀的药物分布。就治疗耐药性 AA 的高效性而言,两种治疗方法之间没有显著差异。