Peng Xiongjun, Zheng Yawen, Zhu Zhaowei, Liu Na, Zhou Shenghua, Long Junke
The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Department of Geriatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 23;9:922095. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.922095. eCollection 2022.
To explore the association of cardiac parameters with different clinical outcomes in patients with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy-induced myocardial injury.
We screened 3,848 patients who received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy from June 2018 to Oct 2021 at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Among those patients, 134 patients were diagnosed with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy-induced myocardial injury. Twenty-four patients with cardiovascular symptoms were divided into the major adverse cardiac events (MACE) group, and 110 patients without cardiovascular symptoms were divided into the non-MACE group. We compared creatine kinase isozyme (CK-MB), high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTNT), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP), electrocardiography (ECG), and echocardiographic parameters between the two groups of patients. CK-MB, hsTNT, NT-proBNP [2,600.0 (1,317.00-7,950.00) vs. 472.9 (280.40-788.80), ≤ 0.001], left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and QRS interval were significantly different. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the accuracy of various indicators to predict the occurrence of MACE events. NT-ProBNP (area under the curve [] 97.1) was the best predictor, followed by CK-MB ( = 94.1), LVEF ( = 83.4), LVEDd ( = 81.5), and other indicators. In the MACE group, 11/24 patients had experienced cardiogenic death by the end of follow-up. There were significant differences in the CK-MB, hsTNT, NT-proBNP, LVEDd, LVEF, and QRS intervals between the deceased patients and the survivors. The ROC curve shows that hsTNT is the most accurate marker for predicting cardiogenic death in the MACE group ( = 91.6).
In patients with myocardial injury after PD-1 inhibitor treatment, NT-proBNP is the parameter of choice to predict the likelihood of developing cardiovascular symptoms, whereas, in symptomatic patients, hsTNT is the optimal parameter associated with the outcome of death compared with other cardiac parameters.
探讨抗程序性死亡蛋白1(PD-1)免疫治疗所致心肌损伤患者心脏参数与不同临床结局的相关性。
我们筛选了2018年6月至2021年10月在中南大学湘雅二医院接受抗PD-1免疫治疗的3848例患者。其中,134例患者被诊断为抗PD-1免疫治疗所致心肌损伤。24例有心血管症状的患者被分为主要不良心脏事件(MACE)组,110例无心血管症状的患者被分为非MACE组。我们比较了两组患者的肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、高敏肌钙蛋白T(hsTNT)、N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-ProBNP)、心电图(ECG)和超声心动图参数。CK-MB、hsTNT、NT-proBNP[2600.0(1317.00 - 7950.00)对472.9(280.40 - 788.80),P≤0.001]、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDd)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)和QRS间期有显著差异。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较各项指标预测MACE事件发生的准确性。NT-ProBNP(曲线下面积[AUC]为97.1)是最佳预测指标,其次是CK-MB(AUC = 94.1)、LVEF(AUC = 83.4)、LVEDd(AUC = 81.5)和其他指标。在MACE组中,11/24例患者在随访结束时发生心源性死亡。死亡患者和存活患者在CK-MB、hsTNT、NT-proBNP、LVEDd、LVEF和QRS间期方面存在显著差异。ROC曲线显示,hsTNT是MACE组预测心源性死亡最准确的标志物(AUC = 91.6)。
在PD-1抑制剂治疗后发生心肌损伤的患者中,NT-proBNP是预测出现心血管症状可能性的首选参数,而在有症状的患者中,与其他心脏参数相比,hsTNT是与死亡结局相关的最佳参数。