Celis-Aguilar Erika, Mayoral-Flores Homero Oswaldo, Torrontegui-Zazueta Luis Alejandro, Medina-Cabrera Cindy Anahí, León-Leyva Ivonne Carolina, Dehesa-López Edgar
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Center of Research and Teaching in the Health Sciences (CIDOCS), Civil Hospital of Culiacan, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Eustaquio Buelna #91, 80030 Culiacan, Sinaloa Mexico.
Center of Research and Teaching in the Health Sciences (CIDOCS), Civil Hospital of Culiacan, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, 80030 Culiacan, Mexico.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Sep;74(3):314-321. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02516-w. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
The aim was to compare the effectiveness of Brandt-Daroff, Semont and Epley maneuver in BPPV resolution. A Single Blind RCT in a Secondary Care Center was performed. Inclusion criteria were: patients with unilateral rotatory nystagmus on Dix-Hallpike Maneuver (DHM). Exclusion criteria: other causes of peripheral or central vertigo. Patients were randomized into 4 groups: Brandt-Daroff, "sham", Semont and Epley. Patients underwent allocation, 1st visit (at 1 week with reprise of original maneuver if persistent nystagmus) and 2nd visit (2 to 4 weeks) with repetitions of both DHM and DHI. Main Outcome Measures: Absence of nystagmus on DHM at 1st and 2nd visit evaluations and DHI score. Resolution was defined as the abscence of nystagmus. We included 34 patients (25 females, 9 males). Patients were randomized to Brandt-Daroff (n = 9), "sham" (n = 7), Semont (n = 9) and Epley (n = 9) group. Overall mean age was 59.85 years (SD ± 13.10). A total of 47.06% patients (n = 16) had negative DHM at 1st visit. Resolution for Brandt-Daroff was 22.22%, "sham" 28.57%, Semont 44.44% and Epley 88.88% ( = 0.024); at 2nd visit follow up, Epley achieved 100% resolution (other maneuvers: 42.86%, 16.67%, 44.44%, respectively. = 0.006). The DHI improvement at 2nd visit for Brandt-Daroff was 21.17 points, "sham" 8.05, Semont 14.67 and Epley 61.78 ( = 0.001). Epley maneuver was superior to Brandt Daroff, "sham" and Semont maneuvers on nystagmus resolution and DHI improvement in patients with BPPV.
目的是比较Brandt-Daroff法、Semont法和Epley法在耳石复位中的有效性。在一家二级护理中心进行了一项单盲随机对照试验。纳入标准为:在Dix-Hallpike试验(DHM)中出现单侧旋转性眼球震颤的患者。排除标准:外周性或中枢性眩晕的其他病因。患者被随机分为4组:Brandt-Daroff组、“假手术”组、Semont组和Epley组。患者接受分组、首次就诊(1周时,若持续性眼球震颤则重复原始试验)和第二次就诊(2至4周),期间重复进行DHM和DHI试验。主要观察指标:首次和第二次就诊评估时DHM中无眼球震颤以及DHI评分。复位定义为无眼球震颤。我们纳入了34例患者(25例女性,9例男性)。患者被随机分为Brandt-Daroff组(n = 9)、“假手术”组(n = 7)、Semont组(n = 9)和Epley组(n = 9)。总体平均年龄为59.85岁(标准差±13.10)。共有47.06%的患者(n = 16)在首次就诊时DHM结果为阴性。Brandt-Daroff法的复位率为22.22%,“假手术”组为28.57%,Semont法为44.44%,Epley法为88.88%(P = 0.024);在第二次就诊随访时,Epley法的复位率达到100%(其他方法分别为42.86%、16.67%、44.44%,P = 0.006)。Brandt-Daroff法在第二次就诊时DHI改善了21.17分,“假手术”组改善了8.05分,Semont法改善了14.67分,Epley法改善了61.78分(P = 0.001)。在耳石复位和DHI改善方面Epley法优于Brandt-Daroff法、“假手术”法和Semont法。