Eggermont Dorus, Kunst Anton E, Hek Karin, Verheij Robert A
Department of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BJGP Open. 2022 Dec 20;6(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0091. Print 2022 Dec.
Appropriate referral from primary to secondary care is essential for maintaining a healthcare system that is accessible and cost-effective. Social concordance can affect the doctor-patient interaction and possibly also referral behaviour.
To investigate the association of gender concordance and age concordance on referral rates in primary care in The Netherlands.
DESIGN & SETTING: Electronic health records data ( = 24 841) were used from 65 GPs in The Netherlands, containing referral information, which was combined with demographics of GPs and patients to investigate factors associated with referral likelihood.
Health records covered 16 different symptoms and diagnoses, categorised as 'gender sensitive', 'age sensitive', 'both age and gender sensitive', or 'neutral' based on Delphi consensus. Multi-level logistic regressions were performed to calculate the associations of gender and age concordance with referral status.
Overall, 16.8% of patients were referred to a medical specialist. The female-male dyad (GP-patient) was associated with a higher referral likelihood (odds ratio [OR] 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02 to 1.27; = 0.02) compared with the female-female dyad. Gender discordance was associated with a higher referral likelihood regarding consultations involving 'gender-sensitive' symptoms and diagnoses (OR 1.21; CI = 1.02 to 1.44; = 0.03), and in duo and group practices (OR 1.08; 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.16; = 0.05). Age concordance was not a significant predictor of referrals in the main model nor in subgroup analyses.
Gender discordance was associated with a higher likelihood of referring. This study adds to the evidence that gender concordance affects decisions to refer, particularly with respect to symptoms and diagnoses that can be regarded as 'gender sensitive'.
从初级医疗向二级医疗的适当转诊对于维持一个可及且具成本效益的医疗体系至关重要。社会一致性会影响医患互动,也可能影响转诊行为。
调查荷兰初级医疗中性别一致性和年龄一致性与转诊率之间的关联。
使用了荷兰65名全科医生的电子健康记录数据(n = 24841),其中包含转诊信息,并与全科医生和患者的人口统计学数据相结合,以调查与转诊可能性相关的因素。
健康记录涵盖16种不同症状和诊断,根据德尔菲共识分为“性别敏感型”、“年龄敏感型”、“年龄和性别均敏感型”或“中性型”。进行多水平逻辑回归以计算性别和年龄一致性与转诊状态之间的关联。
总体而言,16.8%的患者被转诊至医学专科医生处。与女性 - 女性组合相比,女性 - 男性组合(全科医生 - 患者)的转诊可能性更高(优势比[OR]为1.14;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.02至1.27;P = 0.02)。在涉及“性别敏感型”症状和诊断的会诊中,性别不一致与更高的转诊可能性相关(OR为1.21;CI = 1.02至1.44;P = 0.03),在双人及团队执业中也是如此(OR为1.08;95% CI = 1.00至1.16;P = 0.05)。在主要模型及亚组分析中,年龄一致性均不是转诊的显著预测因素。
性别不一致与更高的转诊可能性相关。这项研究进一步证明了性别一致性会影响转诊决策,特别是对于可被视为“性别敏感型”的症状和诊断。