• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者调查研究了一家医院的选择退出烟草依赖治疗服务(CURE 项目)的护理体验。

Patient survey examining the experience of care of a hospital-based opt-out tobacco dependency treatment service (the CURE Project).

机构信息

Cheadle Medical Practice, Cheadle, UK

The CURE Project Team, Greater Manchester Cancer Alliance, Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2022 Oct;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001334.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001334
PMID:36216401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9557311/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Treating tobacco dependency in patients admitted to hospital is a key priority in the National Health Service long-term plan. This service evaluation assessed the perception, needs and experience of care within an opt-out hospital-based tobacco dependency treatment service (the Conversation, Understand, Replace, Experts and Evidence Base (CURE) team) in North-West England.

METHODS

A survey was offered to all eligible patients between 1 July 2020 and 30 September 2020. Eligibility criteria were adult patients identified as an active smoker being approached by the CURE team as part of the standard opt-out service model, on a non-covid ward without a high suspicion of COVID-19 infection and able to read and write in English.

RESULTS

106 completed surveys were evaluated. Participants demonstrated high levels of tobacco dependency with an average of 37 years smoking history and 66% describing the onset of cravings within 30 min of hospital admission. The average number quit attempts in the previous 12 months was 1.3 but only 9% had used the most effective National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended treatments. 100% felt the opt-out service model was appropriate and 96% stated the treatment and support they had received had prompted them to consider a further quit attempt. 82% of participants rated their experience of care as 9/10 or 10/10. Participants wanted a broad range of support post discharge with the most popular option being with their general practitioner. 66% and 65% of participants would have been interested in a vaping kit as stop smoking intervention and support vaping-friendly hospital grounds respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest this hospital-based, opt-out tobacco dependency treatment service delivers high-quality experience of care and meets the needs of the patients it serves. It also highlights the opportunity to enhance outcomes by providing access to NICE recommended most-effective interventions (varenicline, vaping and combination nicotine replacement therapy) and providing flexible, individualised discharge pathways.

摘要

简介

在国民保健制度长期计划中,治疗住院患者的烟草依赖是一项关键优先事项。本服务评估评估了英格兰西北部基于医院的烟草依赖治疗服务(对话、理解、替代、专家和证据基础(CURE)团队)中选择退出服务模式下的护理感知、需求和体验。

方法

2020 年 7 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日期间向所有符合条件的患者提供了一项调查。合格标准为被 CURE 团队作为标准选择退出服务模式的一部分识别为主动吸烟者的成年患者,在非新冠病房中,没有 COVID-19 感染的高度疑似感染,并且能够用英语阅读和书写。

结果

评估了 106 份完成的调查。参与者表现出较高的烟草依赖水平,平均吸烟史为 37 年,66%的人在入院后 30 分钟内出现烟瘾发作。在过去 12 个月内尝试戒烟的平均次数为 1.3 次,但只有 9%的人使用了最有效的国家健康与临床优化研究所(NICE)推荐的治疗方法。100%的人认为选择退出服务模式是合适的,96%的人表示他们接受的治疗和支持促使他们考虑进一步戒烟。82%的参与者将他们的护理体验评为 9/10 或 10/10。参与者希望在出院后获得广泛的支持,最受欢迎的选择是与他们的全科医生一起。66%和 65%的参与者分别对电子烟套件作为戒烟干预措施和支持电子烟友好型医院场地感兴趣。

结论

这些结果表明,这种基于医院的、选择退出的烟草依赖治疗服务提供了高质量的护理体验,满足了所服务患者的需求。它还强调了通过提供 NICE 推荐的最有效干预措施(伐伦克林、电子烟和尼古丁替代疗法联合治疗)以及提供灵活的、个性化的出院途径来提高结果的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2f/9557311/8f8674cec332/bmjresp-2022-001334f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2f/9557311/7912593d03fd/bmjresp-2022-001334f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2f/9557311/84a7b8c5075d/bmjresp-2022-001334f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2f/9557311/8f8674cec332/bmjresp-2022-001334f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2f/9557311/7912593d03fd/bmjresp-2022-001334f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2f/9557311/84a7b8c5075d/bmjresp-2022-001334f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2f/9557311/8f8674cec332/bmjresp-2022-001334f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient survey examining the experience of care of a hospital-based opt-out tobacco dependency treatment service (the CURE Project).患者调查研究了一家医院的选择退出烟草依赖治疗服务(CURE 项目)的护理体验。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2022 Oct;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001334.
2
Self-Reported Quit Aids and Assistance Used By Smokers At Their Most Recent Quit Attempt: Findings from the 2020 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.自我报告的戒烟辅助用品及吸烟者在最近一次戒烟尝试中的使用情况:2020 年国际烟草控制四项国家吸烟和电子烟调查的结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 29;23(10):1699-1707. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab068.
3
Interventions for quitting vaping.戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 8;1(1):CD016058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016058.pub2.
4
Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients.住院患者戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 21;5(5):CD001837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001837.pub4.
5
The Effects of Opt-out vs Opt-in Tobacco Treatment on Engagement, Cessation, and Costs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.选择退出与选择加入烟草治疗对参与度、戒烟和成本的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Apr 1;183(4):331-339. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7170.
6
Comparative effectiveness of post-discharge strategies for hospitalized smokers: Study protocol for the Helping HAND 4 randomized controlled trial.比较住院吸烟者出院后策略的有效性:帮助 HAND 4 随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Apr 16;21(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04257-7.
7
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.
8
Health economic analysis for the 'CURE Project' pilot: a hospital-based tobacco dependency treatment service in Greater Manchester.“CURE 项目”试点的健康经济分析:大曼彻斯特地区基于医院的烟草依赖治疗服务。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Dec;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001105.
9
Nicotine preloading for smoking cessation: the Preloading RCT.戒烟时的尼古丁预加载:预加载 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(41):1-84. doi: 10.3310/hta22410.
10
Varenicline versus nicotine replacement therapy for long-term smoking cessation: an observational study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.伐尼克兰与尼古丁替代疗法用于长期戒烟:一项使用临床实践研究数据库的观察性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Feb;24(9):1-46. doi: 10.3310/hta24090.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation, enrollment, and engagement in an opt-out telehealth pharmacist-assisted tobacco treatment program for patients seen in oncology outpatient clinics.在肿瘤门诊就诊的患者中实施、登记和参与一种选择退出的远程医疗药师辅助烟草治疗计划。
Cancer. 2024 Jul 15;130(14):2482-2492. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35291. Epub 2024 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Health economic analysis for the 'CURE Project' pilot: a hospital-based tobacco dependency treatment service in Greater Manchester.“CURE 项目”试点的健康经济分析:大曼彻斯特地区基于医院的烟草依赖治疗服务。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Dec;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001105.
2
Feasibility, uptake and impact of a hospital-wide tobacco addiction treatment pathway: Results from the CURE project pilot.一项全院范围的烟草成瘾治疗途径的可行性、参与情况和影响:CURE 项目试点的结果。
Clin Med (Lond). 2020 Mar;20(2):196-202. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0336.
3
Different doses, durations and modes of delivery of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.
用于戒烟的尼古丁替代疗法的不同剂量、疗程和给药方式。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 18;4(4):CD013308. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013308.
4
A Randomized Trial of E-Cigarettes versus Nicotine-Replacement Therapy.一项电子烟与尼古丁替代疗法的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):629-637. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808779. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
5
Effectiveness of a hospital-initiated smoking cessation programme: 2-year health and healthcare outcomes.一项由医院发起的戒烟计划的成效:两年的健康及医疗保健成果。
Tob Control. 2017 May;26(3):293-299. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052728. Epub 2016 May 25.
6
Neuropsychiatric safety and efficacy of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers with and without psychiatric disorders (EAGLES): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial.在有和没有精神疾病的吸烟者中,评估伐伦克林、安非他酮和尼古丁贴片的神经精神安全性和疗效(EAGLES):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2016 Jun 18;387(10037):2507-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30272-0. Epub 2016 Apr 22.