• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择退出与选择加入烟草治疗对参与度、戒烟和成本的影响:一项随机临床试验。

The Effects of Opt-out vs Opt-in Tobacco Treatment on Engagement, Cessation, and Costs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City.

Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, Kansas City, Missouri.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Apr 1;183(4):331-339. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7170.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7170
PMID:36848129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9972241/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Tobacco use causes 7 million deaths per year; most national guidelines require people who use tobacco to opt in to care by affirming they are willing to quit. Use of medications and counseling is low even in advanced economy countries.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of opt-out care vs opt-in care for people who use tobacco.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In Changing the Default (CTD), a Bayesian adaptive population-based randomization trial, eligible patients were randomized into study groups, treated according to group assignment, and debriefed and consented for participation at 1-month follow-up. A total of 1000 adult patients were treated at a tertiary care hospital in Kansas City. Patients were randomized from September 2016 to September 2020; final follow-up was in March 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

At bedside, counselors screened for eligibility, conducted baseline assessment, randomized patients to study group, and provided opt-out care or opt-in care. Counselors and medical staff provided opt-out patients with inpatient nicotine replacement therapy, prescriptions for postdischarge medications, a 2-week medication starter kit, treatment planning, and 4 outpatient counseling calls. Patients could opt out of any or all elements of care. Opt-in patients willing to quit were offered each element of treatment described previously. Opt-in patients who were unwilling to quit received motivational counseling.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes were biochemically verified abstinence and treatment uptake at 1 month after randomization.

RESULTS

Of a total of 1000 eligible adult patients who were randomized, most consented and enrolled (270 [78%] of opt-in patients; 469 [73%] of opt-out patients). Adaptive randomization assigned 345 (64%) to the opt-out group and 645 (36%) to the opt-in group. The mean (SD) age at enrollment was 51.70 (14.56) for opt-out patients and 51.21 (14.80) for opt-out patients. Of 270 opt-in patients, 123 (45.56%) were female, and of 469 opt-out patients, 226 (48.19%) were female. Verified quit rates for the opt-out group vs the opt-in group were 22% vs 16% at month 1 and 19% vs 18% at 6 months. The Bayesian posterior probability that opt-out care was better than opt-in care was 0.97 at 1 month and 0.59 at 6 months. Treatment use for the opt-out group vs the opt-in group was 60% vs 34% for postdischarge cessation medication (bayesian posterior probability of 1.0), and 89% vs 37% for completing at least 1 postdischarge counseling call (bayesian posterior probability of 1.0). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $678.60, representing the cost of each additional quit in the opt-out group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, opt-out care doubled treatment engagement and increased quit attempts, while enhancing patients' sense of agency and alliance with practitioners. Stronger and longer treatment could increase cessation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02721082.

摘要

重要性

烟草使用每年导致 700 万人死亡;大多数国家的指导方针都要求使用烟草的人通过确认他们愿意戒烟来选择接受治疗。即使在发达经济体,药物治疗和咨询的使用率也很低。

目的

评估默认情况下不选择参与治疗(即“被动”)与选择参与治疗(即“主动”)对使用烟草的人的治疗效果。

设计、设置和参与者:在“改变默认值(CTD)”中,这是一项贝叶斯适应性基于人群的随机试验,符合条件的患者被随机分为研究组,根据组分配接受治疗,并在 1 个月的随访中进行告知和同意参与。在堪萨斯城的一家三级护理医院共治疗了 1000 名成年患者。患者于 2016 年 9 月至 2020 年 9 月随机分组;最终随访于 2021 年 3 月进行。

干预措施

在床边,顾问进行了资格筛选、进行了基线评估、将患者随机分配到研究组,并提供了被动或主动治疗。顾问和医务人员为被动治疗患者提供了住院尼古丁替代疗法、出院后药物处方、两周的药物起始包、治疗计划和 4 次门诊咨询电话。患者可以选择不接受任何或所有治疗。主动治疗患者如果愿意戒烟,将提供之前描述的每一种治疗方法。不愿戒烟的主动治疗患者将接受动机咨询。

主要结果和措施

主要结局是在随机分组后 1 个月时通过生物化学方法验证的戒烟和治疗参与率。

结果

在总共 1000 名符合条件的成年患者中,大多数患者同意并参加了研究(270 名主动治疗患者[78%];469 名被动治疗患者[73%])。自适应随机分配将 345 名患者(64%)分配到被动治疗组,645 名患者(36%)分配到主动治疗组。被动治疗组患者的平均(SD)年龄为 51.70(14.56),主动治疗组患者的平均(SD)年龄为 51.21(14.80)。在 270 名主动治疗患者中,123 名(45.56%)为女性,在 469 名被动治疗患者中,226 名(48.19%)为女性。在第 1 个月和第 6 个月,被动治疗组的验证戒烟率分别为 22%和 19%,主动治疗组的验证戒烟率分别为 16%和 18%。1 个月时,被动治疗优于主动治疗的贝叶斯后验概率为 0.97,6 个月时为 0.59。在第 1 个月,被动治疗组的药物治疗使用率为 60%,主动治疗组为 34%(贝叶斯后验概率为 1.0),第 1 个月,被动治疗组完成至少 1 次出院后咨询电话的比例为 89%,主动治疗组为 37%(贝叶斯后验概率为 1.0)。增量成本效益比为 678.60 美元,代表了在被动治疗组中每增加一个戒烟者的成本。

结论和相关性

在这项随机临床试验中,被动治疗将治疗参与率提高了一倍,并增加了戒烟尝试,同时增强了患者的自主权和与医生的合作意识。更强和更长的治疗可能会增加戒烟率。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02721082。

相似文献

1
The Effects of Opt-out vs Opt-in Tobacco Treatment on Engagement, Cessation, and Costs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.选择退出与选择加入烟草治疗对参与度、戒烟和成本的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Apr 1;183(4):331-339. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7170.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Postdischarge Smoking Cessation Interventions for Hospital Patients: The Helping HAND 4 Randomized Clinical Trial.比较出院后戒烟干预措施对住院患者的效果:HELPING HAND 4 随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Aug 1;182(8):814-824. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2300.
3
Changing the default for tobacco-cessation treatment in an inpatient setting: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.改变住院环境中戒烟治疗的默认设置:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Aug 14;18(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2119-9.
4
Sustained care intervention and postdischarge smoking cessation among hospitalized adults: a randomized clinical trial.住院成人的持续护理干预与出院后戒烟:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Aug 20;312(7):719-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.9237.
5
Effect of Sustained Smoking Cessation Counseling and Provision of Medication vs Shorter-term Counseling and Medication Advice on Smoking Abstinence in Patients Recently Diagnosed With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.持续戒烟咨询和药物治疗与短期咨询和药物建议对近期诊断为癌症的患者戒烟效果的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Oct 13;324(14):1406-1418. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14581.
6
Sustained Care Smoking Cessation Intervention for Individuals Hospitalized for Psychiatric Disorders: The Helping HAND 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.针对因精神障碍住院的个体的持续护理戒烟干预:HELPING HAND 3 随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 1;78(8):839-847. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0707.
7
Tobacco Quitline Retreatment Interventions Among Adults With Socioeconomic Disadvantage: A Factorial Randomized Clinical Trial.社会经济地位处于劣势的成年人使用戒烟热线再治疗干预措施:一项析因随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2443044. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43044.
8
Effect of Combination Treatment With Varenicline and Nicotine Patch on Smoking Cessation Among Smokers Who Drink Heavily: A Randomized Clinical Trial.伐尼克兰联合尼古丁贴片对重度饮酒吸烟者戒烟效果的随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e220951. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0951.
9
What to do after smoking relapse? A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial of chronic care smoking treatments.吸烟复发后该怎么做?慢性护理吸烟治疗的序贯多项分配随机试验。
Addiction. 2024 May;119(5):898-914. doi: 10.1111/add.16428. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
10
A Post-Discharge Smoking-Cessation Intervention for Hospital Patients: Helping Hand 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.一项针对住院患者的出院后戒烟干预措施:“援手2”随机临床试验
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):597-608. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.04.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Design of a randomized tobacco cessation trial among FDNY World Trade Center responders in a lung cancer screening program.在肺癌筛查项目中针对纽约市消防局世贸中心救援人员开展随机戒烟试验的设计。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Aug 5;20(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00598-3.
2
Stakeholder perspectives on facilitators and barriers to implementing a zero-dollar copay program for chronic conditions study.利益相关者对实施慢性病零自付计划的促进因素和障碍的看法研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 6;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01278-5.
3
Desire to Quit Smoking, Opt-Out Tobacco Treatment, and Cessation: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.戒烟意愿、非主动选择的烟草治疗与戒烟:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433802. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33802.
4
Implementation of an "opt-out" tobacco treatment program in six hospitals in South Carolina.在南卡罗来纳州的六家医院实施“选择退出”烟草治疗计划。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):741. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11205-7.
5
Implementation of statistical features of a Bayesian two-armed responsive adaptive randomization trial with post hoc analysis of time trend drift.具有事后时间趋势漂移分析的贝叶斯双臂响应式自适应随机试验统计特征的实施
J Biopharm Stat. 2024 Jun 7:1-15. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2024.2359149.
6
Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients.住院患者戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 21;5(5):CD001837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001837.pub4.
7
Uptake and 4-week quit rates from an opt-out co-located smoking cessation service delivered alongside community-based low-dose computed tomography screening within the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial.在约克郡肺癌筛查试验中,在社区低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查的同时提供了一个选择退出的联合戒烟服务,该服务的吸收率和 4 周戒烟率。
Eur Respir J. 2024 Apr 18;63(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01768-2023. Print 2024 Apr.
8
Implementation, enrollment, and engagement in an opt-out telehealth pharmacist-assisted tobacco treatment program for patients seen in oncology outpatient clinics.在肿瘤门诊就诊的患者中实施、登记和参与一种选择退出的远程医疗药师辅助烟草治疗计划。
Cancer. 2024 Jul 15;130(14):2482-2492. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35291. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
9
Predictors of Patient Engagement in Telehealth-Delivered Tobacco Cessation Treatment during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间,远程医疗戒烟治疗中患者参与度的预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 25;21(2):131. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020131.
10
Are behavioral economics interventions effective in increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake: A systematic review of evidence and meta-analysis?行为经济学干预措施在提高结直肠癌筛查参与度方面是否有效:系统评价和荟萃分析证据?
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 5;19(2):e0290424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290424. eCollection 2024.